All Activity

На днях зашел в онлайн и удивился, что у меня 16-30 фпс. Поставил новые дрова и снова стало 75 фпс. Но, когда я летом поставил новые дрова, при определенном освещении и погоде у меня дергалась кабина. Причем, только на карте Германии.

I have a feeling this has to do with the target altitude in DTC. I couldn’t understand the way Wags explained it exactly what this was changing, and it seemed to be for every waypoint

I just wish he would say what his sources are

I'm using FFBeast

Works for me. I‘m still flabbergasted though that the issue comes and goes.

Then it’s probably unfinished. But eventually you won’t be able to use gun with the tank

Were you at low altitude? MPRF suffers below 3k meters In addition coop is perfect for MPRF because IRST will likely have lock when it drops. Probably why when fully implemented coop mode will lock radar to MPRF

Ok, i think that's a NLU model, which allows you to say stuff out of order with the system still understanding your intent from a limited set of possible commands. These are lightweight and would also be part of my proposal. I just did not mention them specifically to make the post easier to digest. The benefits of optionally integrating an LLM would be that the AI could actually react dynamically to situations in the sim. The API would not only pass along player communications (in text, after STT), but also selected sim parameters. For example, a flight instructor LLM could assist new players, while a RIO could comment on your flying skills or provide input on the tactical situation. The API could expose different sets of parameters depending on the role the LLM is meant to "play." A RIO would receive aircraft states and the tactical picture (within the realistic limits of what it could actually know). The model could also be trained on DCS manuals and NATOPS. I think the advantages are obvious, but i admit that currently it might push most computers too far. However, in just a few years the situation will be very different. There are already extremely lightweight LLMs that, if trained on the right data and fed with real-time game states, could easily take on the role of an instructor or a cocky RIO.

I'm not sure... it probably shouldn't be like that, because as I understand it, the tank blocks the opening of the shell ejection cover...

As far as I know, Qusahwira was still under construction during the time period the PG map is representing. Same can be said for the air base in Zayeed Military City.

-45 degrees and +70. There are some sources saying -37 and +56, but I believe this is only for search mode I appreciate you giving a track! 1. What do you mean HUDs work differently? 2. Because it’s incorrect and unfinished Nineline, Gman has given a track. References are combat employment manual which explains the degree size of the HUD scale and purpose of the rhombus/diamond, and this other 9.12/9.13 manual that explains the rhombus/diamond must be kept inside the square of the HUD to maintain lock, something it cannot do right now

Вот с этого момента поподробнее, это что за "внутренние" документы (и кто их утвердил такой смелый) которые отменяют РЛЭ, НПП или ныне ФАП по 275 приказу МО РФ? Юморист...

non ho parole è ricomparso magicamente sto secondo asse del grilletto del joypad.... maledetto windows

Passengers skinpack 2 for A330 https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3347122/ Former B757 skinpack's current condor scheme are in Red / Blue / Orange. Today's A330 are in Yellow / Green and only tailfin Blue.

Indian capabilities in keeping their aircraft operational are quite well known. I'd assume that it was way worse in early to mid 2000s

А вы знаете, что такое "приёмка", не как вам кажется, а как это трактуется требованиями ГОСТ РВ 15.307-2002? А вы в курсе, что ВВСТ кроме ОТК и ВП принимает комиссия из в/ч, и чем больше недостатков будет устранено на предприятии, тем проще потом будет эту технику эксплуатировать...Так что открывайте подобные "тайны", кому нибудь другому...

They just use the Microsoft Speech Recognition included in Windows, like VoiceAttack/(VAICOM), but they use AI to "restructure" the speech-to-text, in case you say something in the incorrect order. Right now that's all we need in DCS in my opinion. And @SharpeXB is correct of course, they only need to use it for ATC. But that shouldn't stop us from giving commands to wingmen/JTAC in DCS. Hell, we can even do it now. But it's limited to exact commands limited by how VoiceAttack functions. Maybe VoiceAttack will include some sort of AI down the line. Then we're golden. Sort of. None of this will work until ED has fixed the overall AI in the game. And we can already do that by now with VAICOM, except you need to say the correct commands perfectly. That's where we need the AI like they've done in BeyondATC. I have no need to strike up conversations, but have the AI "understand" me in stressful situations. Maybe I'm missing your point, but what more do you really need? Cheers!

Do you have AV running?

Just wondering that let DCS idles for 5-10 mins after signing in since DCS starts loading plugins (regardless singed or/and unsigned mods) in background (task manager can tell how busy the system is, especially CPU), and see it helps or not.

Wow thanks. I must have missed something. Who said that Enigma worked for or spoke on behalf of ED??? Can you please point me to that post. Btw, do you work for or speak on behalf of ED??? Just curious.

Если нечего сказать то отвечать не надо. Раз непонятно, объясняю. ЕД и многие люди считают что СПО глушится собственной РЛС. Это противоречит книге по СУО, инструкции по обслуживанию СПО, схемам самой РЛС итд. В случае если исправная\правильно используемая совокупность систем борта работает нормально мы сможем доказать что СПО может работать с включенной РЛС. Мы знаем что СПО получает сигнал на запирание, никогда не получает сигнал на открытие, то есть запираться она должна только пока идет запирающий сигнал, плюс возможно своя какая-то внутренняя латентность. Сигнал используемый в ТЭЧ для проверки цепи бланкирования имеет частоту 500 килогерц. Частота повторения импульсов Н019 в ВЧП, предположительно, 160 килогерц то есть СПО должна с ним справиться если её проверяют на 500. На схеме РЛС линия бланкирования идет как "разовая команда", но аналоговая. Внимание вопрос. От того как выглядит сигнал бланкирования у исправной системы в реале, зависит что будет с СПО-15 при включении собственной РЛС. Будет показывать собственную РЛС всегда\иногда, будет заглушена все время, будет работать как в ГС3 иногда пропуская глюки - куча вариантов. По блок схемам мы знаем что РЛС подает на СПО сигнал. Надо выяснить как он выглядит. Это "1" пока включена РЛС, или сигнал на каждый импульс работы РЛС, или сигнал зависящий от импульса РЛС но проходящий цепь логики которая может сбиться с синхрона в определенных условиях?

Please ED include a more precise description of the trigger behaviours in the manual. I would like to replicate the true behaviour with my VKB MCG Pro. Thank you!

Yeah, same here ... The plane is amazing, and as I'm learning it step by step, I'm loving it ever more. Bugs happens, it's not a big deal, they'll get fixed. The most weird thing for me was how docile it is ... I was able to land it on the first try ... And I'm not so good. The radar is weird, it won't lock anything , the aircraft is an aerodynamic marvel with a crap electronic system and a HUD that is like an embrional idea of a hud. and that's amazing! Well, yeah, I'm still fighting to lock anything that tries to avoid me, but I really like it.