All Activity

Glad you enjoyed the trial. Please disable hotplug and retry, it is usually the reason, some pc's do not handle it well. I will move this to the controls issues section, as it isnt a aircraft bug. thank you

The best I ever found is using DLAA with the K preset enabled in Nvidia Profile Inspector. Nothing else works worth a hoot for me. To minimize ghosting, turn off Sharpening. I use a 2560 x 1440 single screen. AD

Nice Idea. That could have the potiential to attract my interest in the F35.

https://www.ozon.ru/product/linzy-dlya-pico-4-zashchishchayushchie-ot-sinego-sveta-1616008827/ Я вот такое заказал, вписав данные из рецепта и прикрепив его сам, на всякий

Hi, das wäre auch mein Ansatz gewesen. Am besten du markierst deine eigene Antwort noch als Lösung.

@Eagle Dynamics So what is going on?

Since we are loosing the Harrier , we should get a Vtol aircraft to replace it . So please make the B version

For longer TWS shots you don't need Jester interaction at all. Just choose Phoenix, AA mode, Master Arm On and fly intercept high and fast. Jester will turn on TWS Auto mode. When in range, depending on the closure speed, fire the missile, crank to keep the lock (until Phoenix active) and reduce the closure, lose alt to stay below target. Of course bandits will defend and some of your shots will miss but 100% miss seems like something you do wrong or the targets were hit by your friendly flights already. Below 20nm, as already said, either ask Jester to lock the "target" ("enemy" is only for IFF confirmed bandits) or use PAL mode.

+1 support the extra fuel modification on the wings

What do you mean? With datalink there are three options. A circle that guides to intercept, a circle that guides straight to them, and a rear intercept. However the circle is on the HUD in a 45 degree scale (just like circle in navigation mode, the path wanted is 45 degrees off when circle at edge of hud), so even when your intercept is straight to them, circle won’t cover target unless perfectly centered

The problem with the change logs is that a lot of the fixed notes can be ambiguous, as it does not state proper context You could read the above as it is: - It is now hidden, where it was shown incorrectly before - Or it was been hidden incorrectly and is fixed to be visible.

I had that in my MiG-29 yesterday: I kept asking 100 (the A-50) for bogey dope, and they insisted the closest bandit is the one I locked up, off my nose at 25km. The next thing I see is flames and me tumbling out of control as I hear a voice say: "717, MERGED". Well, that was helpful...

Not sure if this is a bug or intended behaviour. If you select airfield two or three then hit the RETURN button the selected airfield flips to number one. After that you can select two or three and it'll 'stick'.

Lösung gefunden. Die G502x Maus hatte eine zu höhe Melde/Abtastrate im Profil gespeichert. Bissl runtergedreht und es geht wieder ohne Ruckeln. Vielleicht hilft es anderen .....

IMO people who aren’t in the military wearing military style patches is cringeworthy. Unless you’re a kid… Or these guys

I like the idea of a virtual squadron carrying out semi-realistic PvE missions, however, the main obstacle for me is the inability to commit to a particular mission push time, or to stay connected for several hours at a time. Perhaps this is something to save for retirement, or at least until the children have moved on. At the moment SP suits my needs, and the EDDCE will (hopefully) provide much of what I am looking for without relying on MP servers. I also don't like the fact that some groups require additional software/apps like Discord or SRS, rather than just using the integrated comms. I have zero interest in PvP 'Air-Quake' with unrealistic respawns, instant rearming, air starts, etc.

Yes that's fine for Flaming Cliffs, but many people expect more from a full-fidelity module. If Heatblur can call their modules "F-14A-135-GR" and "F-4E-45-MC", then ED can call it "MiG-29 9.12A". It will also make the distinction between FC3 and FF easier for the more casual people

Remember: First: DCS World has no "Balance". Many of that projects has 3rd Party projects, no ED. 3rd party select projects by your criteria (normaly by countries). The Mig-29A by ED, has build with info the a old Warsac Pact country, no Russia. As Wags claim on previous Q&A, the problem has the available info, SME, resources, time and licenses to make a FF Redforce aircraft, remember the problems by Deka to make a chinesse FF aircrafts. About ED projects: Su-25A FF has no claimed by ED yet, as a Su-27 FF, A-10A FF and other Mig-29 FC versions. Await ED share news about them. Actual future ED projects F-15C (Blue) F-35A (Blue) Future Helo (Blue and/or Red) A6M5 Zero (Red) About 3rd Party projects: Aerges Mirage F-1M (Blue) F-104G/TF-104G (Blue) Airplane Simulation Company C-130J (Blue) Aviron KFIR (Blue/Red). Crosstail Studios A-1H (Blue) Deka Ironwork J-8B PP (Red) FlyingIrons Simulations: A-7E (Blue) HeatBlur Simulations: Eurofighter Trench 1 (Blue) A-6E (Blue) F-14A (Early) (Blue/Red) F-14B(U) (Blue) IndiaFoxtEcho: G.91R Gina (Blue) Magnitude 3 LLC: F-8J (Blue) MilTech 5 / PD: Bo-105 (Blue) Octopus-G La-7 (Red) Po-2 (Red) Su-17 (Red) Polychop Future Helo (Blue) Red Star Studios: Mig-17F (Red) The Rafale has only a rumor, none 3rd party has claimed them yet.

Works for me. From 0-30 degrees off nose IRST locks. From 31-45 only R-27. You can tell because you get no dashed circle only dashed crosshair. But 46-60 degrees nothing will work on HMS unless ( right now), R-73 only works 45 degrees off boresight but helmet can do up to 60

I support the rename. I wish ED was a bit more careful with internal naming scheme. For some aircrafts they use official designation but for some inofficial. And in some cases they actually duplicate designation for 2 variants (example Ka-50). BTW it is interesting to note that X-25, X-29 was envisioned in this version already. I wonder why they dropped that. Off course X-29 came to 29 later, but it is worth noting that it was part of upgrade options for 9.12 operators.

thanks you, we have asked the team to check this and have made a rpeort.

Not at all, but what is likely to get more attention: 5 threads with 5 posts each, or 1 thread with 25 posts? Granted, this quote is about wishlists, but still.

I always took MiG-29A as a colloquial form of NATO lingo Fulcrum-A following how NATO pilots talk about it and would have absolutely no sleepless nights if it stayed that way, but that is just me.

You don't have to like Apple to use an iPhone. You don't have to like ED to enjoy DCS the way you want to, be it as a digital museum or something else.

null