stormrider

Thank you, one more question before I commit to digging the old rattlebucket: Is it possible to accomplish that workaround within the player's own group or is it limited to AI only groups?

When Habu approves the fixes, I promise I'll buy the A-10C II. Not before.

options.graphics.stereo_mode_use_shared_parser = true It does seem to better performance a little, but for some reason, when the TGP feed is on in the MFD, the performance starts crawling.

Looking at the comments in the game' system files, most of those programmers apparently already quit ED long time ago and had not documented their code properly. :music_whistling:

Is there a script code for grouping and ungrouping units?

Well, if that's what they call our developers are working hard on it I think we can all assume that DCS developers are actually HR managers and managers are bank clerks. :megalol:

Yeah, still all I hear are clouds, but not really weather and its physics.

One thing that I dislike about the MSL OVRD in DCS is that without the DTC functionality, the MFD pages are not populated so, other than the auto/assisted acquisition functions which are missing for the Aim-120, you also looses HSD from the R-MFD.

Would you mind please share? That'd be very interesting to know, if anyone, please share how.

Perhaps its off-the-charts.

When you select Dogfight Mode Override, Aim-9 missile is automatically selected, but along with that should the Cold feature be automatically activated.

No price hike there. But a huge devaluation for 2080 ti owners.

I am very very sorry for all those who bought their 2080 ti recently. Priced correctly (~$399) I'm voluntarily willing to easy your pain, send me email. (Ps. Shipping to the UK included)

It only showed clouds, which were also shown back in 2017. They didn't show any weather tho.

They seem to do this from time to time. Then eventually after a few years everybody forgets about it.

Either of these: [No Bug], [Correct as is], [Later in Early Access] :joystick:

VR

+1

Not exactly. This open-beta argument is bs. There is a difference between expecting everything to work and expecting what little is there to work. If what is there is modeled wrong, you're doing negative training, therefore wasting time and getting frustrated. That is more counterproductive than non-constructive feedback. If on the other hand, feature wise, limited, but it's few features work as expected or advertised then the open beta argument would be valid. Right now, each feature is released piecemeal and fixes or further implementations are spaced by months apart leaving the module in a constant half-broken state. That's not open-beta.

Among other things.

Or your own tail.

You mean 100 years?

:megalol:

Why 2007 ffs?! Why lock it to a single year? Just give it everything and we mission designers decide what's best for the mission. :doh:

:doh: