Boberro Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 Let me think.... TOR, Tunguska, Roland, Chaparral, Avenger, Striela, Shilka, Bradley Enter the vehicle Aim Fire Watch burning sky :D Reminder: Fighter pilots make movies. Bomber pilots make... HISTORY! :D | Also to be remembered: FRENCH TANKS HAVE ONE GEAR FORWARD AND FIVE BACKWARD :D ಠ_ಠ ツ
71st_Mastiff Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 this shot reminds me of SoCal....During NTC FT. Irwin Dessert war fair center. oh the memories. I still have my maps of the entire Base.. mmm maybe when Nevada comes out FT.Irwin will be there? its just southwest of the nevada state line. "any failure you meet, is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back", W Forbes. "Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts", "He who never changes his mind, never changes anything," Winston Churchill. MSI z690 MPG DDR4 || i9-14900k|| ddr4-64gb PC3200 |zotac RTX 5080|Game max 1300w|Win11| |turtle beach elite pro 5.1|| ViRpiL,T50cm2||MFG Crosswinds|| VT50CM-plus rotor Throttle || Z10 RGB EVGA Keyboard/ G502LogiMouse || PiMax Crystal VR || 32 Asus||
gunterlund21 Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 ok the $65 question is will the Russians have a FAC/JTAC capability for the Ka or SU? I was in Art of the Kill D#@ it!!!!
Nate--IRL-- Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 ok the $65 question is will the Russians have a FAC/JTAC capability for the Ka or SU? Combined arms provides for Human JTAC/FAC in MP DCS - the AI has not changed in this regard. Nate Ka-50 AutoPilot/stabilisation system description and operation by IvanK- Essential Reading
DiCE81 Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 ok the $65 question is will the Russians have a FAC/JTAC capability for the Ka or SU? I think the SU-25T, but i'm not sure
Impact Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 Hah! Looks just like Arma 2. ------=:: I FLY BLEIFREI ::=------
Sceptre Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 Hah! Looks just like Arma 2. It does! I can't believe this started out as a helicopter sim. I am looking forward to see how far DCS can go! RTX 2070 8GB | 32GB DDR4 2666 RAM | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 4.2Ghz | Asrock X570 | CH Fighterstick/Pro Throttle | TM MFDs | TrackIR 5
ED Team Wags Posted June 3, 2012 ED Team Posted June 3, 2012 Hah! Looks just like Arma 2. We will take that as a compliment. I think Arma2 has great terrain detail. Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/wagmatt Twitch: wagmatt System: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3729544#post3729544
HiJack Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 With Combined Arms and human control of units I guess there will be more units moved in to cover. Cover behind threes and buildings and not be sitting openly on the field. SAM will be more of a challenge I hope and Manpads lurking together with softer units. The "Hide & seek" game will be a completly new area of this sim now. (HJ)
Panzertard Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 With Combined Arms and human control of units I guess there will be more units moved in to cover. Cover behind threes and buildings and not be sitting openly on the field. SAM will be more of a challenge I hope and Manpads lurking together with softer units. The "Hide & seek" game will be a completly new area of this sim now. (HJ) Congrats - you'll be able to be on the receiving end of a CBU-97. We all be able to get some new perspectives. PS: Look up! The mind is like a parachute. It only works when it's open | The important thing is not to stop questioning
HiJack Posted June 3, 2012 Posted June 3, 2012 Congrats - you'll be able to be on the receiving end of a CBU-97. We all be able to get some new perspectives. PS: Look up! LOL :D
Heks-Hunter Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Nice to see all the new developments!will the CA vehicles be controllable by joystick or keyboard?...any other functions like lights,doors,smoke.i want to drive a vehicle into a c17 for transport ; ) We need a interface for all the cockpit builders!!!e.g.working MFDs and real gauges... (IRIS)!?
gunterlund21 Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Another question. Will the combined arms commander have the ability to command units that activate after the game has commenced. So let say a unit does'nt activate for 15 minutes after the mission starts. Can we take command of them? I was in Art of the Kill D#@ it!!!!
gunterlund21 Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Combined arms provides for Human JTAC/FAC in MP DCS - the AI has not changed in this regard. Nate Ok let me rephrase this. Will the Russian JTAC have the ability to lase for the SU or KA. I was in Art of the Kill D#@ it!!!!
diveplane Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Nice to see all the new developments!will the CA vehicles be controllable by joystick or keyboard?...any other functions like lights,doors,smoke.i want to drive a vehicle into a c17 for transport ; ) We need a interface for all the cockpit builders!!!e.g.working MFDs and real gauges... (IRIS)!? all in good time we will have detailed ground unit interiors, just like the aircraft cockpits. this is the start to new times in dcs world universe. nearest to high level details in tanks is steel beasts pro pe, but now we have combined arms, nothing stopping it to having the same details in ground units. https://www.youtube.com/user/diveplane11 DCS Audio Modding.
