AG-51_Razor

Great ideas! Thanks

I'm a little nervous about how I am going to manage a twin engine prop plane with just a two throttle HOTAS. Has anyone figured this one out yet? Currently I use one throttle for throttle and one for RPM and a slider for fuel mixture. What are you all thinking of for a twin, such as the Mossie or a P-38 or A-20 or JU-88 or, or, or?????

OH BABY!! C'mon funny feeling!! Thanks man

Hey Donny, could you help a brother out? I mean, it's been almost a month and I'm really starting to get the shakes. Night sweats and stomach cramps are really getting to me! I need a fix man! Just a little touch to get me through the holidays would do it. Can you help me out????

Sorry Spanky, I should have said, "The only reason the string is flapping sideways while in flight is because you're way out of trim, not because there is a crosswind. Merry Christmas to you as well.

The only reason the string is flapping sideways is because you're way out of trim, not because there is a crosswind.

Maybe I misunderstood you Uxi, but the ED F-14A does do exactly what Jagohu is asking for. As a matter of fact - I think - The HB F-14B used to this when it first came out, that is, its wings would fold back as soon as you linked it to the carrier when placing it on the deck as a static object. It would be nice if "they" could get it back to doing that again. :thumbup:

What Jester 986 said:thumbup: I would definitely support any full fidelity module you guys ever decide to produce. Thanks for the interview and many thanks for this T-45!!

Thanks Wombat :thumbup:

I have a question about the refueling pod; Does the tanker determine the amount of fuel delivered or does the receiver set that? It would be nice to be able to somehow specify the max amount of fuel to be delivered during a mission.

Definitely a worthwhile wish. It would be awesome to see ED and/or some 3rd Party developer really get serious about the PTO during WWII. I have no doubt that it will eventually happen, my only concern - being 69 yrs old - is whether I will live long enough to see it. :pilotfly:

Is there any reason why it couldn't be filmed landing on a carrier, or launching from one? Is that going to be possible? Is the refueling probe there just for looks? .... and I don't mean that in a snide manner. I am wondering if the Buc will have the same restrictions as the A-4E ie. no radio ergo no ability to tank. Beautiful model though. I've always loved the RN carrier a/c! :thumbup:

Awesome work Donny!! :thumbup:

Beautiful!! :thumbup:

The REAL trick will be to see them develop a truly amphibious plane such as the PBY Catalina or the Grumman J-2F Duck or the Supermarine Walrus!

Actually, 2 wishes; 1) Would it not be possible to have a few more Tanker Callsigns? 2) This one is a little more frivolous I suppose. Can you have the tanker recognize which player is requesting the rejoin? Mother gets that courtesy, I should think that the tanker deserves the same respect. :smilewink:

This is one of the few modules that, despite the lack of a launch bar, tail hook or folding wings, will be a first day buy for me! Looking forward to throwing my money at you RAZBAM!!

Awesome update HB!! Thank you for your continued dedication to this module! I am an extremely satisfied customer!

Thank you ED!! :thumbup::thumbup:

You are absolutely right Grimes, it works like a charm! Thank you very much for this mod!! I just assumed, after reading the thread, that it was broken back in August and had not been fixed. Anyway, it installed just exactly as advertised and works just as you said it would. Thanks again! :thumbup:

Is there a way to modify the .miz file in order to add just one country to a coalition?

This is such a useful MOD! Why is it so difficult for ED to incorporate it into the ME? It would seem to be in their best interest as they move forward with more and mor content that can be added to previously constructed missions and campaigns. :helpsmilie:

It's not just you!! :thumbup:

Not a fan of this new format. :(

Definitely not a fan of this new format but, like some others in here have mentioned, it was most likely done out of necessity and not just so some FNG at ED could put their finger print on it and claim that they are doing something! It is what it is.:(