Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I believe there is a Sea Fury in the list from VEAO. That will be carrier capable too. A Seafire isn't beyond the realms of possibility either.

 

Maybe the Skiyhawk. Phantom, Buccaneer, may become more compelling, and get that extra little push into reality they lack right now.

 

We can dream I guess, but carrier operations at the level of realism we have in DCS World - now that IS a lure for a lot more customers.

Posted (edited)
Hopefully this will lead to a Naval Combined Arms simulator someday.I hope we get the Harpoon ASM with the Hornet so we can sink the Russian carrier and it's supporting fleet.

 

A Hornet without the Harpoon wouldn't make much sense, but we'd need the supporting fleet first (e.g. Sovremenny, Udaloy destroyer classes, some frigates like Krivak class, perhaps updated/new models of Slava and Kirov classes, etc.).

 

somebody make Mig-29K please......

 

Which one? The old prototypes (9.31) which were tested on the Kuznetsov class never went into the production, while the new K's are radically different (based on the new M/M2 series with the unified canopy) and probably too new to simulate (the Russian variant is not in service yet).

 

Personally, I would love to have the old single-seat variant, but somehow I don't see that happening. :(

Edited by Dudikoff

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Posted

So many hopeful wishes and dreams are easy to understand. But we should not let ourselves get carried away and then be disappointed. Let us remember, the only thing they said was that we could walk around on detailed Carrier. They didn't say, that we cut operate these systems as I understood (hope I´m wrong). Although it would be fatastisk if many of these wet dreams came true. I would like that

 

Anyway I´m looking forward to all these great things, that will happen in 2016 as described in the newsletter "DCS World Future" It´s going to be fantastic for all of us one way or the other :smilewink:

Intel I7 4770K, Evga 1080 FE, win10 64Pro, 32GB ram, TracIR 5, Hotas Warthog, MFD Cougar x2, MFG Crosswind

Posted (edited)
A Hornet without the Harpoon wouldn't make much sense, but we'd need the supporting fleet first (e.g. Sovremenny, Udaloy destroyer classes, some frigates like Krivak class, perhaps updated/new models of Slava and Kirov classes, etc.).

 

The Slava was updated two years ago.

http://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2247078&postcount=341

 

The only part not updated on updated ships (molniya, ticonderoga crisers, OH. Perry, Slava) has no antisubmarine weapons functionality (torpedo, rockets, VLS weapons), no ECM and countermeasures on ships (deployed and towed).

Edited by Silver_Dragon

For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF

Posted
Current: Su-33, any helicopter (sort of).

 

Future: Tomcat, Hornet, Harrier, (probably) Corsair, Bearcat, (maybe) Vampire, (maybe) Hawk (if somebody does a Goshawk mod).

 

Back in the LOMAC days, there was a MiG-29K mod, and an Su-25UTG. DOn't know if we'll get those again though...

 

I think that RAZBAM also plans on doing the A-7E at some point. :thumbup:

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted
Current: Su-33, any helicopter (sort of).

 

Future: Tomcat, Hornet, Harrier, (probably) Corsair, Bearcat, (maybe) Vampire, (maybe) Hawk (if somebody does a Goshawk mod).

 

Back in the LOMAC days, there was a MiG-29K mod, and an Su-25UTG. DOn't know if we'll get those again though...

 

If razbam is still actually doing the T2 buckeye it can do carrier ops as well.

Check my F-15C guide

Posted

The Razbam T2 was cancelled.

For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF

Posted
The Razbam T2 was cancelled.

 

ok thanks for the heads-up. I wasn't actively following it's progress. I just checked if its forum was still there and it was. it was a naval trainer after all.

Check my F-15C guide

Posted
I joined the wrong Navy. All we got was Starbucks.

 

In the 1980's I ran the "FANTAIL CLUB" on USS Carl Vinson. 6 bottles of Jack Danials smuggled onboard in a cruise box.

Posted
Harrier and British Carrier=Bar!

 

I have Lusty plans...

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

https://ko-fi.com/joey45

 

Posted
For the Nimitz class, I'm thinking probably island and O-3 through hangar bay deck only, which would give us ready rooms, the dirty shirt wardroom, catapult/ arresting gear spaces, CATCC, CVIC, SSES, CDC, Maintenance Control, Strike Ops Planning, and various shops. Oh, and the barber shop, the f'o'c'sl, and the TV studio. And 2 of the three gyms.

 

As soon as you drop below the hangar bay things get horrifyingly complex very, very quickly, with all the divisional offices, machinery spaces, switchboard rooms, mess decks fore and aft, main medical, the bowling alley...

 

So, if you don't go to the gym, the plane becomes harder to fly? :megalol:

Posted
What about a playable AirBoss, that way you control the Tower.

I'm hoping that with the new ATC, we won't need that. Because Case I/ Case III recoveries, marshalling, sorting who to launch when, and respotting the deck for launches and recoveries will quickly turn into a nightmare for any player who hasn't completed at least an XO tour on a carrier.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Posted

I spent the last 3 months of my Navel career on the USS HORNET CVS-12. It is now a museum display in Alameda California. Got out in 1966. Visited the old ship 2 years ago..funny how your perception changes. I remember the bridge, think it was the 0-3 level and remembering it too be much larger.

