Jump to content

draconus

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    13547

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

 Content Type 

Everything posted by draconus

  1. draconus
    Here are your support options, incl. e-mail: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/support/ You can stay logged in if you set DCS to remember your credentials but it may still ask you for the password when there are problems with authentication server or your authoristation data file is lost. You can also use offline mode if you play single player only and don't intend to update DCS at the time: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/support/faq/authorization/#3300385 You don't just delete account because you have some trouble - you'd lost all your licenses.
  2. draconus
    I was just correcting the wrongly mentioned 1.5 requirement for the Hawk. I get your point but currently it's the only module that is left out of DCS.
  3. draconus
    No, because they were not Iranian, neither in the movie nor IRL
  4. draconus
    They might do so with FM (as was the case with A-10) but certainly not sensors. Weapons are the same.
  5. draconus
    Wow! Full VR pit Love the unicorns
  6. draconus
    Hawk works on DCS 2.5.3.
  7. draconus
    https://github.com/neatchee/nvidiaProfileInspectorForkAIO/releases It's a fork of original NPI.
  8. draconus
    I could not make it work. Flying behind A-50 with SW lock on/off, SEAM on/off, tons of flares but no flare catching lock or tone on one.
  9. draconus
    No, it works fine and is very needed function. Eyes also adapt IRL. You mean the color bands or what?
  10. draconus

    Su-27M

    draconus replied to T4buk's topic in DCS Core Wish List

    Advanced and more realistic simulation of the systems.
  11. draconus
    It never ends well - after pages of flame wars ED says "no plans":
  12. draconus
    Yet in DCS the F-15, F-18 and MiG-29 has RCS of 5m2, F-16 (all versions) - 4m2 and Viggen is 3, same as F-5, MiG-21 or JF-17.
  13. draconus
    Minus the penalty - so it's not clear who is paying who and we'll probably never know. Not happening any time soon.
  14. draconus
    @Chizh Is this possible currently?
  15. draconus
    Either they fixed it or it's a problem on your side, like the browser automatically changing the language for you.
  16. draconus
    It's also for AI to see and attack targets when tasked to do so.
  17. draconus
    What's stopping you? Here's all you want to know:
  18. draconus
    Forgot to mention - the voice over for Yak aircraft says [Jack] instead of [Yuck] but I know it's minor and you probably wouldn't want to rerecord the file again
  19. draconus
    Are you sure you can't STT from RWS?
  20. draconus
    No, you have to post a wish and move on.
  21. draconus
    There's a guy with RPG - idk if it's enough for a tank.
  22. draconus
    Doesn't it work with JTAC?
  23. draconus
    Make sure you allow it in DCS options and bind a key for it.
  24. draconus
    OT,
  25. draconus
    Trainers are not as popular as fighters, duh?! Now go to MP aerobatic server or virtual air shows and tell them all "the effect is not good" No, it was not a mistake. It was opportunity to simulate Yak-52 (they have already made it for professional client) and they went for it. Those who found it interesting or liked the aircraft have bought the module and had fun with it. Your failure does not imply that DCS failed with anything. You're just trolling at this point. We do have a few trainers and there even was another one (PC-9/A) WIP but unfortunately they stopped the development.
×
×
  • Create New...