Sceptre Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 In DCS, I think that all the tanks are better detailed than in ArmA 2 which is bloody impressive. This Combined Arms module has got a bright future. RTX 2070 8GB | 32GB DDR4 2666 RAM | AMD Ryzen 5 3600 4.2Ghz | Asrock X570 | CH Fighterstick/Pro Throttle | TM MFDs | TrackIR 5
EtherealN Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 (edited) Ok let me rephrase this. Will the Russian JTAC have the ability to lase for the SU or KA. He won't be lasing for Vikhr delivery at least. ;) Remember: those are beamriders, it would pretty much be a violation of all known laws of physics if anyone other than the launch platform lased them. ;) In case you are unfamiliar: laser-guided Mavericks and Hellfires (as examples) have a detector in the nose that looks for the reflection of the laser to find it's target. Beamriders like the Vikhr instead have the detector in the rear, where they look for a laser "grid" that is projected from the launch platform, whereafter it maneuvers to stay in the middle of this grid. (Thus the spiraling motion typical of the Vikhrs.) Therefore, the Vikhr can only be guided by something that is immediately behind it at launch, which usually is the launching aircraft. This is also the reason why the Vikhr may go "dumb" if you have a lot of sideways motion at the moment of launch; it'll fail to intercept the laser grid and never have any guidance. Edited June 4, 2012 by EtherealN [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Daniel "EtherealN" Agorander | Даниэль "эфирныйн" Агорандер Intel i7 2600K @ 4.4GHz, ASUS Sabertooth P67, 8GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600MHz, ASUS GTX 560Ti DirectCU II 1GB, Samsung 830series 512GB SSD, Corsair AX850w, two BENQ screens and TM HOTAS Warthog DCS: A-10C Warthog FAQ | DCS: P-51D FAQ | Remember to read the Forum Rules | | | Life of a Game Tester
gunterlund21 Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Hah Thanks Ether Was thinking more about the SU Laser guided bomb. Thanks. I was in Art of the Kill D#@ it!!!!
Teapot Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 In case you are unfamiliar: laser-guided Mavericks and Hellfires (as examples) have a detector in the nose that looks for the reflection of the laser to find it's target. Beamriders like the Vikhr instead have the detector in the rear, where they look for a laser "grid" that is projected from the launch platform, whereafter it maneuvers to stay in the middle of this grid. (Thus the spiraling motion typical of the Vikhrs.) Therefore, the Vikhr can only be guided by something that is immediately behind it at launch, which usually is the launching aircraft. This is also the reason why the Vikhr may go "dumb" if you have a lot of sideways motion at the moment of launch; it'll fail to intercept the laser grid and never have any guidance. I'm always amazed at the amount and quality of the handy hints I pick up from browsing these forums ... thanks! "A true 'sandbox flight sim' requires hi-fidelity flyable non-combat utility/support aircraft." Wishlist Terrains - Bigger maps Wishlist Modules - A variety of utility aircraft to better reflect the support role. E.g. Flying the Hornet ... big yawn ... flying a Caribou on a beer run to Singapore? Count me in. Extracting a Recon Patrol from a hastily prepared landing strip at a random 6 figure grid reference? Now yer talking!
SackDestroyer Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 So, when are we going to see DCS aircraft, Steel Beasts armor and ARMA infantry all in the same game? :music_whistling:
Pyroflash Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 So, when are we going to see DCS aircraft, Steel Beasts armor and ARMA infantry all in the same game? :music_whistling: Soon If you aim for the sky, you will never hit the ground.
Dmut Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 Let me think.... TOR, Tunguska, Roland, Chaparral, Avenger, Striela, Shilka, Bradley sorry, no Roland or Tor yet, may be later. "There are five dangerous faults which may affect a general: recklessness, which leads to destruction; cowardice, which leads to capture; a hasty temper, which can be provoked by insults; a delicacy of honor which is sensitive to shame; over-solicitude for his men, which exposes him to worry and trouble." Sun Tzu [sigpic]http://forums.eagle.ru/signaturepics/sigpic2354_5.gif[/sigpic]
Schnarre Aggro Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 sorry, no Roland or Tor yet, may be later. Gepard maybe ? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] There are two types of fighter pilots - those who have, and those who will execute a magnificent break turn towards a bug on the canopy . . . . http://www.youtube.com/user/schnarrsonvomdach http://www.twitch.tv/schnarre https://www.facebook.com/pages/Schnarre-Schnarrson/876084505743788?fref=ts
Keyser Posted June 4, 2012 Posted June 4, 2012 (edited) I read some speculation on this point, but so far not an official statement. When the announcement talks about "a first person armor warfare simulation", what level of realism does it imply? Will the symbology be the same as in the real thing, or will ground vehicles be simplified? Will there be driver and gunner positions? I think vehicles don't in general have the same level of complexity as airplanes, but how much of that will be realised? If the first release of CA will be more of a proof of concept, are there plans to release DCS-level fidelity modules also for vehicles, or allow them to be released by 3rd party devs? Edit: Think Hpasp's SAMSIM module for DCS Edited June 4, 2012 by Keyser
Eihort Posted June 5, 2012 Posted June 5, 2012 I know it was stated that we won't be able to control multi-unit SAMs (i.e. SA-10), but is this set in stone? I think it would be kind of fun to at least allow a human to control most SAM units on a side to replicate full on IADS since I've seen it stated the AI doesn't really do that.... provided of course that the HQ units required for such connectivity still exist. Multiple humans controlling multiple sam units via VOIP would be awesome. >:)
Recommended Posts