All Activity

if you get 57" MP at sea level, there is no reason to assume that water injection is not implemented. WEP is MIL + water injection. And that should give you pretty much 57“ MP (57.5” to be exact).

By the way, it's is mentioned in patchnotes that the ability to pass args and return values from mission scripting “a_do_script()” and “a_do_file()” was added. Can we have some basic example how to do that? Is it 2nd, 3rd args of the functiosn or? Not obvious

Hi in TV Wide it actually shows FLIR. Check out "Sensor Management" section of the AAQ-33 chapter in the manual. It explains how the different FOVs of each sensor are displayed. thank you

As others have said, the lack of respect for the community is what's most disappointing. A timely warning would have been a great solution. We create missions, others offer their expertise to create scripts so our missions can improve, others offer their computers or servers to host the missions, mostly for free. I've been doing this since 2013 with FC2. I offer my servers, and with every release, we've always had to work on the server to ensure there are no errors and then patch things up so everything can work properly. We put our energy and time into the community, and no one pays us. I imagine you know this, or not? My servers are closed now because my missions aren't working! You sell the product, we create the quests, thanks also to the help of people like Grim, Speed, Ciribob Cfrag, etc... who create and have created scripts to help quest administrators improve their servers and mission. Slmod doesn't work either.

I have a few things that I don't use anymore for sale. Nothing absolutely has to go, but as I don't use it and it's just gathering dust, we should be able to come to a reasonable price. I'm based in the Netherlands. Shipping costs is yours to cover. If you're interested in anything, your best bet is to contact me through discord on #hankismymiddlename. Asking prices are about 70% of the new price. 1x WINWING ViperAce Metal Throttle Grip (you'll need the base) (new price €234.29) 1x WINWING Orion2 ViperAce(EX)Joystick Combo (new price €276.76) 1x MONSTERTECH Desk mount (new price €141.34) 1x WINWING ICP (new price €193.75) 1x MONSTERTECH Desk mount for WINWING MIP (new price €212.51) 1x VIRPIL Z-Extension (new price €72.54)

Best I can suggest for the time being is to go into the mission editor and delete the mods that are no longer working in game. I flew the last two video over the past 2 days and have not run into any issues. I know that's not what you want to hear, but I am having trouble replicating the issue. Also, with ED's new patch this week, we were waiting to see how it affected ITJ I noticed last night the Huey's were dropping out of the sky again. Unfortunately, this is part of the problem building a mission centric around a ton of mods. I have been tempted to scale it back to just the VAP pack, Cayuse, and Bronco. When ViolentNomad releases his Cobra and we push this out again, I will probably remove the static boats you do not see very often and the ones not being used.

I have a sneaking suspicion that this is why RB pushed the Strike Eagle out... they knew they were gonna get busted, tried to get it out and get what they could from it... take the money and take off... only... the contract stopped that from happening. That said... It could be just that even if they agreed to the new policy... Ron might just be enough of a petulant child that he's basically refusing to give it up. It should be an open and shut court case. "You agreed to the new terms, now deliver"... but unless ED hires someone to fast-rope into the dudes house and retrieve that flash drive (and, well, any computer it might be on)... there's few ways for them to get the source code. The only other option would be to put all of the modules in front of teams to basically reverse engineer them, rebuild the code from scratch, and PRAY it works in 3.#

This is very real world modern poltics. But many countries have these kinda places, without being classed as 3rd world. Including the USA, as a mobile doctor who travel to many places in the US to give free medical treatment to poor neighbourhoods. And he states that these places would absolutely be classed as 3rd world if they weren't part of the US. I think you'll find many places in many countries that could be classed as 3rd world even if the country isn't. I think all countries outside of western Europe, Japan, and an New Zealand will have some places like these. There are obviously too much spending on military in many countries. And sadly this is now also happening in countries that used not spend so much on it.

+1 for the external lights inoperability. The approach light is the most important given it's so beautiful the cockpit with the UV lights, while can't see the surrounding while taxiing.

That gremlin is back!

I get 57" and about 302 kts at sea level at the weight of 12088 lbs. As far as I can tell, there's no water injection implemented yet.

Honestly, thank you. Im still frustrated over this whole thing, better than nothing I guess.

I really dont know what you're on about other than one side is talking while the other side is keeping quiet...its the age old gate keeper question: one of us tells the truth all the time, the other lies about everything. In order to find the correct door, you need to ask the right questions, and only one of them are going to tell you the truth because one of them has an official statement and sticking to it and not telling the full truth, while the other side hasnt really shown very much integrity in regards to both their customers and their employer. Just know that deep down that you should expect Razbam not to make a come-back to DCS; if they do, they do. If not, you wont be let down.

