Wags

Although termed BRA, this display does not include the altitude element.

Way too late. Order RTB in the port hold.

It certainly works. If you can post a track, I'm sure many of the helpful folks here can assist you.

It is correct as is.

Thanks guys. The issue has been reported and we'll try to fix ASAP.

Dooley is no correct. There is no bug.

It's a fixed threat circle that does not account for altitude, aspect or airspeed. Same as threat circle in ME. It is NOT detailed accounting of engagement range, but rather a very rough estimate. Same as the real system.

Because the D/L had to add new elements to the .miz file, you may need to re-save your Hornet missions that include C2 aircraft. If that still does not work, please delete and replace C2 units. Thanks for the excellent OB reporting so far. This highlights the great value of the OBs. - Wags

Already reported thanks.

Folks, as noted, this is already reported thanks.

No, they should not.

Thanks, reported.

All can say is that the HARM does not, nor should not, provide range data in TOO.

Yes, please provided a track in the bugs and problems sub-forum. No, they should NOT be in sync.

As stated, re-saved.

Not seeing this after D/L has time to update. Enter a bug report with a short track file the demonstrates it here: https://forums.eagle.ru/forumdisplay.php?f=594

Correct, and NCTR must be boxed from the radar format page. The NCTR is not magic and requires certain aspect and range parameters to be met.

Working okay here in the Open Beta. Please re-save your misions, some missions may require re-saving. I've also included the attached. Also, please watch the instruction video: Thanks SA-SAM-Test-Caucasus.miz

After LTWS

Two new weapons coming to the Hornet later in early access are the GBU-24 Paveway III and GBU-32 JDAM. Here are some images of the new models. For the keen-eyed, you may notice varients in thermal protection and fuzes. - Wags

Line of sight, not ground location. While this is enough to project a TD box, there is no inforamation of ground elevation at that LOS/ground intersection point, so there is no value to complete the trig value for range. When the TGP is later available after HARM, then that point could be designated and the LRF could be used to determine range. Only PB modes provides range without assistance from a non-HARM sensor. The Hornet portion of the OB is already committed, the TD box will come in a later OB.

Such a capability does not exisit in the legacy Hornet.

The advantages of TOO over SP: 1- When TD box is available, a better indication of emmitter line of sight through HUD 2- Better filtering 3- Can display more emmitters Just a different tool in the HARM box. If SP works better for you, go for it.

Manual IFF designate, not radar lock designate. The video is an early, incomplete version of the LTWS. We plan LTWS for later in March. The SSS depress function will be in the next OB update.

After a lot of time with the Tomcat, I'm sure everyone will be very happy. It's a wonderful product and sets new DCS standards in several areas. We are proud to publish it. As the publisher though, we do take the responsibility seriously of publishing a tested product. We rightfully got blasted in the past for publishing too soon. We can only begin the full evaluation after we receieve the release candiate. While we had access to development builds along the way, it's the release candiate that is the foucs. We are already very busy going through the evaluation process and we VERY much hope to make it for sale as early as we can. It will be worth the wait. - Wags