VirusAM

Hi, thanks for your videos. Can you tell us please the reported resolution for steamvr at 100% In the past I tried the reverb and i had bad performances, now i have the index and it reports an higher res (100% is the double of the real index resolution) then the reverb but performances are much better. Could you tell us also the difference with the reverb set at half resolution? Which is the reported res, how worse it looks and if performances gains this way are real... Thanks

I would like to do the same questiom

dovrebbe essere il tasto backspace (quello per cancellare, normalmente sopra l'invio...scusa ma in italiano non mi viene)

No there is VR zoom, and SpyGlass zoom...but it is a toggle button (not analog like in 2d simming).

Is your usb connection 3.1?Which usb cable are you using? Clarity in VR depends much from Supersampling. So you should try the VR settings in DCS (as a baseline) and then use Oculus debug tool or Oculus tray tool (as an older Rift S user I advice you to use this tool) to test with different levels of Pixel Density. Being the Quest 2 a standalone HMD, there is another variable which is the link cable. Here is important to have a good quality cable (the original one, or anker one adviced on the official site) and a fast usb connection because of the bandwitdth.

For sale FSSB R3 Warthog base ------- SOLD TM F16 Add on stick (almost new) ---------- SOLD 2x Winwing adapters for Thrustmaster grips CH Pro pedals Everything is in good working condition Prices: Fssb + F16 stick = 400 euros including shipping (in EU) SOLD Winwing adapters = 20 euros (each) + shipping Ch Pro pedals = 90 euros + shipping For any questions or request just ask

Sorry...but what is COOP? Ps i tried the google reasearch but i can only find a supermarket

Well if you don’t use motion smoothing every second spent under 90fps will be stutter for you. I advice you to put motion smoothing to always on or auto.

That is exactly what I am worried about. Unfortunately amazon don’t offer a service to upgrade the bios...but probably many little specialized shops will

Well he is talking about lss so the jtac should lase for him. Can you upload a track please

The campaign is really fun and as a book fun I am slowly but steadily enjoying it. By far the most realistic and complete campaign for the Hornet. Now I need a little but of help as also if i read the document posted by BD and know quite well the usual brevities (those that are used in my virtual squadron at least) I feel that i am losing something with many unusual words and procedures for me. Of course I already checked on google :) So these are the mistery words for me - Ladder (as I understood from the contest is should be a joker/bingo equivalent. Isn’t it?) - Armstrong - No alibies - Difference between strike/knight - general explanation of the acronyms in the briefing Thanks in advance for the help.

Well, the mission went well I managed to accomplish it, but after engaging the iranian ship and being cleared rtb i choosed to aar. But when i was near the viking he choosed to act as a boom tanker and replied to me in that way (chick and tow 1 mile trail etc etc). After multiple abort and ready precontact I decided to give up. So I asked the wingman (olive) to do the aar, and she just turned away and went for landing. I had to land as well and managed to do that with less then 500lbs of fuel remaining!!! Was so scary at night ???? Very nice mission, I hope BD can understand and sort these problems

Third time, I was able to succeed in the mission, However, something strange still happened. While I was in the Case I circuit (hearing all the transmission between strike and raven2), a message appeared for me to press "space" when I had the "outlaw" on the radar scope. The problem is that I got no previous message of an outlaw (which IIRC should be an unknown contact according to what I remember of the brevities). I pressed space, and then another message popped up, asking me to press space again when I would have locked the outlaw (which I didn't see...only unknown contact was a C-17 over Dubai). After that nothing more. I landed on the carrier and this time the campaign went to mission 8. So.... What was supposed to happen? PS: I noticed also that the Iranian f14 had US aggressor skins and that 2 mig-21 had croatian skins.

I tried this mission twice and I had multiple issues. First time, I did everything that was asked to me, including contact marshall and go back after the (mirage 2000) interception . I landed on the carrier, and strike contacted raven2 for another interception. Nothing more was asked to me, so I exited the mission but my score was 0, and after hitting end mission, the campaign was still on mission 7. Second time, Olive landed immediately after take off.... No problem for me as I know triggers and AI can be strange but I wanted to point these issues out in order for BD to explore possible solutions. Thanks

For now it will work only on ships. It is wip

Cosa aggiungere

Where did you see that?

Ehehe...anyway the CEII is not from ED. Anyway this is the first time they hype so much with a secret module (that i remember). They announced the Viper at the end of 2018 but there were a lot of rumours around it in the previous years...also an announce on ED facebook page, deleted after some hour.,,,

I think that the only thing that would be mind melting for the vast majority of DCS user base would be a very modern western aircraft (f22/f35/rafale) or a fairly modern russian aircraft. Lately they are teasing su-34 a lot (but I don't think they will be able to do a so modern russian module)...but also mig-29k (exported to India), could be a good candidate. Some rumors were spread about a Mig-29a....it would be a nice addiction for sure...but not so mind melting in my opinion. Also they excluded that it is something they already teased/announced (so no Hind, no Phantom, no Apache and then no Mig-29a). We also all know the difficulties to get permission to do russian modules...So I am thinking more to a western jet. There is also another explanation...that they just exaggerated in creating hype (remember Mil3 hype for the CEII...we all were going to think it would havbe been a mig-25 and where really upset discovering it was just a biplane - nothing wrong with it, but why all this hype then?). About your question...the Hornet was first teased/announced in 2012/2013...work on it started some years later after collecting all the docs and probably license agreement with Mcair.... So basically it depends from how long it is already in development (I hope the secret module is already at a certain stage of development)...probably early access not before 2 years from now.

It is an unofficial mod

+1 ATO and metar codes should be explained somewhere. Also some communication during the mission are not explained in the guide in this post. I suspect those are navy brevities to which I am not familiar. An example that I remember now (but there are many others) “ladder” but I understand it should be the navy equivalent to the air force bingo or joker

Io ad Al Minhad

Credo di si.... Cmq bravo...hai chiamato per nome (stormo) l’entità.... Non vorrei sembrare il precisino della situazione, ma squadrone non è una entità esistente in italiano....squadriglia/stormo/brigata aerea sono le entità esistenti in ordine di grandezza dell’unità organizzativa.

Do Skate work for you?or did you pay him something? I mean he is doing nice stuff in his free time and for free (like the updater utility for example) we should just thank him a patiently wait for other mods to be released...

It is just the warthog base rebranded. So equivalent to hall sensors