All Activity

Yes. That is how aerodynamics works. That is the core basics of how generating lift works. Increase speed to increase lift, and decrease speed to decrease lift. That is why losing engine power makes the plane/jet slow which then makes it fall out of the sky.

We were seeing this for a while, but not currently.

Because they were waiting for the record , 9.08.2025 Lockheed Martin:

It's impossible to provide a full path that will be correct for everyone .. for example your saved games path includes your username, the DCS folder can be named DCS, DCS World, DCS.openbeta, it can be a custom name like my own DCS.296 (from when I had two DCS versions at the same time). I don't think it is too much to ask from our users to know where their home folder is, and where they installed DCS on the first place. I prefer to refer to them as the DCS Program folder (wherever you put it) and the DCS saved Games folder, and leave to the users to locate them on their own PC.

These issues still remain with shadows off afaik. Not just in the F-5 but in many modules.

Sorry, I'm all in for supporting the developers, but the subscription marketing model is awful .. the moment your income situation changes (retiring, losing our job for a while, a serious disease) you lose access to your software, media entertainment, cloud storage, etc, etc ... I much rather purchase rather than subscribing.

If this has been proposed here several times in the past and nothing has changed, something is wrong. Unfortunately, ED is gradually bringing this situation to its own attention with its approach. When they cannot distribute efforts and resources so that mistakes do not occur over time, they only complicate the situation cumulatively in the future, until it may eventually become unsolvable. I estimate that they must already be focused on newspaper income and they have no time or money left for old mistakes-debts. And on top of that, there are legal - economic issues with RAZBAM. I am also sure that a lot of people will come to explain to us that it is okay.

I'm looking at that picture very closely but I'm not seeing any RCAF markings.

На форуме стали появляться "безобидные" запросы об подробностях симуляции и работы в целом блоков из версии 9-12 совместимых с 9-13. Поток их резко пошёл вверх после ажиотажа вокруг модуля МиГ-29А он же проект 9-12. Совместимость 9-12 и 9-13 настолько сильная что небольшие утечки чреваты. В своё время по спутниковым фотографиям по следу работы двигателя, отпечатку на бетонке с места стоянки на 90% точно определяли состав топлива ушедших в полёт ЛА со стоянки. Так что безобидность тут сами понимаете не такая уж и безобидная. Вот и вся "теория заговора". Шапочки из фольги конечно тут не помогут... но если сильно захотеть.

I've been flying the Viggen for a while now and working my way through all the weapons. When trying to use the Sidewinder derived A2A missiles the seeker heads do not behave as expected, compared to the F-4E which worked flawlessly in the same mission file. The only heat source that I can get a proper tone lock from is (directly bore sighted towards) the sun. No adversary aircraft I tried will give a tone. The Missile Uncage button will not lock on a target either. The missiles sometimes track to the target from an exact bore sight. I'm flying a fully patched version 2.9.18.12899 MT. I suspect that this is a bug. I looked and could not find any way that the Viggen is misconfigured on my part.

For DCS Germany map: (not Cold war ;)) Nice USAF skin C-130J-30:

I'm afraid you'll have to rephrase that question. The TDC is the cursor you get in the HUD with the HUD as SOI. It doesn't have anything to do with the HMCS though. You say TrackIR is slaving to something, but you then describe the opposite, which is something being slaved to your TrackIR. What do you mean by "pressing the slew"? The slew control on the throttle has a push or "Z-axis" command, but that doesn't do anything in our A-10C. Do you simply mean "slewing the HDC using the slew control"? It depends on a few factors. Which sensor is your SOI? Did you hook anything in the HMCS? What's your SPI? Generally speaking, when you have set the HMCS as SOI, the slew control will move the HDC around. The HDC is ground stabilized. But the HDC can only be slewed inside the HMCS' field of view. So if you look at a certain point you can slew the HDC around, and if you look away and then look back, the HDC will still be where you left it. But as soon as you tap the slew control, the HDC will reappear inside the HMCS' field of view. So if you have a crappy slew control that maybe sends small inputs all the time, the HDC would appear to follow where you look all the time. This problem could be eliminated with a center deadzone for the 2 slew control axes (or with better hardware ). But maybe I'm misunderstanding the issue you're having, in which case it would help if you could stick to the module's terminology quite precisely. A short track might also help explain the issue a little better.

If you posted this 1 week ago, I could link you the conversation on the Razbam situation thread. Now the old posts are deleted. DM Lineline or BIGNEWY to get the info.

Looks like the textures of damaged glass are already in the game now,maybe just needs some coding to have them set up for the damage model.

A fix to equip rockets on the OH-6 in multiplayer servers with the warehouse system enabled - Download here: OH-6 Rocket Fix I've confirmed this works on Rotorheads, and should work on any multiplayer server (as long as FFAR are instock at the applicable airfield, etc.)

Thank you both, much appreciated! Yes, I had trouble with that too. It can work fine multiple times, then it doesn't. I haven't checked it for a while though, maybe something broke.

Just want to say thanks for this campaign! I'm really enjoying it, it's a great way to learn this plane!

