All Activity

I have followed all those tips for sure. Which is why I am at a loss for figuring out what is going on.

Look at the picture and please tell me what to do. Thank you. Which item is the Blower. Got mixed up and puzzeld

Okay. Jesus this will be the third time. I will try this. Although I think the problem is my CPU isn’t boosting. It’s getting to hot and throttling. It had a dramatic effect on temps with the 14900K. Like 8-10C drop. So I was hoping it would help with AMD. Will reapply thermal paste and see if that helps.

Rename your 'DCS' folder in 'Saved Games' to something other than "DCS" and see if you can reproduce the crash. You can launch DCS once and it will regenerate a new 'DCS' folder in 'Saved Games'. Exit DCS, copy and paste your old bindings into the new folder and try to fly as you wanted. Will need a quick reset of your graphics settings, but at least its faster than re binding everything for your Hotas. If it is fixed, it is something inside that 'DCS' folder such as mods or scripts. Realized your pagefile was enough through DxDiag. Make sure you've set a good amount of 20+gb on a fast drive. I don't know if DxDiag calculations are exact on pagefile sizes.

just tried 2nd flight and froze up again after take off took screenshot ......no crash log filed for dcs.. DxDiag.txt

Jeesh. The devs request that you post a TRK file, when you come here and cite a bug. Doing so shows them exactly what the poster is referring to and provides them with all the accompanying parameters. If you care enough to come and post about a bug, just honor their request.

Hello, what should I choose between the Quest 3 128 GB or the Quest 3 512 GB? And what is the difference, please?

Not a bug, but rather incomplete unit. Even among ED SAMs there are many examples of missing sensors. Examples include KUB, Neva, OSA, Tor, Hawk... Along sensors goes often wrong behavior. And if we are talking human controled units you quickly arrive at conclusion that further extensions of human machine interface is needed. I hope that wit CH inclusion Combined Arms will get more love from ED in future.

Дорогие друзья! На сервере БК4 выходит новая масштабная миссия — «ФУЛЬДСКИЙ КОРИДОР»! Карта "ГЕРМАНИЯ" Июль 1989 года. Холодная война достигает своего апогея. Варшавский договор во главе с СССР разворачивает решительное наступление через стратегический Фульдский коридор — самый уязвимый участок обороны НАТО в Центральной Европе. Советские танковые колонны, прорвав оборону в районе города Фульда, развивают охват с севера и юга, стремясь нанести решающий удар. НАТО спешно стягивает войска и авиацию, чтобы остановить прорыв и удержать линию фронта. Формат миссии — PvPvE с уникальной системой очков. Начальные силы сторон: Красные — 50 очков, Синие — 50 очков. Выполнение задач: Каждая успешно выполненная задача даёт вашей стороне очки и одновременно отнимает их у противника. Чем сложнее цель — тем выше награда (от +1 до +3 очков). Потери авиации и техники: каждая потеря уменьшает очки вашей стороны и усиливает противника. Победа: одержит та команда, которая сумеет лишить врага всех очков или удержит перевес к концу времени миссии. Красная сторона (СССР и страны Варшавского договора): Прорвать оборону НАТО. Уничтожить штабы, базы снабжения, РЛС и артиллерию противника. Подавить авиацию НАТО и обеспечить продвижение своих войск на запад. Синяя сторона (НАТО): Остановить наступление противника. Разгромить колонны бронетехники и уничтожить штабы Варшавского договора. Лишить советские войска снабжения, сорвать их координацию и нанести максимальные потери авиации. Эта миссия — не просто бой, а настоящая борьба за инициативу, где каждое действие влияет на исход сражения. Собирайтесь в звенья, координируйтесь с союзниками и готовьтесь к напряжённым боям! ФУЛЬДСКИЙ КОРИДОР ждёт своих героев!

This topic has already been discussed here: This is how it works: but In the last interview, Wags also mentions about it too: Generally, it is not planned at the moment, it would require quite significant changes to the behavior of the weapon in the form of JSOW, but everything is possible in the future.

Do you have the same issue as me with the EC1/30 not appearing on the F1B list? I tested in DCS with France as country, but also in the EDM, where all liveries should appears. Of course it's not a great issue as it works with the F1BE.

