Jump to content

IMHO in nonpoint AG strike, using any weapon other then JSOW is a waste of airframe


Recommended Posts

Posted

IMHO in non-pinpoint AG strike, using any weapon other then JSOW is a waste of airframe.

 

JSOW is incredibly effective weapon for non-pinpoint strike on formations. Even for point CAS missions, JSOW-C with unitary warhead is more effective then 65F.

Posted

If target is not defended. Seems to me, even Strelas and manpads try their best to intercept JSOWs, though they dont when engaged by mavericks.

 

thats why JDAM has become the weapon of choice. When tgt is stationary, of course

 

And another point against JSOW is huge amount of drag when using doble racks.

 

IMHO as always.

Posted

JSOW C, more than US$ 700,000

JDAM, LBG, around US$ 20-25,000

AGM-65, cost tops out at slightly above US$ 100,000

Just saying. It's up to you to decide if you want to use realistic loadouts or not. There's no way they'd give you a JSOW if the job can be done with a JDAM, for example.

The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord.

CVW-17_Profile_Background_VFA-34.png

F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3
-
i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro

Posted

also, how many were bought? LGB's are way more common than JSOW. In game may not matter at all. But in real, the number available could vary drastically. Suddenly that JSOW is a rarity, and maybe you don't want to expend them on low value targets easily defeated with cheap common ordnance.

Posted
IMHO in non-pinpoint AG strike, using any weapon other then JSOW is a waste of airframe.

 

JSOW is incredibly effective weapon for non-pinpoint strike on formations. Even for point CAS missions, JSOW-C with unitary warhead is more effective then 65F.

Try hitting a moving target with it.

Posted
thats why JDAM has become the weapon of choice. When tgt is stationary, of course

Or LJDAM nowadays, which can target moving targets as well.

Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit

DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!

Tornado3 small.jpg

Posted
Or LJDAM nowadays, which can target moving targets as well.
I mean DCS and here we have only INS/GPS ones :)

 

RL is beautiful, no doubt.

Posted

All airframes are waste if they can't drop a tactical nuclear to simply devastate the enemy and tell them who they are against.....

i7-8700k, 32GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 2x 2080S SLI 8GB, Oculus Rift S.

i7-8700k, 16GB 2666Mhz DDR4, 1080Ti 11GB, 27" 4K, 65" HDR 4K.

Posted

Just hack their govts and leak their private chats. More effective than any weapon nowadays rdlaugh.png

 

In DCS one JSOW is being misused constantly instead of cracking up bunkers and the other is a nice set of fireworks, but literally doesn't deal any damage at all which is why the first is done.

dcsdashie-hb-ed.jpg

 

Posted
IMHO in non-pinpoint AG strike, using any weapon other then JSOW is a waste of airframe.

 

JSOW is incredibly effective weapon for non-pinpoint strike on formations. Even for point CAS missions, JSOW-C with unitary warhead is more effective then 65F.

 

So you're the kind of person that loads 8x jsows :lol:

Posted
So you're the kind of person that loads 8x jsows :lol:

 

uhoh i have been doing it wrong since JSOWs were introduced. since we do not have to pay anything, the cost is irrelevant. i personally like to load 8, get rid of the AA, then go back to finish up the helpless ground targets with something different after reload. though it is an interesting point. what if we had a budget and had to be aware of costs? maybe a wish list for the ME.

AKA_SilverDevil Join AKA Wardogs Email Address My YouTube

“The MIGS came up, the MIGS were aggressive, we tangled, they lost.”

- Robin Olds - An American fighter pilot. He was a triple ace.

The only man to ever record a confirmed kill while in glide mode.

Posted
uhoh i have been doing it wrong since JSOWs were introduced. since we do not have to pay anything, the cost is irrelevant. i personally like to load 8, get rid of the AA, then go back to finish up the helpless ground targets with something different after reload. though it is an interesting point. what if we had a budget and had to be aware of costs? maybe a wish list for the ME.
It's already possible to limit the number of available weapons in the ME. And weapon availability should also definitely be a thing once the dynamic campaign is implemented.

The vCVW-17 is looking for Hornet and Tomcat pilots and RIOs. Join the vCVW-17 Discord.

CVW-17_Profile_Background_VFA-34.png

F/A-18C, F-15E, AV-8B, F-16C, JF-17, A-10C/CII, M-2000C, F-14, AH-64D, BS2, UH-1H, P-51D, Sptifire, FC3
-
i9-13900K, 64GB @6400MHz RAM, 4090 Strix OC, Samsung 990 Pro

Posted

Seeing people with 8xJSAWs seems a lot unrealistic,

 

on any real combat footage there is out there you can see one or two of those destined to hit some high value target, same goes with harpoons, slams, even gbu12 are not loaded in high numbers on one airframe.

Posted

JSOWs get picked out of the sky like flies by SA-15s and SA-10s. Your point is incredibly invalid

Intel i7 9700k CPU

Nvidia GTX 1080Ti

16GB RAM

Samsung 256GB SSD

Thrustmaster T16000m HOTAS

Posted
JSOWs get picked out of the sky like flies by SA-15s and SA-10s. Your point is incredibly invalid

 

If your targets are not these types or protected by these types, it works great. To your point I have seen both AIM120s and AIM9 shot at low flying helicopters get shot down by some sort of 23-4. Same units ignored the JSOWs.

AKA_SilverDevil Join AKA Wardogs Email Address My YouTube

“The MIGS came up, the MIGS were aggressive, we tangled, they lost.”

- Robin Olds - An American fighter pilot. He was a triple ace.

The only man to ever record a confirmed kill while in glide mode.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...