Cab
-
Posts
1279 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Cab
-
Worst case scenario, anyone buying a Razbam module after the dispute came to light yesterday has a very good justification for a refund.
-
Thanks
-
It would be useful for the discussion to hear what you think the OP gets wrong.
-
I believe the plan is to introduce the PG map with the F-4
-
Personally, I liked it and wish they left it on.
-
I'll go out on a limb and assume that's weather turbulence, not wake turbulence. According to the server information, wake turbulence is off for the server. (See picture) However, now that I'm thinking about it, I fly on that server often and distinctly remember feeling wake turbulence several times recently. Copy
-
But should he be experiencing wake turbulence if it's turned off for that server?
-
Just simulate being a carrier-based pilot on exchange duty with a land-based air force. That’s super realistic.
-
Which stick did you get? I'm toying with the idea myself.
-
Yeah, it's number one on my wish list. They said some time ago they were placing it on the backburner for other priorities.
-
Maybe more of an induced coma. But I’m concerned the patient could still die.
-
F-4E Phantom II Development Update and Release Delay Announcement
Cab replied to IronMike's topic in DCS: F-4E Phantom
It’s been that way for at least a week now, I think. And don’t forget the rainbow! As in, “the pot gold at the end of…” -
More accurately, it was originally designed for fleet air defense for the U.S. Navy.
-
This is a waste of time. I’m out
-
That is quite literally not what’s happening here. A closer comparison might be a sign advertising the building your favorite restaurant right down the street but it never opens.
-
My thoughts exactly. Except to be precise, I believe Aggressor F-5’s were also based in England and the Philippines.
-
Yes, they certainly could be. My guess is the USAF made the decision PAR’s were sufficient for the F-5 and saved money not installing ILS.
-
For the record, IRL PAR approaches can get a plane not equipped with ILS or GPS down to 200 feet.
-
This may be the fundamental misunderstanding. At this time they don’t have a product to sell, and they aren’t pretending otherwise.
-
Sure, I think everyone would agree more frequent updates would be good. If handled correctly it is probably a net positive. The problem, as is see it, is people feeling like devs have an obligation to do so when they’ve accepted no money.
-
I don't remember what interview it was, but I do remember hearing someone I thought reputable say that about Swiss Hornets. I don't recall that about the Finnish ones. But they also said the Swiss Hornets had structural enhancements that allowed it. Other than that, I don't remember seeing a definitive reference.
-
Who, exactly, is jerking you around. They've taken no money; they've made no promises. You and others need to rethink this.
-
Maybe. But that fact is none of us know
-
Unless the Swiss (and maybe the Finns?) made them for themselves, I doubt there are any. But I agree they would be very interesting to look at if they did exist.
