RustBelt

Easy. You add an extension to your stick that matches the shape of the stick in the plane. Done and done. The location of the base is correct.

It’s also really uncomfortable AND ergonomically difficult to input and sustain while being pulled out and away from all the controls even strapped in. Sims have a way of showing an accurate flight model when the human pilot’s limitations isn’t part of the system. op, you outside snap rolled an unbalanced plane. Try to keep your speed up and don’t cross control at high AoA. High wingloading can be suddenly unforgiving.

No light? Like the probe isn’t red? Or no light like it stinks at throwing light as bad as the position lights do? Also is the blackout switch on the throttle switched? Don’t remember if that does or doesn’t do the probe light.

Can’t complain it doesn’t look wrong when it doesn’t work at all.

That’s an ED super carrier issue.

Well you can lan together, you don’t need to be on a remote server. One of the computers just runs as host. But that doesn’t fix the sync issues because it’s still doing the same thing across a crossover cable, or across the internet.

It’s ok, It’s a computer game. All of it is make believe, so it not being the right Block for a paint job isn’t more unrealistic.

I suspect, like many things, it’s a half Heatblur, half ED kind if problem. Meaning, don’t hold your breath.

Probably an AWG9 thing. Hence why there is a button to toggle track hold on/off. The AWG-9 probably isn’t smart enough to think like that on its own. 1969 first Integrated Chip electronics remember. Like with actual CORE memory.

Reason is, the sidewinder is talking directly through DirectX and the Brunner is sneaking data out the back door. I don’t know why Brunner refuses to cobble together a DirectX interface for their driver software, probably some kind of licensing or old documentation or something, who knows, or they just don’t care. For the price, they could have at least tried. But, their primary customer uses non DirectX for control loading so they probably don’t see the point. A directX to Brunner translator would be a valuable utility for anyone who can actually code in grownup, not python.

This was probably the work around to get it to stop flying swept with flaps down. Just forcing a flaps up argument every AI “frame”

You have to make two different display profiles one for F-14 Pilot and one for F-14 RIO because DCS won’t suppress the screens in the seat you aren’t in. It’s a pain.

Yea it’s an unfortunate limitation of how DCS uses displays.

You should try a repair of DCS. Looks like your update went a bit wrong.

The CNC will be more useful to you. The plates are Engraved clear acrylic painted white then black on an aluminum base plate with backlights. Only 3d print weird, specialized shapes if you can manage. Bend Sheet metal or foam core where you can. With that size printer, knobs and such. And the analog dials mostly.

We not using OVGME any more?

Best practice is to just report both places.

Exactly. Super Carrier is barely early access and seemingly low priority. They still haven’t gotten new missile stuff to 3rd party yet

I believe right lower side with the rest of the Countermeasures setup.

I mean, performance from whenever they originally made 2.0. Problem is all this stuff gets grouped in with “vulkan coming soon” which has been years now. I don’t blame them not wanting to do the same work twice, but well, if it never gets done, it’s not really done twice.

Gear Down.

Which is fine, until the sun starts going down. Then you're either blind in the cockpit view, or too dim on the exported screen.

It's dimmer unless you F2 to the external view, then it's the correct brightness. No idea why.

Are there any Milsim or milsim light Tomcat squadrons flying off the Forestall and not the super carrier? Looking to do some solid 80’s Cold war especially given the upcoming maps and plane modules on the horizon.

It’s not up to Heatblur. Supercarrier and its features are an Eagle Dynamics product. If ED wants to let third parties use the SC assets, THEY have to do something they are historically loathe to do, which is make a documented API and provide their code. They aren’t that kind of company. So the alternative is you have to wait for ED and ONLY ED to step up. Which, how long have we been waiting for the SC to set up a Tomcat specific Ball? Or LSO grading for the F-14? Heck, how many YEARS now has the “new missile API” been just around the corner?