MacEwan

+1 here Loving the campaign so far, about half way through. Looking forward to more if you decide to expand this campaign or make another one!!

If I understand the radar correctly, targets will dim slightly as the radar signal return decays. For example, if a subsequent sweep from the radar does not detect the target the brightness will decay until the target is no longer visible or the next radar sweep detects it again.

What about a neighbouring country or region that remained neutral or when fighting an insurgency etc... There are plenty hypothetical scenarios where a neutral party could be in the same vicinity where there is conflict. In any case, what's the harm in having it as an option for mission makers to use?

This has been my experience also

I was flying today and could see nav lights way further than I could before, and this was in daylight conditions. They still need some work on how they appear (kinda blurry right now) but definitely a big step in the right direction. Haven't tested at night yet.

Depends on the type of war

Can you explain what you mean by this a little further please? I've run into this problem as well and would love to have a workaround.

This is true. It takes A LOT of getting used to.

I used TrackIR for many years but the switch to VR made a whole world of difference. I think one of my favorite things about it is the feeling of depth perception you get in VR

Seems legit to me. I've had the same experience as well. But I couldn't comment on whether or not that's realistic.

Also, just to check, are you sure it was your radar that detected it or a Datalink contact from another source?

I usually go back and forth. I stay on open beta as long as the performance is good enough. If there's an update that knocks down my performance bad enough that its unplayable I revert to stable until the next open beta update. Rinse and repeat everytime there is an update.

If you're looking to add life to DCS check out this mod: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=194247 You modify things heavily if you like or you can use the pre-built templates that come with it.

Same here, since the May 20 Open Beta update. It flashes immediately after launch.

Geeze all this drama about something so simple. Quite frankly, it should have just released with the option to disable it and noone would have said anything about it.

Just a guess, but he might be talking about this section of the forum: https://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=440

I've also been frustrated with this problem from the start, any fix would be greatly appreciated as it's pretty much useless with the map on as it is. Also flying in VR here. *On a side note, do the Gain and Contrast knobs even do anything right now? I dont see any difference when using those.

Agree 100%

And on the flipside, if you unload in the viper, you'll regain speed much faster than in the hornet. *Experts please correct me if I'm wrong.

Immortality is working on my F18 (and all aircraft) just fine.

This really does sounds like a great way to do it. I hope it can actually be done and done soon if possible. It really is uncomfortable the way it is currently implemented.

Yes, given the context I'm pretty sure she was talking about Stable update.

I think the long term goal is to have crews in land based airfields as well. Starting with the carrier makes sense because it's a smaller "airfield".

Honestly, with or without Vulkan, I think an overhaul of the underlying code will improve things drastically. You add Vulkan to that and I would expect to see a more than decent improvement.

Technically, what Captain Orso is saying is correct, it's not a "bug" since the mouse is behaving as it should. What we are asking for here is a "Feature Enhancement" so that the mouse does not move with the HMD. And for confirmation, I would also love to have the VR headset separated from mouse as well. I would prefer that where I look does not affect mouse movement.