All Activity

or! For the F4-U it's a total flip of the coin as to what way a switch/dial will flip. The F-16 is pretty good. -Ryan

any extra variant of the mig-21 the mag 3 team could add would be a very welcome miracle, i'd love to see an F-13 or PF particularly but wouldnt say no to something like an M/MF or others, just having it open the gate to the new scenarios would be well worth a new module price imo

Can you send me the tack file? Mission 10: I managed to complete it successfully. Today was a bit different than the first attempt at the mission. When the Volk-2 taxied very close to my tail after stopping on the taxiway, it stopped, waited a moment, and then took off vertically. It continued its mission independently for the rest of the mission. It immediately flew from the airport into the mountains. The Oriol-1 froze in a hover again. This time, I didn't have the colored (yellow) message about the troops being loaded, nor the information to select the cargo. After landing and selecting the report, there was no document animation, but the typewriter sound was there. Despite these minor glitches, the mission ran smoothly. I enjoyed it.

I'm aware of using a ksb export but that's to much work in my opinion.

Hi Team, Do we have an update or any sort of indication to the progress of this issue? We're coming up to the 1 year anniversary and still without a fix (smh) @JG54_NF2 @uboats @BIGNEWY

Real men fly TACAN approaches

Let's consider some light attack aircraft and see how they fit light attack aircraft role, say, counter-insurgency mission. I want to understand, in which scenario which aircraft can be used in DCS. MB-339 Pros Fast Can do high G Wide nomenclature of air-to-surface armament Rich nav equipment Cons No radar altimeter, which is bad for low level mission No air-to-air rockets, but who needs it anyway in counter-insurgency scenario? But who knows... No flares Bad support in DCS, almost six month now without updates C-101 Pros Excellent nav equipment Has radar altimeter, which is helpful in low-level missions Good air-to-surface nomenclature, MB-339 is better though (?) Has aim-9 for self-defense, but who needs it in counter-insurgency scenarios? Well... Good support in DCS, regular updates Cons Not so fast comparing to mb-339 Not so high in G, but not critical, as it's slower No flares L-39ZA Pros? Help me here Cons Not really fast Worse nav No countermeasures But L-39 has known real combat employment in multiple conflicts

Any updates you can share with us? Please do solicit public feedback on your idea before actually implementing it.

Abandonware.

Yeah, forgot to rename the folder and only named zip correctly. It's the correct version.

We are talking about the same antivirus service that flags P2P clients as dangerous threats.. they clearly overstep their software BTW does CWS 3.71 fix anything performance related?

After trying out MSFS 2020 and 2024, I must agree. Flight in DCS is dead from this perspective.

Really? No valid link to the official paintkit? Would be really awesome if the file would be made available again.

Well after giving up for some time, I can now report that the issue still kind of exists although it got better again. The symptom however still remains: On some servers (e.g. "[PL] Gildia.org - Dynamic Range Germany (Cold War) PvE", my machine is stuck at "Net sim post start" for around 3 minutes. I can join any other servers (also with the Germany CW map) but none takes that long. The issue just appeared since the last patch, before I never even had observed that message during the loading process. My machine is a i7-10700K with 64 GB Memory and a 5090.

Hi All, After a steer if possible. I have created an airfield - so dispersal and runway etc. I have added in both collision shell and collision lines and these are now 'solid' in that I can land on them. Not sure which does what so added both modifiers - but it works. I then created and added 2 small hangars, as separate standalone models and cut/pasted them into the overall scene. I did the same (collision shell/line) and these are now solid - in that if I taxi into them I hit a solid object. When I created them (in Blender) I solidified and applied the modifier to the model. I have now created 2 further hangars, added exactly the same collision shell/lines - yet can easily fly through them? The hangars have a solidify modifier (to make the walls solid - exactly as per my initial buildings - but it wasn't applied) - but if I apply it (thinking that to be the problem) - I then get errors during export (which it doesn't). Not sure what I am doing wrong at this point - and is driving me crazy - having tried all different combinations...

Hi! The link on Mega allows you to download version 2.5. Perhaps it's 2.7?

Mission is impassible at 100 completion rate. A few I've come across which are worth noting, listed below: No.2 (wingman) disappears from the F10 map, but somehow is still showing on SA page, post the attack on bridges at WP1. Despite giving No.2 the "push" to attack waypoints 4 and 5 in their respective order and sequence, he drops altitude, does his own thing and drops 2x bombs on Bomb Factory and propaganda center simultaneously. No.2's voice updates only become audible when attacking/confirming. However, post bridge attack (WP1), I never get a pickle nor shack calls from him until attacking WP6 (propaganda canter). Even with all targets supposedly destroyed, and after receiving AMC's message to RTB, the mission end is not triggered, neither after objective completion, nor upon landing back at Incirlik. Attaching Tacview file for reference. Tacview-20250804-221453-DCS.zip.acmi

Yes please, i jumped in and pre-ordered this, hopefully the module continues and there is enough support to do an AC-130 variant as well

Hey there. The F-4E includes the DSCG variant and the DMAS variant (which is to follow still). Generally HB plans to work on a Naval F4 in the future as well. Its not more than a thought at the current stage though, which version is also undecided. Details in the FAQ, cheers.

The best place would be a wishlist item with publicly available evidence of what you are looking for.

Thanks for your Feedback! OK thats very interessting. Do you think this procedure was different in different countrys? Which unit you are refers to? Polish aviation right? Thats even more special because both were Warschau Pact countrys. Do you think its possible? In the east german army it was leaved in MK according to the source above.

Let us know!

Did you try to change the trim speed in the special settings?

Been asked repeatedly. By myself and others. They are probably using editing tricks. I can do the same myself. However the methods I've found. Makes the vidoes very dark. So actually using it on dark vidoes doesn't work very well. I need to fly on full moon nights with no clouds to get it light enough to see anything with my night vision video effects

hello. make sure you have the correct time and date on your computer. pick a good source from the Internet and let it sync. try that and come back if you are still having issues. old post but essentially the same.