Soon we will fly this beauty in full fidelity, it is really good. I hope there will be more Russian/Soviet jets from 1970 to our days

Hi, Are you willing to sell just the MFD’s? So without the UFC.

It’s good to know I’m not alone. I guess it has to be an issue with AMD, but I would expect more people to be reporting on it if that were the case.

Sorry, I didn't see this. Do you know where I can find this and what popular Redfor aircraft they want to do except for the already planned one? I will not take this as a true thing but as a rumor to stick on it

I’ve seen this wish several times before, but not once have I seen how do they propose to keep the company afloat during that year.

The actual Iowa WW2 version, I was posted on the actual Ship Overview post (actual ships on DCSW), and I sure was posted on other post previously. But, I go to put them all my data otherwise here: Iowa (1982) BB Displacement: 46177 std In Class: [4] Size Class: A/Large In Service: 1982 (1943) - 92 Propulsion: Steam Turbine Crew: 2753 Signature: Large/Loud Armor Rating: 45/19/210 Electrn Cnt: 3rd Gen J&D Acoustic Cnt: 2nd Gen T Weapons: Cbt Sys: Gen 3 Semi-Automatic 2F/A(3)3 Mk7 406mm/50//2 Mk13 C P/S(2)6 Mk28 5in/38//4 Mk25 (5.0) C PW/SW/PA/SA(R)4 Mk15 Phalanx Blk 0 (4@6.3A) C PS/SS(4)4 Mk141 w/4 Harpoon D PB&SB(4)8 Mk143 ABL w/4 Tomahawk D Sensors: ES: 3rd Gen SPS-67(V)1, SPS-49(V)5, SPS-59/LN-66 J Link 11 L Remarks: Iowa, New Jersey, Missouri, Wisconsin. Configuration as of 1981 - 88 modernization. Recommissioned: IA Apr 84, NJ Dec 82, MO May 86, WI Oct 88. Typical Tomahawk loadout 16 TASM, 8 TLAM-C, 8 TLAMN. Aft helo pad with space for three Small helicopters. Aft 406mm turret cannot fire while helicopters are on the pad. NJ has SPS-10 vice SPS-67. WI has SPS-64 vice LN-66, Phalanx Blk I vice Blk 0, AA rating 4@6.6A. Dec 86: Iowa fitted with Pioneer UAV for gunfire spotting, others fitted later. 1988: WI fitted with Mk15 Phalanx Blk I (4@9.5A). Apr 89: Gun explosion on Iowa, 47 killed. No.2 (forward) turret unserviceable and never repaired. 1991: MO and WI fitted with P/S(1)2 Bushmaster Mk88 25mm and Stinger missiles for service in Middle East Decommed: IA 1990, NJ, WI 1991, MO 1992. Damage & Speed Breakdown: Dam Pts: 0 275 549 824 988 1098 Surf Speed: 33 25 16 8 0 Sinks Iowa (1967) BB Displacement: 46177 std In class: [1] Size Class: A/Large In Service: 1967 (1943) - 69 Propulsion: Steam Turbine Crew: 1626 Electrn Cnt: 1st Gen J&D Acoustic Cnt: None Signature: Large/Loud Armor Rating: 45/19/210 Weapons: Cbt Sys: Gen 2 Manual 2F/A(3)3 Mk7 406mm/50//2 Mk13 C 2PW/2SW/P/S/2P&PQ/2S&SQ(2)10 Mk28 5in/38//F/P/S/A 4 Mk25 (8.4) C Aft Pad (1)4 helo B Sensors: ES: 1st Gen SPS-6, SPS-10 J Remarks: New Jersey. Recommissioned for Vietnam War. Aft 406mm turret cannot fire while helicopters are on the pad. Apr 68: Deployment. One 406mm turret and half of the 5 inch guns not manned. Uses QH-50DM UAV for NGS spotting. Dec 69: Decommed. Damage & Speed Breakdown: Dam Pts: 0 275 549 824 988 1098 Surf Speed: 33 25 16 8 0 Sinks Iowa (1950) BB Displacement: 46177 std In class: [3] Size Class: A/Large In Service: 1950 (1943) - 58 Propulsion: Steam Turbine Crew: 1626 Signature: Large/Loud Armor Rating: 45/19/210 Weapons: Cbt Sys: Gen 2 Manual 2F/A(3)3 Mk7 406mm/50//2 Mk13 C 2PW/2SW/P/S/2P&PQ/2S&SQ(2)10 Mk28 5in/38//F/P/S/A 4 Mk25 (8.4) C P/S(4)20 Mk2 40mm/60 (5.0L) - IA, MO C P/S(4)16 Mk2 40mm/60 (4.0L) - WI C Aft Pad (1)4 HUP-2 Retriever B Sensors: ES: 1st Gen SPS-6, SPS-8, SPS-10 J Remarks: Iowa, New Jersey, Wisconsin. Recommissioned for Korean War: IA Aug 51, NJ Nov 50, WI Mar 51. Aft 406mm turret cannot