draconus

What puts me off MP? schedule and time dedication reliance on 3rd party apps like Discord or SRS poor or no briefing/mission plan (public servers) unrealistic mission settings and randomness of powers on both sides (public servers) DCS MP performance and visual weirdness (jumping/warping aircraft) no RL friends playing risk of meeting griefers, trolls and cheaters (public servers) What I miss in SP? unpredictability and skills of human opponents much better interaction with wingman and other friendly flights more realistic comms between flights and services (ATC or JTAC)

It's not flyable module - it's AI only. Make sure you either have correct date for the aircraft operational years or remove historic filter (watch icon at the bottom of ME). Also make sure you selected US as the country.

It wasn't. 2.9.0 beta added it in October 2023.

It's a new 3D model. The wing flex is planned to come later in the development [from Wags comment].

What good is air traffic without even 737 or A320 models?

Does not matter if it's baked texture or dynamic light. Both look different for night and day so it is possible to toggle it. Currently it's only based on night/day hours - it could also be based on new wished-for triggers.

I agree but it's not that simple to just throw some model there. Every soldier is expected to have his own hit box/DM (if you kill the crew the unit is not dead but is not active either and it changes the gameplay) and IR layer. Its placement may collide with rotation or elevation of the unit/gun unless smartly connected. Anyway I support.

Thanks for that and I agree

Yes, would be nice and is of course requested for years, every week but the reasons are still the same: redfor sells worse that US made aircraft docs and SME's are more hard to find and use as a source legally even looking for it may endanger ED - especially its russian/belarus employees If it's in newsletter then it's official but mind it won't be full fidelity. Moreover ED claims that they'll look how MiG-29A Fulcrum sales go and if it's good they'll reconsider doing more/modern redfor aircraft.

You missed the point. I never said he works/speak for ED, so don't look for it. I said he doesn't. I don't work or speak for ED either so I refrain from spreading misinformation that ED would have to clarify later.

You can use any other 2FA app ex. Microsoft Authenticator.

It'd all be cool but we don't even have currently proper VR support for CA.

ED have just answered and clarified. Enigma does not work for or speak on behalf ED. DC is a future feature without specifications or ETA. You should not make any purchase decisions based on it.

It looks like the whole map download is the same as any part separately. Only the license(s) decide which part you have unlocked for high res.

The thread is about what we want to see in DC not what you're afraid of not getting. ED said they're not trying to copy BMS, they have their own vision, and that's good. Just wait and see, no matter how much time it takes. Don't let random DCS influencers influence your judgement.

Nice, thanks for the mini campaign Georgia 2008 Just please fix the mission names, it's a mess.

It's universal like a Huey. Although it started development and some production during end of the Cold War, most of its life it's NATO helicopter and spread worldwide, not a WarPac. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PZL_W-3_Sokół#Operators

Since it's a single J letter he should read it as Джей correctly. G (джи) is simply another letter. I said it's minor so don't accuse me of nitpicking and everyone reads HUD as a word, not H.U.D, so Idk what's your point.

F-14 has both RWR and radar on very high level. F-15E has both AA and AG radar on very high level. Idk how realistic its RWR is. Bluefor weapons are constantly improved but most of them are already at high modeling level, esp. 3D models, fuzes, guidance and FMs. They work on the better blast damage and fragmentation. Incendiary is also in plans.

No, TAA is like worse version of DLAA and no machine learning is involved. Yes. I choose DLAA - dots visibility is not that much of a problem for me but I can't stand the shimmering of MSAA, or the fences and other jaggies. Don't even try none-AA - serious eyes injury risk - and you'll also want that performance with AA then. The ASW crap is the worst, not related to AA though.

They recently corrected bombs' power, damage points of buildings and also some units.

Already added, thx https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/filter/unit-is-mig-29a_fulcrum/apply/

In one of my docs I can see: 1. for bombs -100 and -250 or -500 (up to 4pcs) - G limits +5/-1.5 2. for 2 KMGUs - G limits +5/-1 3. for 6 -500 bombs - G limits +4/-1.5

That depends on your throttle and brakes operation and it looks like it's not unrealistic, just operator mistake.

Yes, yes, yes. You can have R-27 on inner pylons and R-73 on outer pylons and you'll be able choose between them.