StandingCow

Like this:

Wait for actual benchmarks where we can see settings, etc. The ones Nvidia posted could be very cherry picked. I would suspect the 2080ti to be about 30% faster than the 1080ti, but, again.. wait for actual benchmarks.

I can't tell you how many times I heard on GAW server, "I am on the bandit's 6... oh nevermind he ran into the ground". I guess the AI can't be killed if they kill themselves first. :D

You can absolutely tell the difference between 60 and 120. This website has lots of information: https://www.blurbusters.com/faq/motion-blur-reduction/

Think it would be due to this, the launcher rails are wrong: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=218271

They said it was an issue on ED's end... guess that changed? https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3597913&postcount=12

Yep, I remember having an issue with Warcraft III back in the day where parts of the orc's armor were missing... never had an issue in any other game. Turns out one of my sticks of ram had like a bad sector or something. Computers are just weird sometimes.

Huh, so the beta release with the AGM-65E crashing if used pushed to release? I mean what is the point of beta? That's a pretty big bug to push to stable version.

This is the reason I like more conservative programs (MAN 5 is my fav)... so I don't go through all my countermeasures right away. Only downside is... well you die if it turns out it wasn't enough.

Keep in mind ray tracing is new, and there is a chance the gpu needs updated drivers, etc. But, I agree... if turning on ray tracing means sub 60 fps most people will just have it off until more powerful cards come out that can handle it.

Usually when you see titles like that (and Nvidia saying the 2080 will be 10x as power as 1080ti) they are talking in VERY specific circumstances. Basically... I will just repeat what others have said, wait for benchmarks to come out.

Wait for benchmarks (always good advice). The presentation really gave us little information on how these will actually perform.

Saw this post in reddit and thought I would post it here since it is relevant:

Well.. this explains a lot, gonna take a bit to change habits.

If everything is wrong with the plane.. nothing is wrong. :D

I would bet that MP sliding is just the delay/difference between what your pc sees and what the server sees. Maybe it will improve as the netcode improves?

Hey, it's not my job to sell it to you or make you happy. I gave you my opinion, take it or leave it. I can see from the quality of your response that you aren't worth talking to. Good day.

"Schilling" is not the same as disagreeing. Although it is a really nice strawman you made there. :) When I buy an EA module, I accept a "slow pace" of development, I know what I signed up for. If I didn't want to deal with unfinished modules, I would avoid EA items all together. I suggest you avoid early access modules in the future if you are unhappy with the pace of things.

Agreed! I know in real life people can't "zoom" their vision but I think we need to balance gameplay a bit with real life... when zooming in the scratches are really a pain.

I think it's pretty clearly stated when a module is in early access, as it has been said before... if you don't want early access modules, don't buy them. You can wait until it is fully complete before purchasing. Some of us prefer early access, it allows us to learn systems as they are introduced. If it weren't for EA we still wouldn't have our hands on the hornet or the harrier.

Are you kidding? There are patches quite often to the harrier. Have some patience.

I would think if we got a hotfix for anything it would be the LMAV crash...

Check this one out, I love it: AW3418DW

Yea, the changelog seems like it isn't updated well at all, tons of stuff in that isn't mentioned. You expect some odds and ends missed but jeeze...

Each team having 1 or 2 AWACS would be a pretty cool addition. Would make a juicy target.