Snoopy

Sure hope it gets implemented, it's the one major thing we're missing from HMCS.

Uhm that antenna is already there and it’s a Multi use antenna. Satcom, uhf, and vhf

If I'm remembering correctly one of the reasons we didn't carry them on my deployment in 15/16 was we didn't have the longer rocket pods (LAU-131A/A or LAU-68F/A). I don't recall ever seeing them loaded on the legacy pods personally. Reading through the dash 34 it states AGR-20 laser guided rockets are loaded in the LAU-131A/A or LAU68F/A. No mention of them being loaded in the legacy rocket pods. Would be nice to get the LAU-131A/A and LAU-68F/A added. https://www.arnolddefense.com/product/lau-131-a-2/ https://ndiastorage.blob.core.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2012/armaments/Tuesday14006paras.pdf It's only about a 12 pounds different between the 131A (66.66 LBS) and the 131A/A (78.5 LBS) but according to the A-10C-1-1 drag index is the same for the short and long pods (0.80).

Guess we'll find out tomorrow...hopefully we can get a 510th and 421st pilot on the DS to check.

DSMS profile yes but APKWS does not have an impact on the rocket reticle, it's the same as using regular, non laser, rockets in the real jet.

Y’all want more flares (which would be useless honestly) and I just want the double ones we used my last deployment.

Don't worry, Stuka and I have already discussed some things for our 3-3 on this topic ;)

Not odd that’s correct behavior. The jet doesn’t care if they’re traditional rockets or laser guided.

Yes we still don’t have link 16, it’s projected but last I heard not funded yet.

Pilots place maps other docs under it or attach bags to them.

Yes

Nope with two ARC-210s you transmit by... Mic switch FWD - Transmit ARC-210-1 Mic switch Down - Transmit ARC-164 Mic switch AFT - Transmit ARC-210-2

Wouldn’t change the tail number

The A-10C isn’t a new airframe it was just an upgrade to A models, so extensive the AF decided to re-designate as “C” models.

Shouldn’t we can’t carry it real world

No, that’s not something the A-10 has real world.

Like I’ve already said the current A-10C and what we are getting in version 2 aren’t pure suites so to call them suite anything wouldn’t be accurate. Agree

Neither version is a pure or correct suite so it wouldn’t be right to call either one a specific suite number.

You’ll be missing out, if they model half of what HMCS can do it’ll be a game changer.

I sure hope so, and IR illumination rockets!

Okay I’ll leave you to your unrealistic request then.

Actually it is, no mention in any Tech Orders = not possible. Thread honestly should be closed as it has nothing to do with the A-10C realistically.

It’s a big and already reported IIRC

Realistically through a gateway yes, what ED will implement who knows.

What I think they’re asking is an AWACS sharing data and it showing up in the TAD. Red for bad, yellow for suspect, white for unknown and blue for neutral.