MiG-29A Fulcrum Pre-order

[SAM77]

I've been waiting over a decade for this. I really want the S version. Hopefully with enough purchases of MiG29A, ED will develop that as well. Definite buy for me. Now it's time to build a new PC

[II.JG1_Vonrd]

7 hours ago, Rudel_chw said:

Even if an extra 10% discount is enticing, this will be my first time ever refusing a dcs pre-order … I wont purchase until I’m sure that configuration and liveries are not encrypted to prevent user mods, no matter how much I like the aircraft, I was badly burned with the F-5E remaster, so won’t be making the same mistake again.

Aaaannd, this begs the question. Will it be encrypted? @NineLine, @BIGNEWY?

[Beirut]

56 minutes ago, II.JG1_Vonrd said:

Aaaannd, this begs the question. Will it be encrypted? @NineLine, @BIGNEWY?

 

I had the same thought.

 

Hope it doesn't become a thing.

[Rudel_chw]

35 minutes ago, Beirut said:

Hope it doesn't become a thing.

unfortunately I’m not holding my breath on it …  

[Weta43]

Looks amazing - I really don't fly A2A very much anymore, but I might make an exception for this.

 

The little "No planes were harmed in the filming of this video" disclaimer at the end of the trailer cracked me up.

[Mr_Burns]

11 hours ago, JD said:

So I assume that Steam version will be available at release, still no pre order?

Hasnt this been asked and told repeatedly its a Steam issue, they dont do pre-order?

[YoYo]

5 hours ago, II.JG1_Vonrd said:

Aaaannd, this begs the question. Will it be encrypted? @NineLine, @BIGNEWY?

Last time I didnt do any skin for F-5 so the problem is present still? Model viewer 2 wasnt updated yet for encrypted skins?

[Falconeer]

15 hours ago, Esac_mirmidon said:

So it seems no R-27T/ET, and maybe only R-27R, no ER.

FC2024 migs are better equipped for MP servers (where im 85% flying) and you'll get 3 versions of the same plane. Yes, they are simplified, but for me, this module is not worth it. I'll pass this one 

[Esac_mirmidon]

Thats interesting, the MP thing.

As far as i know real MIg-29A doesnt have the T/ET, and only the ER was retrofitted years after entering service. So it could be possible some people will use FC3 Mig-29A on MP instead of the FF, because the expanded misiles options. Or maybe ED will "degraded" FC3 Mig-29A to the same weapon choices of the FF one. XDDD

[Gunfreak]

2 hours ago, Mr_Burns said:

Hasnt this been asked and told repeatedly its a Steam issue, they dont do pre-order?

Steam does pre-order all the time. Sometimes with 1-2 years advance before the release. It's ED/DCS that somehow can't get it to work on steam. They could before. But now they can't.

[Esac_mirmidon]

Steam requires a CERTAIN DATE release for pre-orders. So without a date for Early Access release, no pre-order on Steam.

[BIGNEWY]

14 hours ago, BIGNEWY said:

We would like to have a steam pre-purchase, but steam requires a confirmed date and we dont have that yet. As soon as we know for sure we will let you know about steam. 

thank you

As mentioned previously. 

[Meerschweinmann]

I bought it immediately, no question. Now it's time to count the days. 

[cfrag]

18 hours ago, Graphics said:

At Final Release:

• Ground Control Intercept (GCI) command system. 
• Full IFF modelling.
• Full Flight Manual.
• Campaign by Eagle Dynamics.
• Increased number of missions and liveries.

This is great news, and the plane looks terrific. Since I own each and every module on offer (a >>1K investment) I can't help noticing that a *lot* of the planes that you sold me as Early Access still haven't reached "Final Release" state after 5-6 years (F-16, WW2 Asset Pack). To encourage us often-burned-and-not-learning-the-lesson: do you have a tentative timeline when you envision the Final Release for this plane to occur?  