I've had that before as well. Make sure you're putting the Anemo-switch on, as soon as you're started up, so it can start removing the ice. Seems like DCS wants to ice up your probes on startup really quick or it doesn't account for your probes being guarded. I have taken off with unreliable airspeed (same message) and the probe heater burned through the ice during climb. We were flying with a Mirage 2000 in the formation and he crashed on take-off, most probably because his probe was iced up as well and hence his FBW got all confused...

there has indeed been a Transall mod so far, by @damienntrix as far as I can tell but it is the french NG version. The french R and german D versions are missing and the liveries present on the NG version available with Damien's mod pack are of relatively poor quality. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/263509-pack-8-helicos-ia-armee-francaise-diverses-structures-17-vehicules

Great! Now I want a transport tank with a shark-skin

Thanks for the tip. I'm using Open Mods Manager so I copied CoreMods/aircraft/FA-18C/DTC/ALR67/CMDS_defs.lua to my mods library (using the same relative path) and edited the file there to my liking and enabled that mod. Now after a cold start, if I go to MUMI and load the ALR67 I get that modified default configuration. No need to load a custom DTC for DCS UI after slotting in. Works just fine for me even if it's not entirely satisfying. I noticed that in CoreMods/aircraft/FA-18C/DTC/defaults there are multiple test.json files which might also be relevant but I have no idea how to use/tune them and anyway they're still in the main install path and not in Saved Games so it's not really more useful than tuning CMDS_defs.lua. It'd definitely be nice to be able to have a default configuration in saved games for users to tune.

I'm happy a fix for loading times is in the works, but at the same time, I don't think HT On vs Off should be disregarded, if not as a direct cause to the issue, at least as something that might point to it. It's clear many users find that disabling HT helps with load times, both in these forums and the discord server. In my case, I made 12 runs, 6 with HT on and another 6 with HT off. The results are as follows: Desktop to launcher average of 37s with HT on vs. 13s with HT off. Launcher to menu average of 85s with HT on vs. 41s with HT off. I don't think it makes much sense to assume as normal behavior that disabling HT cuts loading times by more than half compared to HT enabled. I really think this should be looked at by the developers as it may point to a possible issue with Intel CPUs. I'm running DCS on a 14900k, btw. dcs-hton.log.zip dcs-htoff.log.zip

Correct, missing many countries here: ToDo: To add Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Neederlands, Neutral, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Yugoslavia Partisan Ships, Aircrafts, SAMs, AAA, Weapons, Electronic and others equipment from WW2. Wait to add Nato/other countries stuff

The PG-16V is already implemented and can be seen being fired by "Paratrooper RPG-16". The Mk 46 appears to be from the South Atlantic assets (the exact same model is present in that directory too, with its inaccuracies - like the nose that's the wrong shape and the rear-most propeller that's a lot smaller than it should be).

Mission 10 , does not progress after stores Jettison ? Great Campaign BTW also the Simplify Deck F-10 menu does not appear

Hi. I know that the saved game features are still in development, but it would be good to see triggered assets having their waypoints and actions saved. For example, I've tested the features and if an aircraft isn't triggered it will appear on the saved game but without its actions (CAP, AWACS, etc) and without its waypoints. It means currently one has to manage these assets before loading the saved game. It's okay for simple missions but a lot of work for more complex scenarios. Anyhow, it's a great feature but could be fantastic

I'm very happy to read this ! Leaving the button mapping to user was a design choice. It's not that long to do and let everyone do it the way they want, feel used to or natural. For the ch47 CDU, i agree ! i counted the lines LSK and RSK , match , i asked the dcsbios team if i could help on making it available but looks like it's not that easy. I'm monitoring it regularly and as soon it's available i'll add it to the project. Again, glad to read that my project helped you. And the physical CDU in the A10C is a real game changer / fun to have.

What about all the other slots (5/9/11/14 for cat1)?

You don't specify motherboard model. This is where to start. Detail is needed on the computer: Self built? Or prebuilt? Is it new, by chance? (In January this year, you indicated having a Z790/14900k system, with a 4090... so it appears you have changed since then). Download and run CPU-Z, to determine current BIOS version here: https://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html This is a very reputable, safe app. There are other ways to check BIOS version, but CPU-Z will offer additional information that will be helpful as well. Post a screen shot of the first three tabs (see example below). Likely the machine needs a BIOS update; this behavior could easily be due to out-of-date BIOS which doesn't properly support the CPU. Are you running AMD's Ryzen Master by any chance? CPU-Z tabs: (PS Also need info on what the 3060 GPU is doing there...are you trying to use it as a Physx device? Or maybe for the Lossless Scaling app? I'd try running it without, just as a test).

Ну как то не особо получилось. Если честно. Особенно на Ми-8. В мустанге еще +/- срабатывает , т.к. стекло близко к голове , то на Ми-8 летаешь словно без стекол. Хотя сколько видел картинок из жизни - грязи там хватает. И на относительно ранних версиях было в целом норм.

front windscreen itself is tinted to green