All Activity

Those clipped-wing Spits (and the A6M3 Model 32) were clipped CONSIDERABLY more than the Corsair's.

As already noted by others, the "T" stands for TAS or true airspeed or, in simple terms, your speed relative to the air mass you're flying through. In the Flanker, it's the same speed that's always present on the HDD's lower right corner regardless of whether you are in a NAV, A2A, or A2G mode.

Швейцарский магазин находится в Швейцарии, а не в РФ. Он подчиняется швейцарскому законодательству.

An actual realign isnt possible that easily and would require a lengthy procedure. It is possible to do a nav-fix though, similar to how you would do it in-flight when overflying a nav-fix waypoint. Jester support for that on the ground is in the works. That will only get rid of your current accumulated drift though, not realign anything. So you would accumulate new drift quickly again. The Jester Wheel already features an option to "upgrade" your alignment in case you for example didnt do a full alignment beforehand. Further options are in development.

It was too low for Corsairs because the armoured deck, which was 4 inches thick, produced a lot of top weight, so it had to be as low as possible to maintain stability. This created a hangar much reduced in height from a US carrier. Luckily the wing tips could be removed. History might have been very different otherwise. ..

This comes up from time to time in the wishlist: https://forum.dcs.world/forum/207-dcs-core-wish-list/

During a quick turn/re-arming between sorties, is there a fast method to realign the INS while you're sitting there? Is there a way to tell Jester to do it, or do you have to shut down and restart to get an alignment? The drift can be significant after even one long flight. I don't know the WSO cockpit procedures. Thanks

я подумал вы тролль, и начали гасить меня умными вопросами к счастью там не был, всю информацию черпаю из воспоминаний наших героев которые участвовали

It's a game (with different shortcomings) either way. That's a pointless discussion. SP has its values, MP does too. (E.g. droping warheads on foreheads is not the only part of military aviation, I would dare to say it is the smallest. So if your interest is aviation - flying a particular aircraft in the first place - SP pretty much does the trick. (Personally I would love to see a proper ATC for that reason, but that's beside the point) I don't want to, but just food for thought: There several different ways to do muliplayer. Public servers (PvP OR PvE), private servers or even closed groups from 2 people upwards. How it goes depends pretty much on the people and what you're trying to achieve

Получается если какой-нибудь условно швейцарский магазин решит поиграть в политику или будет нарушать законодательство страны в которой находится ему осложнят жизнь. Вот и всё. А насчёт Google, они вместе с российским государством захотели поиграть в политику. Обе стороны получили убыток. А я как житель России получил неудобства пользования тем же YouTube. А уж наказание это или поощрение не знаю.

The development of the radar has been going on for a very long time. I am tired of waiting and have lost hope of seeing it

Our F-16 3D model and textures are really showing their age compared to the latest modules. Some still feel we have a rushed and unfinished product on the artwork and 3D side of things. I hope that the reluctance to include community liverys is a sign that work is being done in house to improve things.

That would be the best case scenario which I hope is true.

Ich habe mir bei Trustmaster die MDF Cougar gekauft, knapp 100 Euro ! Sie funktionieren super und waren schon für das Modul (ausser AH-64D) vorprogrammiert ! Sie machen die Simulation noch realistischer. Habe sie für den AH-64D selbst programmiert und mir Anzeigen in der Mitte gemacht, damit weiß ist, welche Knöpfe der MfD AH-64D (siehe Bild) entsprechen. Wenn es nur um das belegen von Knöpfen der MFD geht, ist das eine sehr gute Lösung

What flanker0ne said, if not enough turn off ground shadows. The GPU has to render two (pilot view+VID) or three (pilot view+VID+IHADDS) different scenes at every frame, PNVS and TADS are also delayed, so it's a huge ammount of data to be processed. Don't know if it's possible to run video feeds at 1/2 or 1/3 FPS, it could be the best solution without lowering image quality.

If it’s not already possible in the config files an easier solution would just be the ability to change the cursor size and color. Personally I have no trouble seeing this using TrackIR. My guess is that this issue is particular to VR given the small sweet spot of some HMDs but not head trackers in general. Also, welcome to DCS

I tried Multiplayer for over a year, with a famous spanish virtual flight group, and you will never convince me that multiplayer is better than single player: I trust my own experience more than other people's sayings.

Thanks. I think Cobra already contacted them and provided internal details :)

You got it all wrong! DCS is irrefutable proof that Spheric Earthers are complete conspiracy nuts!

Or these things take time to make and it's not like Wags is a full time video producer...

" Rethink what DCS is. I dare you! " O.K. - DCS the Train Simulator ! Yes DCS Trains have a few bugs and if they can get fixed it will be great. Its good fun using the ready made DCS Maps as Very Nice Full Size Railway Layouts for the 3d Model Trains i make in Blender. I sometimes use the M.E. Scenery Removal Zone and place my own Buildings Sheds and Stations. You would think the Very Complicated Shay Locomotive with sideways cylinders would make DCS Crash but no problems were encountered. check out the interesting videos - bones animation and running in DCS Its now looking great doing realistic smoky work hauling sugar trains on Narrow Gauge Marianas WW2 Map ! Its Rewarding flying a Spitfire around looking for my Trains. Shay in DCS.flv SHAY LOCOMOTIVE bones ANIMATION 2 (3).flv

Yep, that's it. Mirrors and cockpit displays (like TV or Tads e.g) fall into the same category in that they need an additional render viewport (and therefore reduce fps)

Sorry to destroy your world, but singleplayer is even more a game than multiplayer. Without other humans, DCS comes down to scripted stuff and incapable AI. Or to solo training sessions with stationary targets. If you actually wanted to fly in a sim, you'd need a squadron and real opponents. Like on some of the really good campaign servers. Of course, GS server or the like are not so realistic, but the air combat is still a much better experience than against AI.

Any news on this? Really would like to see this in DCS.

This is unrelated and already reported: