Jump to content

Looney

Members
  • Posts

    1261
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Looney

  1. Visit our website http://132virtualwing.org/ and see if we can be your home in the future!
  2. Was the TCS slaved to the radar? Did you have a valid radar lock?
  3. I wonder if they'll add another sensor layer to the sim or (re)-use a sort of radar missile guidance for torpedoes, but really slow :)..
  4. Well cheers, here's to no more sliding Tomcats, Bugs and helicopters!
  5. You've stated it yourself, ...that F14 TID in AC stab mode has some weird behavior... It's Aircraft stabilised and therefore expected to turn with the aircraft. If you want a top-down view of the tactical area, switch to ground stabilized.
  6. It's not the JF-17, it's an ED thing. All western aircraft are exempt from receiving anything from the A50. I'm not sure if the russian birds actually have an AWACS datalink.
  7. On my keyboard, it's \ on the ground and RALT \ or RALT ' in the air.
  8. The connector is either shorting the contacts, most likely on the PCB itself. Or there is some grounding issue going on where your finger acts as a capacitor, lifting the voltage of the pins to such a value the controller sees it as a valid input.
  9. I applaud your effort Ranma13, thank you for your time and dedication to this piece of kit. If you need anything, give me a PM. I can't properly code but I may be of use for other things.
  10. Meeh, it's not two week yet!
  11. ^^ this would be most helpful!
  12. Thank you for implementing the Navgrid, the 108th has some work to do now so we'll leave you to it :D
  13. Any news on this? I'd love to see bidirectional communication between Streamdeck and DCS.
  14. He man, wish you could see, PacMan on the DDD is awesome!
  15. Looney

    Black Shark 3?

    Two weeks ofcourse!
  16. Jamming is EDs thing and right now, it's only noise jamming that's implemented.
  17. Mi8 has this as well, must be an ED thing.
  18. Copying the mod to the saved games folder doesn't solve the IC check?
  19. Now all we need is a RIO HCU
  20. Thanks a lot for looking into it, highly appreciated!
  21. Thank you for taking the time to answer my question. The main reason for me to want the NAVGRID implemented is to allow the F-14 better SA during MP events. The people I fly with (not just the 132nd but a lot of other organisations) are set-up in such a way that a bullseye reference is used for all A2A calls. We're routinely conducting flights with up to and over 30 participants, ranging from F18s and F14s providing cover for A10s and KA50s while human JTACs, human AWACS Weapon Directors and human ATC and human REDFOR provide immersion and great fights. The work-around we use now, is to ask the human controller to give BRAA calls to the F14s and even that is somewhat more difficult in the F14 because the Bearing indication on the TID is referenced to own aircraft as opposed to North, meaning some small math is involved to identify the correct group in the BRAA call. With the NAVGRID implemented, A2A with a controller and CAS becomes far more efficient to perform. I'm happy as long as it hasn't been scrapped from the list, we'll hopefully see it eventually.
  22. Can I throw money at you guys already?
  23. Check there is no modifier active. Also, on the LGB training mission, the radio information for the JTAC is not given. I had to go and look for it in the mission file to be able to extract the freq I needed to set was 144.000. Can this be included in the briefing or kneeboard?
  24. They're sleeping out their hangover, give it some time!
×
×
  • Create New...