tugais

I've been flying the Gazelle with another fellow co-pilot on a regular basis since last August. We got the prompt window every single time. Polychop or ED probably fixed it months ago.

I'd love to see some love thrown at air to ground ordnance, these Belougas and BAP/BAT could be a real treat for Mirage users. Once, the work on the systems are done, a "little" extra work on these bombs would be the icing on the cake.

Well, they said in the past they could not offer the original Crimean region because of politics. I guess this kind of restriction would apply to others markets they value or try to get into.

Thank you for keeping this mod up to date, greatly appreciated !

Hi guys, Hoping that someone from Eagle Dynamics read this thread. It would be great to update the actual official manual to include the latest updates/upgrades on the Hornet. Apparently it's been a while since it has been done and I can't rely on Youtube videos to learn how to fly the module. Thanks

The use of Tacview is highly recommended if you want to understand what parameters weren't right. Practice makes perfect.

Looking forward to the next update about these new devices from Virpil. The release of the Kiowa, the Mi-24, the Back Shark 3 in the near future will certainly open new opportunities to the company.

Hi there ! Lately I'm flying a lot in a multicrewed Gazelle. We noticed that the co-pilot cannot change the radios by himself and needs to rely on the pilot to do it. Is there a way to implement a function to allow the co-pilot to switch from one radio to another ? Thank you.

Hi Ansirial ! As I'm logging more shared cockpit time, I'd love to have a way to track my time as a copilot/pilot. Do you think you could add an option to specify a multicrew use for the aircrafts allowing it, perhaps a dropdown menu with the pilot or copilot to choose from ? Also, it could be a cool new statistic IMO (who does not love stats ? xD). Thank you again for your time and work on this amazing tool !

Hello Polychop team ! I was wondering if you could take a look at the the radios after the Kiowa release. Currently, in multicrew, the co-pilot cannot use the UHF/VHF radios. From what I read in various books about the french Gazelle pilots, the chef de bord should be the one using these radios as the senior officer and the tactical coordinator. Thank you ! Edit : Please disregard my request. I think the problem comes from SRS.

Thank you for keeping them updated. They should be included in the base game IMO, did you ever thought about reaching out for ED ?

I can't see why RealSimulator would damage their perfect record regarding very high quality products. Their product range comes at a cost but they always delivered great products.

Dear Razbam team, Can we get a "Craack" sound to be included in the module and bindable please ? Thank you.

Hi, Would you introduce your team and your past and present projects/products so people might know you a little bit more and decide if they would commit to your Viper throttle ? Thank you.

Promoting your own product in this thread is kind of … meh. Perhaps a new topic on the main Input section would have been more appropriate. Just sayin'

This is worrisome, I do hope Winwing will comment on this if they still visit this section of the forum.

I honestly don't see the point to these messages too as the team already said they are going to build from the ground a new FM thanks to their new experience with the Kiowa module.

Yeah, don't forget the four helos, the Bo-105, a heavy US helicopter and two medium european helicopters. They have a lot on their plate. Source : Air Combat Sim Podcast #9 transcription Edit : Also, is the -5 mentioned by Decoy a typo ?

And here we are, fellow Mirage pilots with a 5 years old module and still waiting for its completion. Be reassured, once the fourth year mark behind you, you won't react anymore and just wait for the module being feature complete. Keep faith and vote with your wallets my friends !

They said a few times they will come back to the Gazelle FM once the Kiowa has been released.

I did not, indeed, tried the new Syria theater, I fly only stable branch. Let's note that Syria is not even deployed for regular users and that the main TO is still Georgia. As for ISIS, we don't even have proper support for an insurgent faction - no pickups, no VBIEDs, no "support teams". Again, screaming for realism about airplanes but not their environment seems a bit artificial to me. As for the hanging part, I probably did not made myself clear, I'm sorry. I'm not asking for an impossible loadout, just one that could actually be real. Let's take the example of the Mk83 not being fielded by a branch but being used by another branch of the same country air force. I'll not even talk about your attempt to make fun with absurd anachonism. I shared my point of view anyway, no need to comment further on this topic.

Oh, I see. Double standards. Crying for realism about believable loadouts being negated but not about actual geopolitics. Make sense.

How do you manage the fact that DCS does not offer any realistic scenario ? Isn't it silly to offer a simulation with absolute non sense in regards of geopolitics ? When was the last time we saw Soviet/Russian planes engaged in a conflict against western air forces over Georgia ? Please, this is a game first and foremost, let's not forget it. The point of this game is to explore the realm of possibilities within the constraints of the hardware available. I firmly believe that a weapon should be available on a platform if it is possible to mount it IRL. If the weapon requires a specific system/hardware update, then sure, it shouldn't be available ; but if a plane could carry an ordinance without software update or hardware modifications, then why not offering it ? Let explore different doctrines if we can do it.

Thank you for the update.

The people involved in the creation of the map and the assets are not the same working on the aircrafts.