All Activity

When there are multiple carriers, they all have the same name (Essex class carrier) on the comms menu, ordered by distance to the player. So, contacting the intended carrier in the group for reporting inbound is a bit problematic. This may be relevant to the problem you're describing.

Yeah, it looks like that's a (weird) error code inside of DCS. Was misleading, that's why I looked at Onedrive first.

В этом на 1:50 показывают.

hello. post your latest dcs.log. also, check windows event logs. make sure all you OC is off for testing.

DCS isn't even remotely a good software for handling complex graphics. In fact, even if you have the best graphics card and the best processor, it will always present these kinds of problems because, I suspect, everything hasn't been synchronized properly in its programming. Furthermore, when you connect to multiplayer, all the frame rates are thrown off. This last point shouldn't be the case. DCS shouldn't influence a user, no matter how bad their connection is, and slow down my FPS. Having said all that, your problem could come from where your data disk is located; Windows access, other interfering programs, or external software accessing the same disk could be the cause. Here's what I can think of offhand based on what you're saying. Best regards.

Probably none of them, but engine management wise it's obviously something relatively close to P-47 and F4U. I don't think any of the others would be anything even vaguely similar to compare to.

ED post a teaser on your discord some weeks ago:

Is there any way to stop the constant spinning view in encyclopedia? I know it stops when you click on the view but it starts again when you view the next model. I would like to stop it by default.

the upcoming version 1.2 has a proper radio and so can communicate with the carrier in the same way as the f-18. Here is a recording I did while testing v1.2:

No. If you've read the thread title, it should be obvious that the thread is about the issue of taxiing with diff breaking. Relevance of wind to taxiing and how it inaccurately aggravates the issue, as discussed at length above, is clear. Feel free to disagree, but unauthorized thread policing is not appreciated. Edit: For further clarity, crosswind is raised as a contributing factor to the problem, not as the sole cause of the issue. Just in case it is not crystal clear.

Actually just checked the mission and in AG2 the laser code is set to 1686 on the APKWS 151's so they wont hit the targets as well. Change it to 1688.

I am working on updating a few under the hood changes, progress is slow due to job requiring me to leave for remote locations where internet is often non-existent, as well as closing on a new home. I'm still also trying to fully traceback and eliminate some multi-threading desync/permissions issues w/ some of the scanning functions. Current Hill's assets are in game content, integrated into the game. Prior they were a mod, that's still in game content via module that uses DCS Modulization infrastructure. My Launcher is an external application, and doesn't fully integrate with any DCS functions at all, so two entirely different scenarios, however, one could use my launcher regardless of DCS version and bypass the built in ED Launcher if they choose.

You can still do a case 1 recovery but to my knowledge there is no way of doing comms with the LSO. At least not in the current version. So just do it in silence. Also, a note to the devs: the T-45 has a yaw damper with a turn coordination function which means the aircraft in real life shouldn't require any pedal input for coordinated turns. The one in DCS requires a boot full to keep it coordinated. Whilst I appreciate the extra challenge in making the aircraft more "hands on" I hope the devs correct this to reflect real-world behaviour

Hello everyone, The 2.0 update for the UH-60L Black Hawk mod is now available on Patreon to all: https://www.patreon.com/posts/uh60l-mod-2-0-138859868 Please read the instructions in the post carefully! I will be updating the Discord server to include a bug tracking section for any issues encountered. Please note the ED forums are not a helpful place to report issues regarding the mod; issues tend to get lost in the noise. I hope you all enjoy the update.

Do you run SRS at all? I tend to find running SRS alongside dcs will cause this exact same crash, When not running srs it loads straight in without hanging on post net start. Hope this helps or a clue no i dont have logs as i have dcs uninstalled.

this happened twice in a row in this mission. hot start on ground, short flight in freezing temperature, engine degrade and subsequent damage beyond repair and prop seizure. engine_degraded.trk

Both have the wrong frequencies listed in the briefings, the FAC is listed as 131.5 in the briefing but is actually on 133.5. The second mission with the UAV is listed as 225 in the briefing but is actually on 255. Hope this helps

Ну так что... панночка помэрла?... или все же нет? На Facebook OctopusG последняя запись, имеющая отношение к "лавке" от 8 мая!!!... здесь инфы тоже ноль... Ждать/не ждать (нужное подчеркнуть) модуль?

Hi, hatte ich auch angeschaut, war noch das Beste was gestern im Fernsehen kam (bis endlich AEW Dynamite kam). Bin auf kommenden Samstag gespannt.

В модуле AH-64D это Панцирь-С1, например. От типа пилотируемого нами пипелаца зависит.

Generally, you should fly the MiG-29 with the metric system for obvious reasons. Even the planes used by the GDR were Soviet-style. This means that if someone changes metric to imperial and the cockpit to English, it's a form of fake (for example, even Iranian MiG-29s had Cyrillic characters in their cockpits). It's like having to fly an F-16 in the metric system because I know it better. I propose 3 rules: 1/ keep it real 2/ learn and develop 3/ be ambitious

Такой вопрос-что за угроза облучения на RWR под номером 22

Thanks for posting your settings. If this really solve the problem, then that's good. I have tried today to get rid of the veil/square - whatever we can call it - today. I noticed one thing, sharpening seemed to make it worse. So, I turned off sharpening in DCS settings, and that helped quite a bit. Now I almost have to look for it. I still have sharpening i Tallymouse quadview tool - without it the picture quality takes a hit. Not in the cockpit as much but outside when looking at the landscape. I see you also have Anisotrophic filtering at x4. I have at 16. Maybe that's makes a difference? Anyway, here are my settings that makes the problem less visible. Also, certain lighting conditions makes the square more or less visible.