viper2097

Poste bitte einen Track.

Nope. Funktioniert alles wie es soll.

Kommst du denn eventuell am DLC wheel an und fährst aus Versehen die Maneuverflaps aus? Drück das nächste mal doch DLC fwd und schau ob sie einfahren.

No, there is nothing wrong about that. But the repeating "I can't read the labels" discussion / justification is annoying. All labels are readable. Most good and without problems. Not readable ones are WIP or still missing. Also the cat does not have sooo many knobs and you should know where they are and what they are doing without any labels at all. People who are complaining had mostly not even 10h in the cockpit. I think HB did an awesome.job on the cockpit and the immersion great. I don't know it, but Incould believe that the wear is not thar far off as someones woild like to have it.

I brought the same issue up at the Tomcat subforum. It seems, that Devs could manage to get that working correct, but it would lead to a lot of other problems. The root is in DCS itself. However, the Tomcat feels a bit better now, no idea if or what they have changed so far. But you are right, it feels that too much thrust is needed for taxing (and keep taxing) the Harrier.

They have not been implemented. No idea if they work on the real aircraft and if / when Razbam will implement them. Also contrast and gain is not working. No idea what SYM should do.

You may have to take the difference between real life and a flat screen, or even worse, VR into account. Take a buisness card. Lay it between your legs on the chair you are sitting right now. I'm pretty sure youc an read everything without any problem. Just with a glimpse. Now look at the Tacan in the F-14. The position is probably as far away from your eyes as the buisness card. However, in DCS everyone (flat screen and VR users) have problems to read that. While I gues it was never a problem in real life. Same for the labels on all the knobs and switches. Beside some missing textures and WIP's, I'm pretty sure that if you would sit in the real, scanned cockpit, you may have no problems to read any labels. I'm perfectly fine with the readability (and I use VR) and be very happy with the cockpit. However, it would still be great if a responsible person (from that timeframe) who "owned" a cat would like to say somethign about it.

None, as it was the fault of the RIO. Did the Pilot survived? Must be pretty bad... You trap and then get shot out through the canopy and have no idea whats going on... Imagine this would happen in THAT SECOND you are sitting in front of the computer now... Pretty bad...

You may technicaly correct ;). Needed to think about that a few seconds... But I'd guess that the GPS from the Hornet would be as accurate as the JDAM GPS.

Habe gerade erst einige Mk82 in Computer-Pilot Ohne Peobleme abgeworfen. Haben aich getroffen.

Muscle car und Minivan...

I know, just wanted to be puristic ;).

So you would be satisfied with that? :pilotfly: Would be pretty intresting to fight against Mig21 in a realistic scenario...

Yep

I would guess you are on the stable and not on the open beta...

Typische Schilderung der Alltagsprobleme eines Hornet Piloten. Da können die Turkeydriver nur schmunzeln xD.

Tomcat release has been nearly a half year ago. Its an outstanding module which is outstanding done by you guys. Congratulations. Although it has a quite high completion grade, a lot of functions are still missing. Since release of the early access version, there was mainly done bug fixing. Also there was none progress on the Viggen. According to the first posting in this thread, personal I'm looking forward and can hardly await nearly every single one of that missing features. So can you give us some hints of what to expect in the near future? Or what the actual plans are?

Whats blocking your view when looking behind from the correct position? The headrest? That is quite realistic that it is there and you can't view through...

PD and SteamSS do the same. Don't use both of them, just one. I'm running with SteamSS on 150% (make sure that you set that as general, or DCS specific) and PD 1.0. Looks better for me, and performs better then SteamSS 100% and PD 1.5. Pd 1.5 and SteamSS 150% should be the same.

Even if the MLC is turned off, there is still the zero doppler filter. So you won't detect a target that is moving away from you with +/- 100kts. Whtas the "best" is not always a safe answer. it depends a lot on the situation. There is a real cool chart where all radar modes are summed up, however, I won't post it here cause of forum rules. Personaly: When doing CAP, i go for RWS with full bars and degrees. When its getting hot, I go for TWS. PD-STT or P-STT depends on the situation. I only change to pulse if I know that he must be there somewhere, but I can't find him in TWS. Pulse is extreme powerrful and awesome to operate, however, due to no filter its also not easy to operate. Especialy under stress.

Playing VR since ~50 hours. Never had that problem, yesterday evening it occoured for the first time. i forst thought that I hit a wrong btton in DCS, but as it was also there in the Cliff House after I left DCS, it seems clear that It does not have to do anything with DCS.

O+ here and also feels that last two patches have decreased the performance, and also the optics.

Thx, will give that a try. I only opened a Windows in the Cliff House and it was not able to stay there when I went to SteamVR, so I thought it will not work.

You guys realized that the VR movement is limited already? Did you ever tried to get REAL CLOSE to the side consoles? The warning lights on the harrier? The weapon wheel in the Tomcat RIO pit? I would welcome it, if that restriction would be gone, and a canopy restriction would be there. I don't see any "immersive" problems with it. Its glas. I just can't go further. To go through the glass is a more breaking experience.

Tested it today with the Viggen on the NTTR map and everything was fine, so was the NTTR not affected?