Leaderboard

The new gang assembled...

Hey Flag, Honestly not sure where those foreign objects are coming from but as mentioned she will be recreated. I will check mine to see if I see them as well. Supersylph, Thanks for that update. Cattmury has been working on an updated version of her. I will take her down and upload the latest version. After I release the next AI Ship Mod. I will start working backward on the older mods. Thank you all for notifying me of the Mod issues. You can also PM me if you have issues. Below is a Taiwanese version of the Kidd. A few of the Kidd DDGs were sold to Taiwan. The USS Kidd, Callaghan, Scott, and Chandler. I will also create a Spruance version of the model as well. Everything that's colored will be removed from the Spruance Class and replaced.

Working on the next update of the US Infantry assets. Here is a clip of the rifleman with a suppressed M4 assaulting an airfield.

US Infantry (USA) version 1.2.0 released! Changelog Version 1.2.0 Added M4 AR soldier Added M240 GPMG soldier Added M249 LMG soldier Added M4/M203 AR/GL soldier Added FIM-92K Stinger soldier Changed M136 84 mm HEAT projectile model

Многим в первую очередь хотелось бы исправления багов и контента в виде миссий и кампаний, а не дополнительных свистелок-перделок и новых багов.

А я бы сделал. Специально для Логана. Чтобы он возил с собой этот бк (естественно, с учетом доп веса в кабине и пр.) и при желании сел в поле и часа полтора (а лучше два), не меньше, реального времени перезаряжался. И чтобы в меню при этом выйти не смог.

Well, I guess it depends. It's no secret that my assets in general require more performance since I use more polys and 4K textures. I had 200 M4 soldiers take a stroll over a field without any drop in fps. I run a 13700K/RTX3080/4K. At 500 guys I noticed a 10 fps drop.

Hi CurrentHill, Thanks for all your superb Mods ! Any chance we get some day one of these two Black Sea hovercraft catamarans, known as Project 1239 "Bora" class corvette ? See : https://russianships.info/eng/warships/project_1239.htm and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bora-class_corvette

This is weird business practice. You are offering a product (SC) and announcing features that may or may not work with third party modules? We are not talking about an unofficial mod but a thing you earn money for. Also you disrupt the ecosystem and force people to change behavior to use different products BOUGHT from you like configs (happened with the burble). Honestly you should review this.

I have no interest in vsn F4 knowing the F4 from heatblur is "close' if there was no F4 on the horizon I might try it. But I have no interest knowing the quality Heatblur delivers. Would be like eating a packet of mustard right before a $500 steak dinner at a 3 Michelin star restaurant.

Thanks for your feedback. Press LAlt + T.

Я бы еще от нормального мануала не отказался. В текущем, например, радиостанции вообще не описываются, а это не самая очевидная часть вертолета.

using the SA Seacat now. dynamic wet deck new wake

I am investigating this behaviour. Thanks for the track, @Moonshine.

AIM-9B/J - rear aspect heaters => Seeker needs to be uncaged. AIM-9JULI - Juliet with a Lima seeker (all aspect) => Seeker needs to be uncaged. R550 Magic 1 - rear aspect heater => Seeker magically uncages itself. Eats flares like I eat éclairs. R550 Magic 2 - all aspect heater (best heater for the F1) => Seeker magically uncages itself. R530 IR - BFM* rear aspect (and limited 3-9 line capability) heater => Can only be carried on C/L station or inboard wing-stations. Use the C/L station. R530EM - BFM* all aspect Fox 1 (acts like a pitbull on a playground in a furball) => Can only be carried on C/L station or inboard wing-stations. Use the C/L station. S530F - one Fox 1 to own them all => If Jesus had a missile. That's about it. Unless Aerges decides in the future to implement the V3B or C and Python 3/ V3S missile carried by Equador and South Africa. ____ * Big Fat Momma

We have both carrier sqds and non carrier sqds within the wing (132nd Virtual Wing), we had 10 hornets and 2 tomcats on the carrier on last sunday's comat event. We do our best to simulate carrier ops as IRL, with zip lip procedures, pre-brief launch and recovery cycles and all that. As the original poster wrote, simply respawning etc won't work for us as we try to immerse ourselves as real as it gets. now, many of those carrier-based flights had tight integration with land-based sqds with regards to time on station, and time on target. That matters a lot for our operations (opening of SEAD windows against IADS networks etc, CAP/SWEEP being on station before the A-G flights arrive etc etc) No matter how much our individual flight-leads plan their sorties (and a lot of the playtime goes into planning, which is fun!), but no matter how much we plan and practice: A singel stuck jetblast door ruins the timing, and more importantly, as its an obvious bug, ruins the immersion. It happened on several events now. Please, give some more love to the supercarrier module, I realize such bugs or many of them only happen in multiplayer, but maybe a simple code could be impleneted that checks when a JBD remains open for xxx amount of seconds respawn it or something. Ofc dear Nineline, I can understand that you guys need trackfiles and bugreports, and I will try to grab it from our server for that event, but in either case, those stuck JBDs are something that can be very disruptive for us. Not complaining, just hoping that those could be adressed. many thanks!