Thank you so much,

-ch

Edited 4 hours ago by cfrag

[virgo47]

2 minutes ago, cfrag said:

This is great news, and the plane looks terrific. Since I own each and every module on offer (a >>1K investment) I can't help noticing that a *lot* of the planes that you sold me as Early Access still haven't reached "Final Release" state,  

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. I assume this will be higher on their priority list than, say, Yak-52, but how high with all the other top-tier ED modules still in the development, that's the question.

That said, I'm glad there are many people who like and buy the module. For me, it's a pass, at least for now. Maybe I'll add it later, but right now it would just be a hangar queen - and I've got quite a lot of those already.

But the module looks impressive, at least from the video.

[splash]

I was waiting for ages!! I hope the next ones be a Su-25, Su-27, etc. first day buying for all of them.

[SOLIDKREATE]

Picked her up! I shall name her 'Svetlana'

Edited 4 hours ago by SOLIDKREATE

[Hog_driver]

1 hour ago, SOLIDKREATE said:

Picked her up! I shall name her 'Svetlana'

How much playtime with Svetlana can you get for 56 dollars? An hour?

[TOMCATZ]

Hi,

Very important module and for I will buy for sure.

Further I hope for more reds like Flanker or ... No just the Flanker - It was the start of everything in 1995 under the label of SSI - tears of memories ... 

Cheers

TOM

[LuseKofte]

11 hours ago, II.JG1_Vonrd said:

Aaaannd, this begs the question. Will it be encrypted? @NineLine, @BIGNEWY?

I am more interested in why. That Russian crate will be left alone by me anyway. But why do this? 

[Freakmeister51]

2 hours ago, virgo47 said:

Yeah, my thoughts exactly. I assume this will be higher on their priority list than, say, Yak-52, but how high with all the other top-tier ED modules still in the development, that's the question.

That said, I'm glad there are many people who like and buy the module. For me, it's a pass, at least for now. Maybe I'll add it later, but right now it would just be a hangar queen - and I've got quite a lot of those already.

But the module looks impressive, at least from the video.

I’m glad you mentioned the Yak-52 Virgo, I’ve been asking for this module to be made to fly straight for ages, a key bind for the knee board too.

[Major Corvus]

21 hours ago, Raven (Elysian Angel) said:

Obviously this was an instant purchase! Onwards and upwards towards more FF RedFor modules! 

Same for me. I know that it's unlikely, but I'd love a full fidelity Frog

[ThorBrasil]

16 hours ago, Freakmeister51 said:

I won’t be buying anymore DCS modules until some of the more forgotten ones have been given some attention. Eagle Dynamics, you know which ones I am referring to.

 

Yak-52!

13 hours ago, SAM77 said:

I've been waiting over a decade for this. I really want the S version. Hopefully with enough purchases of MiG29A, ED will develop that as well. Definite buy for me. Now it's time to build a new PC

What is the difference between A and S? Thanks!

[Raven (Elysian Angel)]

42 minutes ago, ThorBrasil said:

What is the difference between A and S? Thanks!

“A” doesn’t exist really, other than an obscure pre-production prototype. But it tends to refer to the initial production version (called “Fulcrum-A”) by NATO and in this case it’s a “Project 9.12A” which is the slightly downgraded version for Warsaw-pact.

As such there is no such thing as “MiG-29A”, there is only “MiG-29” with subversions (not using the NATO A-B-C version numbers). The correct name for the one we get in DCS should thus be “MiG-29 9.12A”.

”S” is the first upgrade since that initial production version, or 9.13 with the enlarged dorsal spine for extra internal fuel. These are aircraft produced since 1986. Then there is a 9.13S with further upgrades such as internal ECM, better radar, refinements to flight control, +2 degrees extra max AoA, and provision for 2 external wing tanks. but very few of those exist apparently.

So when people talk about “MiG-29S” they tend to refer to “MiG-29 9.13S” since that’s the one we have in FC3.

Edited just now by Raven (Elysian Angel)
Typo