Cab
-
Posts
1242 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Cab
-
A couple of employees have but that doesn't represent the position of the company. Also, who knows, things may work themselves out and they might change their minds. We just don't know yet. Sorry, but I don't think you really don't have a justification for a refund yet. Regardless of what has been written, at this time the module is still working as intended.
-
I don’t think there is any real world documentation for that. But it does seem to be the way the jet behaves in DCS.
-
"Ever since..." That's the key
-
This is the most interesting post I've seen in a long time. You've formed a rock-solid conclusion based on comments some people have made on different forums over just a couple of days. Meanwhile, you call others "flat-earthers" who are reminding us we don't have any real facts and advising people to wait for more official before jumping to conclusions.
- 111 replies
-
- 13
-
-
Yes, I know about the EULA. I still believe ED would give refunds (or store credit) under the conditions I stated. But let's hope we don't need to find out.
-
Worst case scenario, anyone buying a Razbam module after the dispute came to light yesterday has a very good justification for a refund.
-
Thanks
-
It would be useful for the discussion to hear what you think the OP gets wrong.
-
I believe the plan is to introduce the PG map with the F-4
-
Personally, I liked it and wish they left it on.
-
I'll go out on a limb and assume that's weather turbulence, not wake turbulence. According to the server information, wake turbulence is off for the server. (See picture) However, now that I'm thinking about it, I fly on that server often and distinctly remember feeling wake turbulence several times recently. Copy
-
But should he be experiencing wake turbulence if it's turned off for that server?
-
Just simulate being a carrier-based pilot on exchange duty with a land-based air force. That’s super realistic.
-
Which stick did you get? I'm toying with the idea myself.
-
Yeah, it's number one on my wish list. They said some time ago they were placing it on the backburner for other priorities.
-
Maybe more of an induced coma. But I’m concerned the patient could still die.
-
F-4E Phantom II Development Update and Release Delay Announcement
Cab replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
It’s been that way for at least a week now, I think. And don’t forget the rainbow! As in, “the pot gold at the end of…” -
More accurately, it was originally designed for fleet air defense for the U.S. Navy.
-
This is a waste of time. I’m out
-
That is quite literally not what’s happening here. A closer comparison might be a sign advertising the building your favorite restaurant right down the street but it never opens.
-
My thoughts exactly. Except to be precise, I believe Aggressor F-5’s were also based in England and the Philippines.
-
Yes, they certainly could be. My guess is the USAF made the decision PAR’s were sufficient for the F-5 and saved money not installing ILS.
-
For the record, IRL PAR approaches can get a plane not equipped with ILS or GPS down to 200 feet.
-
This may be the fundamental misunderstanding. At this time they don’t have a product to sell, and they aren’t pretending otherwise.