As I mentioned in the post above, I don't have a M2KM readily available. I can't just take a wheeled or tracked Tor and strap it to the deck. The M2KM is the standalone version that can be put on a truck bed or a ship deck. If I find a suitable model I might add it in the future, as an option.

Well, I legally got around that and my manuals are on there way to a developer now.

Sorry @Swiss-Sim but everything what you wrote about the TrackIR is bull<profanity>. I know VR is not the best when it comes to performance. Did you really ever own TrackIR5? I don't believe you! Before i got my TrackIR last week, i tested FacetracknoIR and it was horrible, the delay was like 3 seconds, i trashed it after 30 minutes. Then i installed the OpenTRack and AITrack and yes it was way better. I tested my 30 FPS webcam, it was nice, but it felt like DCS runs on 30 FPS. Then i purchased a 60 FPS webcam for 50 bucks and yes it was much better than the 30 FPS, make sense right? I actually was looking for 120 FPS webcam, but those are more expensive than TrackIR5, no point to get such one. I used the 60 FPS webcam with Opentrack + AITrack and every time i was playing, after 30 min. my eyes were hurting and had bad headache. Then i realized it is because of the head tracking, it didn't run smoothly enough for my eyes. Then i played with several settings and spend some hours, but i was not able to resolve this issue. Then i finally got my TrackIR5 Gaming Set for 260 bucks. I would even pay 300 or 350 bucks. This is the best investment ever made and every penny is worth it. Its just smooth, easy to set up, very good software, it runs almost like VR 1:1, no headache any more, eyes are not hurting and i can set up my profile as i wish within seconds. This product may be old, but it simply works, absolutely not issues and DCS make so much fun now, as never before. For sure, for those who cant effort TrackIR5, OpenTrack + AITrack + 5,- Bucks 30 FPS webcam will do the job, but if you can afford, for the sake of your eyes get the TrackIR5, you wont ever regret. I have no idea, why it works such good, but i dont want to play DCS never again without TrackIR5. There is nothing comparable or alternative to TrackIR5, prove me wrong! Thank you

Без шуток, думал об этом, чтобы закрасить, или ещё что-то сделать. Только вот светит прям сильно, сильно, что с лёгкостью просвечивает палец. Нужно просить, чтобы правили прошивку. В противном случае, кусачки. С Вашего позволения, отвечу не только на Ваш вопрос, постараюсь описать разные режимы, степень затяжеления механизма. Ход регулировочных винтов очень большой, где от слабой затяжки, до максимально возможной, нужно сделать много оборотов. Оборотов действительно много. При совсем ослабленных зажимах, руды болтаются крайне легко и не держатся в центральном положении и шлёпаются в край оси, движение рычагов лёгкое, как и должно быть. Далее перейду сразу к степени зажатия, где РУДы уже не сползают с положения примерно 95%. На этой степени затяжеления РУДами двигать уже довольно тяжело, усилие в 530грамм при сдвигании с 5% и при страгивании почти такое же значение. Создаётся впечатление, что каждая ручка весит по пол килограмма, при НЕТТО комплектации Standart 2280 грамм. Срыв с точки происходит очень плавно, будто ручки находятся в очень густой субстанции. Молодцы, сделали на твёрдую пятёрочку здесь. Установлен V-образный детент, но установлен так, что ролик не полностью опускается за упор детента, потому, к значению можно прибавить примерно 5%. Максимальное значене, чтобы преодолеть V-образный детент достигало 1720 грамм. В сильно затянутых винтах затяжеления РУДы двигаются крайне тяжело, платформа начинает скользить даже с чистыми ножками по стеклу. Максимально затягивать не стал, боясь нарушить механизм, или просто сломать, хотя затягивал уже довольно сильно. Да и нужно ли? Ну и позвольте по личным ощущениям и простым языком. Когда ручки РУДов не сползают с положения 95%, а они именно сползают медленно, если ослабить чуть ... В общем, при такой фиксации мне бы лично, хотелось чуть ослабить ход, но тогда РУДы начинают сползать. Детенты тоже, может чуть увеличить. Но при всех моих хотелках, РУДы работают отлично, детент ни разу в боях DCS не перепрыгнул в положение STOP, двигать РУДами комфортно и приятно. Ну и кому интересно, замеры проводил электронным безменом, привязанным за обе ручки сразу, в районе, где ладонь давит на ручки. Просто не думаю, что кому-то нужны уж точные замеры. Времени потратил не мало и думаю, что заслужил "СПАСИБО" в виде лайка ))) Всем приятных полётов.