1. Noted 2. Not a bug. 3. Noted 4. Noted 5. DCS limitation, currently has open ticket on ED's tracker. 6. Please provide a track.

Thanks, I will give that a go today.

Its easy to figure out; those modules in development prior to 2017 are in jeopardy; UH1H, F5E, Mi-8, F-86, Mig15, Mig-21...probably only 2 or 3 of them are at risk, and even then not likely since the vast majority of them are Belsimtek and ED. OctopusG and Mag3...but thats only 2 aircraft that are under an early contract.

The fact that you can literally go and ask one side any question you want and get a detailed response that is both straight to the point and coherent with the full picture they provide. On the other side you got pretty much nothing and constant signs of both vagueness and avoidance. Yet somehow I'm meant to believe that the first side is actively engaging in an anti consumer behaviour just because "you wouldn't get it and there's a hidden contractual thing that makes them unprofessional" that apparently only applies to one side that can't even get their statements together. I'm really starting to wonder if it's just a smoke and mirrors tactic especially when we're talking about companies that not that not so long ago used to made deals through a WhatsApp chat. How am I as a consumer that is going to lose their EA dream aircraft ment to somehow believe that every single thing which was laid out by RBs side, containing of some of the best in scene talent that has been left out to dry and financially and mentally pushed out of the scene, giving me in depth info about the entire BTS process and how it's now completely over, is a total lie without any proof claiming otherwise but some flash words.

Nope, they did not promised us anything. It's just your wishful thinking. They just said that from now on, the future contracts would require the game files available to ED. Apparently RB contracts were not "future". So maybe, just maybe, this situation will not happen to some of the other modules. But I agree, it would be nice to know which ones

This I know. You can see in the video that in such situations, after dynamic placeholder hot alignment is completed and the INS is also aligned, the HUD still shows deviation during takeoff.

How can i make the HUD and the HMD look like this again (two colors of green)? I actually really liked the color difference. And for example make the text in the MFD's Yellow like the picture above from Archangel44 for all screens (normal windows, PODS and Weapons)?

Hi BN! Thanks for the quick reply, indeed my weapon was Marvrick in vis mode and i didn't checked. this sloved the major issue i have encountered. Thank you Alternatively, i might have managed to break the AA FCR in this situation. I have updated the track file for this occation. Otherwise this is solved. Many thanks! Yes you are right, identical issue

dude...just open a support ticket and ask for one. Youll get store credit instead of a refund, but its 100% better than nothing.

That doesn't strike me as the kind of problem a re-install would have anything to do with, I would look elsewhere first. Going from memory, assuming your canopy is open, I switch to ICS, then it's option 8, option 2, option 1, I believe, from the Comms menu (8,5,1 for Ground Air Supply).

У меня точно такая же хрень... не могу понять в чём проблема... нужно попробывать отключить...

It's either the C-130 Mod or the Armed black hawk: Explanation: The reason the C-130 causes DCS to have a stroke when CJS Module is installed, is because the ordinance table is built using the new database names ie ("Weapons.Missile.AIM_120C") etc etc. and when the C-130 Mod tries to build it's ammo crates using a wstype that's a mixed string (integer and table name), DCS has already processed the CJS Ordinance table and shifted the database to the Type.SubType.Unit format, and therefore the wstype string containing both integers and table name is no longer valid, plus the weapon is already defined, as the CJS Mod Tells DCS to Process the Aircraft Weapons Pack first. For the C-130 Mod, the Problem line in the loadout lua file is 180 Ammo_Pallet_Contents({user_name = _("Ammo GBU-31V3B*6 [12949lb]"), clsid = "Herc_Ammo_GBU_31_V3B_bombs", contents = "{GBU-31V3B}", count = 6, mass = 981, wstype = {4, 5, 36, GBU_31_V_3B}})--GBU-31V3B The DCS Core function calls for a wsType of either 4 Stage numbers or the new format of 3 stage definitions, This line calls for 3 stage numbers then a table name, which DCS see's the table name as invalid due to a weapon already being declared using weapons.bombs.TABLE_NAME. So the Fix is to update the weapon wstype in the pallet's wstype, you can update it to use the new weapon wsType format: Ammo_Pallet_Contents({user_name = _("Ammo GBU-31V3B*6 [12949lb]"), clsid = "Herc_Ammo_GBU_31_V3B_bombs", contents = "{GBU-31V3B}", count = 6, mass = 981, wstype = "weapons.bombs.GBU_31_V_3B"})--GBU-31V3B