Tom Kazansky

Hi, first of all, it is helpful to know that DCS stepped away from the old key number system some years ago. Today all your modules are connected to your account. So you don't need keys anymore to install modules. All you have to do is start the module manager on top of the DCS menu. Here is a nice and short video you might want to take a look at. It covers the buying process (you don't need) and from 1 min 3s on it shows where to find the module manager. In you case you want to select installed modules within the module manager to check for the spitfire.

Have you tried to delete the binding for the TDC? Does it still drift afterwards? If so, you may want to delete the whole set of bindings of that device (on top of its column). Restart DCS and rebind the keys.

und nicht wundern: die Modifikatoren, die man eventuell erstellt hat, werden so nicht mit gespeichert. (Einfach neu machen oder wie in den threads, die @rforce oben gepostet hat beschrieben ist, die "modifiers.lua" im "input" Ordner wiederherstellen.)

From today's changelog: Better late than never. Thanks.

Ich geb dir einerseits recht. Wenn man aber solche Missionen in einer multi player dynamic campaign gegen wichtige (d.h. gut verteidigte) Ziele selber plant und ausführt, kann das schon sehr spannend sein. Die F-117 ist ja auch in echt nicht "unsichtbar", wie man nicht nur 1999 über Jugoslawien gesehen hat.

it is Ugra Media:

To me that's exactly the reason for buying and flying a DCS module. Simulating the shortcomings is as important as simulating an aircraft's strengths. The revolutionary Me 262 would be extremely interesting in both regards. (Btw, I hope you at ED get enough information about the shortcomings of the F-35A, that would add a lot to the credibility of this project, imho.)

Ja, das hat das Video bei mir auch ausgelöst. Tut gut.

BO-105 and Germany map in the same year would be... delicious.

FF F-15C Eagle. Thank you ED! Great news. Germany map (by Ugra Media?!) is a no brainer, too for me. F-35A is gonna be an interesting journey to unknown territory. I will keep a critical eye on it, but most probably from an owner's point of view. I have a lots of "When?"s here. But you will share news as soon as there are news.... I know and I keep looking forward to that.

I'm not 100% fine with this decision but I've been through this process of making my mind up already with the Eurofighter. (Not exactly the same but close.) In the end I came to the conclusion that I want to fly the Eurofighter. I loved EF2000 from the 90's and how close to the real thing was that? I want to fly the closest simulation of an F-35 to the real thing in any sim, and I'm sure ED will deliver it. But I respect everybody's opinion that fears to lose something by getting those kind of modules. So, I'm like 97% ok with it for myself, and that's enough fo me to buy it

Another big thank you here. Can't wait to finally push all those buttons.

Auch wenn's nur die AI wäre, gibt es wohl nach der F-35A Bombe Hoffnung für jedes Flugzeug.

Wow... "Blüh' im Glanze..."

Don't know if it is related but here is a thread with a similar issue and a solution:

Some day ED should add a warning to those licence error windows, to check for anti virus software exclusions. There are so many threads with this kind of problem and the same solution, including my own some time ago. And this won't be the last one I'm afraid. Don't get me wrong, I appreciate every one of those threads, bc they show there is a systematic problem with DCS that could occur to anybody (who hasn't made the exclusions before). (Never ever had such an issue with any other game/software.)

Sagt bitte Bescheid wenn aus der "Pimax Crystal naja" eine Pimax Crystal Super gemacht wurde.

Does this always happen while loading the Mi-24P or are other modules also affected?

+1

...beautiful

The heading shown on the compass on the first cockpit picture supports your finding as well.

If it is good for ED to get less of my money per year they should change pricing to monthly subscription model.

Yeah, that's the major pain. By solving this single issue a lot of "attention" could be taken from the current state of the ATC until the overhaul is finished and released some day.

Is it possible to use the "swarm"? I.e. let's say a certain amount of long time users without warnings report content of a certain user as spam makes the content of the spammer invisible at least in the "unread content" section of the forum automatically until a moderator can take a look at him and take further action? edit: in the meantime Quincy cracked the 100

He's not the only one today. Reported via the 3 dots on one of their spam. Maybe some day a new user will not be able to spam 46* posts with nearly identical content in minutes any more, I hope. *edit: 70 and counting... ... now 80 with up to 2 to 3 new topics per minute. Couldn't the amount of new topics per minute be reduced for new users to a reasonable amount?