Vote for DCS level Su-25A

[splash]

+1. I love Su-25A/T. They're the planes I like to fly most. I'd pay more than for A-10C or Huey.

[skouras]

yeah why not

a full clickable cockpit for this aircraft

wait a minute

i say make all FC3 aircraft full clickable...;)

[Hetzer]

Please, do not talk "Su-25A" - it is incorrect, talk "Su-25".

[Rogue Trooper]

+ 1

[TurboHog]

I'm glad to see that so many people would like a DCS Su-25 or 25T.

 

Maybe this gets ED thinking...

[speckfire]

DCS SU-25A?

 

Absolutely

 

+11111111!!!!

[LostOblivion]

Please, do not talk "Su-25A" - it is incorrect, talk "Su-25".

 

Yes. To clarify, the Russians have a different naming convention for aircraft variants and mostly name their aircraft based on their function, whereas US aircraft are named after their counter version, starting at A. Thus, for US jets it makes sense to call the first version of an aircraft type "A", but not for Russian aircraft.

Edited August 8, 2013 by LostOblivion

[159th_Falcon]

Please, do not talk "Su-25A" - it is incorrect, talk "Su-25".

Problem is, a lot of people here don't know that, and assume SU-25T when talking SU-25.

hence i prefer using the A to make clear were talking about the SU-25 and not the T version.

 

(is there a more correct designation for the SU-25 that we can use?)

[martinistripes]

Any Su-25 at DCS level would be great, but I'd be more interested to try it with it's most recent upgrades.

[LostOblivion]

Problem is, a lot of people here don't know that, and assume SU-25T when talking SU-25.

hence i prefer using the A to make clear were talking about the SU-25 and not the T version.

 

(is there a more correct designation for the SU-25 that we can use?)

 

I guess you can use basic or base Su-25.

[Pepec9124]

Edit. Always read carefully before quoting. Tough lesson learned :D

Edited August 8, 2013 by Pepec9124

[eurofor]

I guess you can use basic or base Su-25.

 

Or "Su-25 (not T)" :D

[Pepec9124]

What about something new ?

Edit. Why image of carrier based version got deleted from my post ?

Edited August 9, 2013 by Pepec9124

[TaliG]

I vote TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT :ufo:

Because of the Vkrs and The SEAD capability.

Modelling the T first, will be easier for moders to take out the capabilities and do the 25a (same airframe) quickly

But UB will be even better (carrier training):thumbup:

[Dr_Arrow]

The best would be to have them all in one DCS pack: Su-25, Su-25T/TM, Su-25U (ok I could miss this one) and Su-25SM, :)

[Brisse]

If anyone eventually does take on this project, I think they will leave the Su-25 as it is and take on the Su-25SM as a DCS project.

[Boberro]

Su-25T !!!!

[muamshai]

Anything with DCS gets +1

Hell, if there were a DCS:Life of Hermit then it will get +1 too.

[BerkesAtti]

...definitely +1 for DCS level SU-25 !

[Cedaway]

I prefer they focus on their current projects, DCS:F/A-18c and completion of F-15c and SU-27sm for DCS World. Err, talking about this, can't find anymore if it will be a DCS: Su-27sm or Su-27sm for dcs world level of fidelity.

[Athlonic]

yeah why not

a full clickable cockpit for this aircraft

wait a minute

i say make all FC3 aircraft full clickable...;)

 

:thumbup:

 

This, and Oculus Rift support = Win Win Win !

[galagamo]

another yes regardless

[prefetch]

Su-25A & T sweet birds

 

count me in too

 

i love hitting rolling stock with cluster munitions

 

it really sooths my nerves

 

i would love to fly the new Mig comming soon also

 

and someday this beauty...

 

 

 

[redfish]

^+1

[Terrorvogel]

+1