Shimmergloom667

Haha, I like how you suggest that razbam suddenly knows how to model complex stuff :D

Now I'm hoping it will be delayed so all the folks announcing their leaving will actually go :cheer3nc:

You absolutely DO have a say what emitter the SP mode should go for - you can cycle the targeted emitter with RAID/FLIR FOV select, too.

Because that will at some point be implemented with the Data Cartridge for the Hornet.

It was pretty damn accurate before, now it's basically laser accurate

Hey @lex! I'd like to point you to our vVFA squad: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=266916 We are Europe-based with members from Scotland, Norway, Belgium, Italy and actually a bunch of Swiss, Austrians and Germans. We focus on the Hornet and will probably give the Supercarrier a heavy emphasis. Also, while we try to fly things "by the book" as much as possible, und have training events from CASE I - III, JTAC/FAC(a) etc. following real world procedures as much as possible, we also try to not lose the "fun" factor from sight and certainly don't follow a "rank structure". If interested, why not send the OP in the thread I linked a PM and hop over on our Discord and have a chat with him? :) Cheers!

Exaggerated expectations? Two weeks? Dude, some of the bugs are months and YEARS old. Since when is the expectation of bugs getting actually fixed "exaggerated"?

Well, HB is actually fixing a lot of bugs, which is why people are rightfully cutting them some slack for stuff like more keybinds. Razbam is adding a few new features piecemeal, but glaring bugs and missing functonality stick around for months and months, which is why their paying customers are getting rightfully annoyed.

This has been like that since day 1

Deka seems to be able to do a lot of stuff that Razbam can't. Fix bugs e.g.

Nah, I see it too, no probs

I didn't experience any changes whatsoever

While I find 11€ to be perfectly reasonable: I absolutely, 100% need to be sure this works with SRS. Is that still an open question?

Holy shit, are there REALLY people whining about bugs and fixes when we are getting ONE funny easter egg a year. What the hell is wrong with you people?

https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=267685

No bug: REDFOR planes can't use GPS unless specifically set in Mission Editor https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=250276

It's almost as if all 3 Tranches were in use at once, at some point, with new birds being delivered. Crazy, I know.

Dude, they are at the very beginning of development.

Welcome aboard, Jan - you made some wild dreams of mine come true today! :)

That's because that hasn't yet been announced. Their community manager will post FAQs later on: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=4260719&postcount=62 I am betting on Tranche 1 Block 5 or Tranche 2 Block 10 :)

You're welcome :)

It's an infrared laser beam visible through NVGs, that you can use to actively point out something to troops on the ground / other planes. It is not suited to weapons guidance, which is probably the reason for your never using it, yet.

INR is not infrared. INR is "Inertial", and just refers to the pod trying to stay focused to either a masked area (INR-A), or a masked point (INR-P) and both are already implemented. The infrared marking laser is implemented, too, you have to select MARK next to OSB 9 And if, by infrared, you mean BHOT or WHOT thermal optics: they have been in since day 1 of the Litening for the Hornet.

Area and point track do NOT do the same. Area track tracks, as the name implies, a certrain area on the ground and will stay pointed to that area through maneuvres. Point track tracks a hi contrast object, like a moving vehicle, and will stay focused on that. Both are modelled.

What bugs are you referring to, specifically?