falcon_120

Thanks for the help guys. I finally grabbed an Evga rtx 3090 Ftw3 for 899€, one that has been barely used (3 months old), and since I will grab it from a small PC components store they can invoice me the card as new to activate a 3 year warranty from evga. I'm located in Spain, given we have a 21% VAT 899€ is actually a good price I think, an rtx 3090 brand new is at 1300€ the lowest I can find in any online store, and in Amazon prices are ridicously high (I've see rtx 3090 at 2000€ :(! ) Regarding PSU and MB I have a 1000w HX1000 from corsair and a ROG STRIX b550-f gaming, I hope both will be OK for the new gpu once it arrives. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Some very interesting in-cockpit footage within the first minute. It's possible to see the radar display and link16 symbology. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

When should we start getting the first real benchmarks from specialised content creators? Really looking forward to see how it compares not only against the 4090 but also against the previous generation (3090 & ti specially).

Hello, So seeking some advice. I have the opportunity to get some Rtx 3090 second hand gpu; with less than 1 year of use no mining and 2 year warranty, for around 850/900€, also it's possible to get an Rx 6950 xt new for 945€. My main use will be DCS in vr in the reverb g2, other games I play does not require strong gpus so I just want the best card for the vr experience in DCS. Also i will look tonight in case AMD rx 7000 turns out to be affordable (don't want to spend >1700 €). What are your thoughts guys ? BTW I'm upgrading from a 1080ti Regards, Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Hello, Recently I've been playing a bit more with the hornet in practice missions setups simulating non MSI/non link 16 scenario and i've noticed a change in the logic on how to stt a search brick when in RWS. Currently, once you get a seach hit in RWS, you cant just place the TDC over the brick and command a Target control switch depress to try get an STT lock right away, instead you need to wait several sweeps in order to generate a track that you can now STT, either by hitting twice Target designator depress (1-To make the target your PDT track and later to go to STT), or either by placibg the TDC cursor over the track and go SCS right (asuming RDR on the right MFD)). Is this behavior intended? In the past i remember that when in RWS, a TMS depress would command a search raster trying to lock whatever was in the TDC heading, which made an STT lock faster. Regards,

Too many sad souls in this thread. It's like the grinch trying to steal Christmas. I enjoyed it ED. Don't think it's out of place once a year. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Call it like you want, but you have made yourself sound like an irritated boy that has been grounded/off his toy. I like being informed when a patch is PLANNED. Other than that, this sh*t happens in software engineering when you are building a version, regression testing it and UAT testing it to go live, sometimes you detect important issues you just can't sort in 1 day. It is what it is... its not like it happens to ED a lot, normally everything goes smoothly.

Shouldn't you just jump on DCS and try yourself better? I said last time I Checked myself. Also check these, in both the hornet and vipers turn out as superior 2 circle fighter against the mirage (in DCS i mean), so all in order right regarding your OP claim? [/url] Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Last time I checked the viper ate the m2000 alive in a 2 circle fight in DCS, particularly after the latest changes to the viper. Isn't that so? Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Alternate Marianas? What is that ? [emoji2955] Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Have you tried them already? They are quite straight forward. So I will try to explain how they work now in DCS: -If you are in mode 1/2 (deception mode), the jammer will break the lock of any aircraft of SAM once they have locked you, and given you are at a certain distance (meaning if you are too close they won't do a thing). This mode is currently working in the same way as the hornet SPJ. -Difference of mode 1 and 2 are radar priority or jammer priority. -If you are in mode 3 (noise jammer), the ecm will work as all FC3 aircraft ECMs, this is, it will deny range information until burnthrough range. It will also deny lofting of Fox 3 missile if they are launched outside burnthrough range. I think I dont miss anything about DCS current implementation. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

There is one positive thing of turning on your noise jammer, it will deny lofting to Fox 3 (sd10 and Amraam at least) hugely reducing the range even at altitude. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

I'm in the same situation as you, I am thinking is it makes sense to buy a 3090ti that I can get for 1300€ in Spain, but I'm also eagerly waiting to see price and reviews of the rtx 4080 and the new Amd gpus to take a final decision.... My 1080ti is holding with dignity but the reverb G2 is asking too much of her XD... Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

What purpose would it have in DCS anyway? Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Do not feed this never ending argument again. The history is clear, the Phoenix was designed to deal with the threat of soviet bombers, but they did it so well with its design that is was indeed very capable against fighters. Later on with the Aim54 c it was clear it would need to engage fighters so it was improved for that. Recently I heard an interview of former F14 pilot Puck, explaining this, and the differences between the Phoenix and the amraam, also how they trained to use it against fighters in red flag I leave the link below. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

What is your point? In the context of a Simulator? This is not war thunder Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

it's a double edge sword, it would be like you state for a pylon free, clean f16, on the other hand a fully loaded aircraft, with fuel pylons, bombs, missiles hanging from the wings (like normally most players are flying in any server) could be detected much farther away. But yeah, it would be an additional step to a more realistic EW environment. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Wondering about this topic as well. Specially curious since Razbam and Deka introduced in some of the latest patches RCS dependcy on stores and aspects. I have no idea what exactly they have implemented or to what degree but several question arises: How is this affecting other modules? How did they manage to simulate that without an internal discussion with ED first? . Again this is a thing that should be somehow centralized in ED for an homogeneous simulation. At least at an software architecture level, to make sure the way of implementing that could be scalable in the future if ED decides to implement the functionality themselves. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Well, put into perspective the hornet is like 90%-95% complete even in this EA state and that is already more complex that some full games out there. I don't doubt ED will always provide support the hornet and will finish what is left. So nothing to be worried about and no reason to stop supporting them in the future at least IMHO. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Perhaps he was looking for this Just kidding, as someone else suggested always use the 2 week free trial for every module, it is great. Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Couldn't it be that ccrp for gbu 24 (if no laser is detected) is designed to enter the laser basket, not hit the target? It makes sense to me that way, so the bomb during the last part of the path If no laser is detected, is aimed to the center of the basket which should be a bit before the target itself... meaning that if no laser is detected it will hit a bit short Don't know if I made myself clear... Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

Ok Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

What I suspect is, ED has a modern fighter team dedicated to the F18/F16 and other projects, from experience they usually work in sprints. As of now given recent updates, the team is making a hard push at the F16, meaning probably there is 1/2 people not full time on the hornet, or maybe just 1 for bug squashing. After the big F16 push is finished, which could be already, the modern fighter teams moves again to the hornet and other project to finish remaining items, mostly FM, loft modes and hopefully revisiting some implementations (MSI/track files/ look down radar capabilities) Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk

In which world does someone learn to cold start a new aircraft in 3 min? Are you a MIT/Harvard student? :/ Enviado desde mi ELE-L29 mediante Tapatalk