fire while helicopters are on the pad. 1956: Iowa, New Jersey and Wisconsin fitted to carry 10 Mk23 406mm nuclear shells with nuclear warheads each for B mount only. 1962: Mk23 nuclear shells removed. Damage & Speed Breakdown: Dam Pts: 0 275 549 824 988 1098 Surf Speed: 33 25 16 8 0 Sinks And the "other" exotics versions, planned, but never builded. Iowa Guided Missile Battleship BBG Displacement: 44000 std In Class: 1 Size Class: A/Large In Service: 1956 Propulsion: Steam Turbine Crew: 2753 Signature: Large/Loud Armor Rating: 45/19/195 Weapons: Cbt Sys: Gen 2 Manual F(3)2 Mk7 16in/50//2 Mk13 C A(2)2 Mk10 w/80 Terrier//2 SPG-55 D A(1)1 launcher w/8 Regulus II D P/S(2)10 Mk28 5in/38//4 Mk12 (5.6) C PW/SW/4P/4S/PA/SA(2)12 Mk33 3in/50 (3.0) C Sensors: SPS-6B, SPS-8 J Remarks: SCB 19. Kentucky. Proposal to convert unfinished hull as BBG. Authorized in 1954, canceled later that year. Displacement estimated. Damage & Speed Breakdown: Dam Pts: 0 266 532 797 957 1063 Surf Speed: 33 25 16 8 0 Sinks Iowa Ballistic Missile Monitor (Sep 58) BBMG Displacement: 40000 std In Class: 4 Size Class: A/Large In Service: 1963 Propulsion: Steam Turbine Crew: 2130 Signature: Large/Loud Armor Rating: 45/19/195 Weapons: Cbt Sys: Gen 3 Semi-Automatic F(3)2 Mk7 16in/50//2 Mk13 C P/S(2)2 Mk28 5in/38//1 Mk56 GFCS (1.7) C A(2)1 Mk12 w/56 Talos//2 SPG-49 D P/S(1)4 Mk12 w/42 Tartar//SPG-51 D A(1)1 launcher w/4 Regulus II D P&S(1)8 Mk16 ASROC launcher w/8 ASROC E PB/SB(3)2 Mk32 324mm TT w/Mk44 F 2 ASW helicopters B Sensors: SPS-10, SPS-37, SPS-30, SPS-39 J SQS-26 K Remarks: Listed configuration is Scheme I. Scheme II would replace both forward 16 inch turrets with F(2)1 Talos launcher//2 SPG-49. Launch tubes for 6 Polaris missiles added early in 1959. Program canceled in 1959. Fitted with NTDS, Flag plot and command spaces for amphibious command staff. Displacement estimated. Damage & Speed Breakdown: Dam Pts: 0 250 499 749 898 998 Surf Speed: 33 25 16 8 0 Sinks Iowa Ballistic Missile Monitor II (1956) BBMG Displacement: 40000 std In Class: 4 Size Class: A/Large In Service: 1961 Propulsion: Steam Turbine Crew: 2753 Signature: Large/Loud Armor Rating: 45/19/195 Weapons: Cbt Sys: Gen 2 Manual F/A(2)2 Mk12 Talos w/80 msls//4 SPG-49 D P/S(2)4 Mk11 w/42 Tartar//2 SPG-55 D (12)1 launcher w/12 Jupiter D Sensors: SPS-2, SPS-10, SPS-32, SPS-33, SPS-37 J Remarks: Preliminary design work only. Fitted with three sets of fin stabilizers. Scheme I was fitted with 4 twin Talos launchers and 12 single Tartar launchers (!), but was impractical because of mutual interference from the 28 missile guidance radars. Displacement estimated. Damage & Speed Breakdown: Dam Pts: 0 250 499 749 898 998 Surf Speed: 27 20 14 7 0 Sinks Iowa Commando/Heavy Assault Ship BBHA? Displacement: 44000 std In Class: 4 Size Class: A/Large In Service: 1964 Propulsion: Steam Turbine Crew: 2753 Signature: Large/Loud Armor Rtng: 45/19/195 Weapons: Cbt Sys: Gen 1 Manual F(3)2 Mk7 16in/50//2 Mk13 C P/S(2)2 Mk28 5in/38 /1 Mk56 GFCS (1.1) C 32 HUS helicopters (20 in hangar, 12 on flight deck) B F(8)1 ASROC launcher w/8 msls E Centerline elevator -- 14 LCM(6) or 6 LCM(6) and 6 LCM(8) -- Sensors: SPS-10, SPS-37, SPS-30, SPS-39 J SQS-23 K Remarks: 1961 proposal. Flight deck aft, spots for 3 medium-sized helicopters. Flag plot. Carried extra fuel for replenishing amphibious task force. One 16-inch gun converted to fire Mk23 nuclear rounds. Carried 1800 troops. Initially typed as “Commando Ship” but then redesignated “Heavy Assault Ship.” Displacement estimated. Damage & Speed Breakdown: Dam Pts: 0 266 532 797 957 1063 Surf Speed: 33 25 16 8 0 Sinks