 

The inertial navigation plot table as I also remember was actually small compared to what I remember. I found my initials I had scratched underneath the air search radar repeater. LOL Prior to this I spent 2 years in Vietnam. Carrier time is very interesting. At this time the Hornet was part of an anti-submarine warfare group. We also picked up the Apollo space capsule.

  • Like 1
Posted

Since were getting full 3D fidelity Russian & American carriers.I can't wait to see VEAO make a British carrier for their planes.I also want to see a French carrier too someday with a full 3D payware model like the Clemenceau or Foch or the CDG to go along with a flyable PFM/ASM Dassault Etendard IV/Super Etendard & Rafale or Breguet Alize.And maybe other nations with carriers from the past & present like the Japanese,Brazilian,Indian navies among others.

Posted
Since were getting full 3D fidelity Russian & American carriers.I can't wait to see VEAO make a British carrier for their planes.I also want to see a French carrier too someday with a full 3D payware model like the Clemenceau or Foch or the CDG to go along with a flyable PFM/ASM Dassault Etendard IV/Super Etendard & Rafale or Breguet Alize.And maybe other nations with carriers from the past & present like the Japanese,Brazilian,Indian navies among others.

 

I'd love to see an Invincible class - the issue is - no Harrier for it (well I've heard RAZBAM are doing a Gr.7/Gr.9)

Modules I own: F-14A/B, F-4E, Mi-24P, AJS 37, AV-8B N/A, F-5E-3, MiG-21bis, F-16CM, F/A-18C, Supercarrier, Mi-8MTV2, UH-1H, Mirage 2000C, FC3, MiG-15bis, Ka-50, A-10C (+ A-10C II), P-47D, P-51D, C-101, Yak-52, WWII Assets, CA, NS430, Hawk.

Terrains I own: South Atlantic, Syria, The Channel, SoH/PG, Marianas.

System:

GIGABYTE B650 AORUS ELITE AX, AMD Ryzen 5 7600, Corsair Vengeance DDR5-5200 32 GB, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070S FE, Western Digital Black SN850X 1 TB (DCS dedicated) & 2 TB NVMe SSDs, Corsair RM850X 850 W, NZXT H7 Flow, MSI G274CV.

Peripherals: VKB Gunfighter Mk.II w. MCG Pro, MFG Crosswind V3 Graphite, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro.

Posted

Well, the actually different between such many type of carries in the (real) world (for the pilot in DCS world) is the catapult, some type of carries have it, some others doesn't have it. You konw, the carrier is just a floating runway over the sea. If we can have two different ways to take off from carrier is totally enough for now environment(we only have few navy fighter for now, the key point is the airplane). I don't think it will have more fun to run a whole giant ship by one person than fly a bird at MP mission, there are over 5000 ppl in the nimitz or over 2000 ppl in the kuznetsov. The programmer team have much more important project need to be finished. Let them finished them and build more bird at first.

Posted
I'd love to see an Invincible class - the issue is - no Harrier for it (well I've heard RAZBAM are doing a Gr.7/Gr.9)

 

6BuncEu.jpg

 

Like this?:D

 

Getting them scanned this week.:pilotfly:

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

https://ko-fi.com/joey45

 

Posted
What about a playable AirBoss, that way you control the Tower.

 

Playable CATCC (Carrier Air Traffic Control Center) would be great, that is where the real work is done on the Carrier.

Posted

Have you got already the CVN selected ? 68 USS Nimitz ? 77 G.W. Bush ? A good point would be to slave Sea surface state to the selected wind speed/direction set on the Meteo options. We need Pitching Decks !

Also ressuply capability would be cool.

Posted
Have you got already the CVN selected ? 68 USS Nimitz ? 77 G.W. Bush ? A good point would be to slave Sea surface state to the selected wind speed/direction set on the Meteo options. We need Pitching Decks !

Also ressuply capability would be cool.

Aside from 76 and 77, they're all pretty much identical in terms of hull form any island. Interior for any of the class will be the same. Biggest difference on the flight deck would be Reagan and Bush only having 3 arresting wires.

 

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Posted

just to help things along a bit... very calm seas one day west of New Caledonia (Coral Sea) and not 'shopped'

1560254715_PacificBlue.thumb.jpg.22eddacaf6df80e9815197c2aab71996.jpg

City Hall is easier to fight, than a boys' club - an observation :P

"Resort is had to ridicule only when reason is against us." - Jefferson

"Give a group of potheads a bunch of weed and nothing to smoke out of, and they'll quickly turn into engineers... its simply amazing."

EVGA X99 FTW, EVGA GTX980Ti FTW, i7 5930K, 16Gb Corsair Dominator 2666Hz, Windows 7 Ultimate 64Bit, Intel 520 SSD x 2, Samsung PX2370 monitor and all the other toys

-

"I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar"

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...