All Activity

Cheers, brother.

In mission 20 "Helicopters intercept" of the "Heavy Sky" campaign for the Flaming Cliffs Su-33, the mission ends with a result score of 50 even after getting the message indicating mission success. As a result, you have to skip the mission to advance the campaign. You can see it at the end of this guy's video: Looking at it in the mission editor, it looks like maybe the 50 result points we're supposed to get for the "rec" mission goal are not being awarded because that goal has no conditions. When I start the mission and immediately end it, I end up with a result of 0.

Hopefully French, Qatari and Indian French Indian Qatar

Curious to know if any export model modifications may also be included as options? Some of them come with FLIR pods on their chin or refueling probes RAF C-130J IAF C-130J with FLIR pod and refueling probe

I use this for my Warthog throttle. I get Thrustmaster Combined IN ADDITION to the original Warthog Throttle. How can I have the original disabled when the script is running?

So far I've only seen clips and images of the J-30 (Stretch model). Any confirmation that even the normal J model will be included? C-130J C-130J-30

Push-to-talk should be exactly this complicated: 1: Push. 2: Talk. That's it. That's as complicated as it needs to be. As easy as using an old walkie talky where in order to talk you 1) Push and then 2) Talk. But instead in the SRS client "Controls" tab there is no "Push this to talk" button. Instead there 50 different controls, none of them labeled "push to talk" and they assume you know what all of them mean. Can someone tell me what the hell I'm supposed to do? I've tried using this thing in multiplayer and have gotten nowhere. I bound a button to "common PTT" thinking that meant "common button to push-to-talk" but nobody could hear me.

This is my first post so hopefully a admin will move this to a more specific spot. Having issues under “General” in controls. my controller and mouse keybinds do not work in game. the keyboard works fine. i can bind them but they will do nothing when actually trying to using them. i’ve tried uninstalling and it didn’t do anything.

There might be something to this... Just did a quick test limiting the number or "missions" displayed in the menu to 1 per category and it does render the menus correctly... I will do some more testing and analysis tomorrow. Puzzling things is that the standalone client has not issues and the dedicate server does... Perhaps the menu rendering code is not the same. (BTW, my client PC and dedicated server differ only in GPU and total HD size)

Also nvg model on helmut flashes in front of the players eye view when turning your head to look at stuff ...you see 2 big blue lenses flash in front of your face/line of sight. VERY annoying and immersion killing.It does not do this in single player

The issue with the French Pack is that it's not really maintained (one update since 5 years, and I doubt it will see any future updates... No Caesar, Griffon, Jaguar, Mamba, Crotales, etc). A few high-quality Currenthill frigates would be interesting (and why not the Charles de Gaulle!)

With the upcoming F35 and mentions of "bridging the gap" to make things work, I don't see why modules like the L-39 couldn't receive a quality of life update. Adding simple things like Western instruments version with ILS/VORTAC/Modern Radios, Chaff/Flare, NATO Rocket pods/bombs would be huge! Or since the NS430 is already available, make the COM and NAV actually work.

Sorry for the late responses, folks.. @razo+r, I did set the freq for the FAC beforehand and made sure a preset was loaded into the radio before mission start. As for the ATC, I was on the ground at Kutaisi, made sure I was on the correct preset (again, set before mission start) and I tried multiple times to contact ATC for taxi to no success. But If I restarted the mission and tried again, it would work. I couldn't quite get it to do this consistently enough to really go into detail. I tried every possible version of PTT / Radio / communications button available in the controls menu so I'm not sure. @Flappie, Much appreciated. I've been back and forth with the L39 and the A10 so you are probably 100% correct and it may not have the JTAC Item. But I would be really cool if it were added. Again, thanks to both of you for your help!

I mean I think it’s obvious RB isn’t going to do anything unless they get paid. And seeing as ED for some reason doesn’t seem to be willing to pay, even with this last agreement that was signed in 2024, I don’t see anything ever happening. Thus, the agreement getting withdrawn. The reasoning why ED isn't willing to pay is only known to them, they seem pretty tight lipped about it, which is their choice. And it’s not like another third party is gonna buy the source code from RB like people keep hoping for. One, I doubt RB would just sell of their source code. And twoWhy would another third party take the risk to buy it? They’d then be fighting with ED for payments too. No way a third party would sign up for that.

Have you checked for runaway modifiers? You say it only does this in tbe F-14 pilot. Thought about resetting the F-14 pilot controls inputs? Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Ground handling, sharp turns with tailwheel unlocked are not possible without excessive power. Like if the tailwheel would never unclutch even with differential braking. The plane also tends to drift in a very unatural way. Is this something being tweaked ? Thanks Love the Corsair, guys !

OK, double checked and deleted them from missions. I'm getting pretty frustrated as it was working before. Unannounced under the hood changes are pretty annoying, I'm sorry you had problems. Download 2025-08-05 version and all should be well: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3326679/ Thanks Steeljaw!

the current litening in the game has 0 resembelence to the G4. The G4 has a IR Pointer, LTIP, REOs, XR, and SWFOV, Multi Target Tack and many other things we dont have. We definitely do not have the LITENING G4 nor do we have the AT.

Don't say good by so fast please. We all need time for a new map and new mission ideas. Barely flown the map because the map is new and I have only one or two evenings to fly. So I had not the time to look at your mod. In DCS everything is a little bit slower. The people needs several month to investigate new mods which bring new mission ideas. Please give us more time

I can totally understand the frustration when this kind of thing happens, but on my own case the files I share is work that I mostly do for my own enjoyment, so if I eventually share some of it for others to try, and then it seems to not be other's cup of tea, I don't really care as it's for my own enjoyment and so it can't be time wasted. I came onto this thread because I've been porting the Corsair training missions to this Map, so this is the first post that I see about this Mod you did ... don't know why I didn't read about it earlier, did you do a thread about it? For my own files I almost always open a forum thread about it, as it's much easier to get user feedback there than on the User Files section. Hope you can reconsider the sharing of your work, as I'm intrigued and would very much like to try appropiate trains on my future missions for this Map. BTW this is how the ported training is looking like (I did this with the blessing of the missions original author): Eduardo

Every post you made with your trains received positive feedback/reactions. How you take that as "negative zero interest" is unbelievable. Do you just ignore every bit of positive reactions and focus on the negative only or what? But hey, your choice. If you perceive all that bit of positive reaction as non-existent interest, so be it. There is certainly interest in what you are doing, even if you don't get hundreds of messages about it. There will and always be the dozen bunch of people happy for every bit of asset provided by people to improve the game, even if they don't directly express themself.

This is the official HP replacement: Go to https://partsurfer.hp.com/?searchtext=22j68aar the link may not work right, but partsurfer is what you need.

Tried it on 1, tried it on 5. Still an issue unfortunately. It’s a shame they’re not hall sensors like the two sliders.

He has! Here you can see the MAX REV on the throttle.