Whenever you try to spawn on the Supercarrier but get the 'Your flight has been delayed' message (mostly due to other aircraft already on the deck), the aircraft's performance substantially changes for the worse IF the player changes slots before the deck is clear to spawn. It appears like the plane's weight becomes much higher than it should be from what can be seen in the ME/rearming window. To test this, I created a mission which tries to spawn the player on the catapult, which is initially blocked by AIs. Once the AIs despawn (after 15s), the player spawns in. Taking off and flying on-speed in landing configuration showcases the issue. If you DO NOT change slots and wait for the AI do despawn, on-speed is 144 kts. If you DO change to the other slot (which has exactly the same loadout), on-speed is 158. This corresponds to roughly 8000lbs in weight difference. I remember there was a similar (if not the same) bug back before the SC got released. HB eventually fixed it, IIRC citing issues with fuel weight initialization which done twice for a delayed flight with slot change. Two tracks are attached to showcase the issue. If somebody wants to reproduce himself using the attached mission, do the following: -Choose a slot -Choose the other slot within 15s. -Wait for your spawn Aircraft weight is set to 60000lbs in the ME (no rails) for both slots. For comparison, do not change slots prior to spawning and you will not see the excessive weight. This issue has been haunting our wing's (and probably several other peoples) MP missions for quite some time and I hope HB can come up with a solution. Takeoff_without_weight_bug.trk Takeoff_with_weight_bug.trkF14_weight_bug_test.miz

taking a NAV-Fix with the TGP seems to not be putting the "updated" steerpoint location where i designated it using the same procedure as explained by wags here; <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBHrEzLGSqw and here: https://forum.dcs.world/topic/209147-viper-mini-updates/?do=findComment&comment=4992813 OFLY works fine, HUD works fine and FCR works but is a pain as it constantly resets the crosshair during sweeps, having to start over Track attached, mission date 1980 to ensure GPS isnt available NAV-FIX_with_TGP_broken.trk

Only for seated VR (flight sim / sim racing), but so the Crystal weighs less than 800 grams. For more relief simply add more pulleys.

Really the only thing inappropriate was the comment section. The skin was no big deal.

I'll see if I can get an answer.

I made new 84 mm HEAT projectile for the M136/AT4.

Impressive whining though. He's only posted ninety times in four-years yet managed to get something killed off faster than I've ever seen. I still think we new a new forum section where we can all cry about being offended and demand that things be removed.

Old school here

Love those... more of them pls BTW: we are missing a proper "downed pilot" for CSAR missions. There are some other mods for this, but they are having a bad habit to break IC... while your mods are completely clean.... pls pls

Artilleriecomputer: Anny way to get/or one can make a Artilleriecomputer, App?. I found this: An with "TheWay" to enter Targaets. And then like this:

ARMA? ;-)

There’s LCAC mod around. Dunno if it works with the latest DCS version though.

LINK: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3333009/ Kudos to Minsky for his fantastic blank texture template and other default texture fixes. VMU-1 Watchdogs and VMU-3 Phantoms MQ-9A Reaper skins. Enjoy!

It was a Mig-21 skin depicting an ISIS aircraft ... as I said, no more offensive than a german skin of the Nazi era.

Thanks a lot @funkyfranky there is always something new to learn in this forum. Have a nice day!

Эти парни тоже, но у них выбора нет, начальник стоит над головой [emoji23]

Thank you!

I have no doubt about it SD. For those that cant wait Nam has already come to Manston (the tail wheel is off the ground BTW)

I just updated my gear, and got better framerate/zero jerky, and the Gazelle started to shine even more. -One of the joyful things are the thin skin that let sounds through. Hearing all explotions and gunfire makes for some dramatic atmosphere, and adrenalinetrigging situations. For some minutes yesterday, it was my favourite experience with DCS.

Vietnam would be great but I think ED may already be working secretly on it. We can already see their SEA grass experiments on every map in the game........

К сожалению, мы пропустили это предложение от ED. Иначе, конечно же приняли бы участие в этом празднике.

Download links are available at the top of the page now

Amnesty International.

Use https://github.com/Jabbah/OpenXR-Layer-OBSMirror which will capture the output of Quad-Views-Foveated and therefore the same exact image you see in the headset.

There's no such thing as bad weather. Only bad clothes... Sent from my MAR-LX1A using Tapatalk

Actually you can, and people do so all the time. I believe what you meant is that a comparison between a 'mere' mod and an official module may be akin to an 'apple to oranges' comparison. The problem is that, especially without being able to compare them side by side, to many people it seems more like a "Granny Smith" to "Golden Delicious" comparison - they look the same, and both fly, after all. So the least that a vendor should do is to point to the differences, and assert that they are enough to warrant a purchase. It's not self-evident, and merely saying "you can't compare those" appears disingenuous to me, people simply do, they can't help themselves, they don't know how not to do: it's natural to do so. Luckily, the '14 day trial' available from ED may help convince people and help them make up their minds. That being said, I can't wait for ED to release the Herc (which is a day zero purchase for me, and I adore Anubis' version from a few moons past. I don't need a 14 day trial...)

Baltic Dragon "The Gamblers" F-16C Campaign incoming.

Project 22160 Patrol Ship (Russia) version 1.0.0 released! Changelog Version 1.0.0 Release version

Новости в последнее время ни о чем. Когда 2.9?

For those who love realism, i decided to create the Wake files: Orlan.lods.ship_wake