Leaderboard

PzH 2000 SPG 1.0.0 released! Changelog Version 1.0.0 Release version Known issues Firing M982 Excalibur doesn't produce a muzzle flash due to DCS limitations Usage In Mission Editor use Fire at point and use Unguided for M1711 and Guided for M982. The trajectory for the M982 isn't perfect, I had to workaround DCS limitations as usual.

While fixing the missile dimensions error with the NASAMS 3 AMRAAM-ER, I also added the AIM-9X-2 to it.

The first version of foveated rendering for Quest Pro will release very soon. It will be a separate tool, incompatible with OpenXR Toolkit. However it includes its own CAS sharpening and Turbo mode, two of the most appreciated features of OpenXR Toolkit. Compatibility with OpenXR Toolkit may happen later. Also to be very clear on the expectations: it will NOT work with Virtual Desktop. This is out of my control: Virtual Desktop uses SteamVR, and the SteamVR OpenXR support doesn't let you do eye tracking. It will require the use of Air Link or Link Cable.

Небольшой прогресс

NASAMS 3 SAM 1.2.0 released! Changelog Version 1.2.0 Added AIM-9X-2 LN Changed NASAMS 3 LN engine sounds Fixed ECM burn through range Fixed AMRAAM-ER model dimension issue

Переводы с синхронным текстом костыль, который "прокатывает" с миссиями обучения, когда есть время внимательно прочитать и выполнить. В целом по переводу есть несколько моментов. Во первых, собственно перевод. Разные тексты переводятся по разному. Иногда, автор использует общую лексику (с этим проблем нет), некоторые специальную (с этим сложнее, но стандартная летная фразеология это не очень сложно), но некоторые используют жаргонизмы (тут даже специальные словари )) особых выражений, не всегда в тему. ( ). М... еще момент. Что бы грамотно перевести миссию, приходится её "разбирать" построчно. И летать потом, самому её не интересно. Нет интриги, все знаешь. ) Иногда миссия написана не стандартными средствами редактора. а творчески )). Тут без согласия с автором, никак. И в целом, сурьезные авторы просят гарантию того, что при переводе не будет искажен смысл.. Авторские права, особенно если рассматривать платные кампании. Согласие автора + администрации DCS. И последнее. Миссии в кампании содержат тысячи сообщений, для создания фона задачи, который позволяет ощутить себя в реальном боевом вылете. Озвучка русских текстов. Делали 3-х голосую озвучку бесплатной официальной кампании модуля "Газель". Но это делали толпой, а потом в коопе летали ). Атмосферрно.... Но DCS, он не статичен. Постоянно надо поддерживать работоспособность сделанного. И да, к слову, уметь "слышать" радиообмен, это одна из важных составных частей обучения военного летчика в реале. Просто в миссиях обучении внимательно слушайте английскую речь, Вам важно научиться понимать о чем говорят не по словам, а в целом, уловить смысл фразы по контексту действия. И запомнить фразу, а не слово. Говорить не научитесь, тут надо учить слова и т.д., а понимать , вполне реально. Погружение в языковую среду. О хорошем. Пишите в личку, что нибудь придумаем. Вайпер, он же Сокол ), это то, что является моим хобби в DCS. Появилось время и возможность, сейчас редактирую РЛЭ, с учетом крайних изменений в модуле. Почти год, не корректировал, к концу месяца, возможно закончу. Обычный путь вирпила : обучение - миссии - кампании - кооп(ы) ПВЕ - кооп(ы) ПВП - онлайн одинокого волка .... ) Удачи в небе ДКС!!

Hello DCS Community The new release v0.3.0 of Digital Crew Chief (DCC) is now available. Download User Manual Discord Invite Youtube What is Digital Crew Chief (DCC)? DCC is an app which (will) provides a set of tools to make the life of a digital pilot easier. Our goal with DCC is no frills, just fly! For the start only the dynamic campaign is available with more to come. What is the DCC – Dynamic Campaign? The Dynamic Campaign creates DCS Mission within a persistent scenario, similar to Falcon BMS and DCS Liberation. Nearly all planes & helicopters (except WW2) are now flyable. How does the Campaign work? The campaign is defined by two definitions, Scenario and faction. There are presets for faction but also custom factions can be created and used. Once the campaign is started each site/faction tries to achieve the defined win condition automatically. The player can always choose to occupy one (or more) of the planned or active flight group/mission and play the mission out in DCS. After flying the mission in DCS the results are processed back into the campaign. Hardcore Mode? You can choose at campaign start to activate the hardcore mode. Hardcore means if you (or a client in multiplayer) dies in a mission the campaign fails. DCC and Dynamic Campaign are still in early development and limited in scope at the moment. We will provide new scenarios and features in the near future.

Hello everyone, recently we have been able to reproduce the nose wheel issue so we have worked to fix this annoying problem. With this message I would like to ask you to test our work before to include in the next release of the game and to report back the results of your individual test on this post on our discord. Before to install the new files, remember to make a backup of the old ones. In the.rar attached to this message you will find three different files: Config.lua MB-339A.lua MB-339APAN.lua Go to: <YOUR_DCS_ROOT_FOLDER>\DCS World OpenBeta\Mods\Aircraft\MB-339\FM Replace the Config.lua file Then go to: <YOUR_DCS_ROOT_FOLDER>\DCS World OpenBeta\CoreMods\aircraft\MB-339 Replace the MB-339A.lua and MB-339APAN.lua files. Thank you for your time and your patience. Nosewheel_Fix_RC1.rar

一如既往的出色工作，我想问一下 PHL-03 是否在您的名单上？PHL-03 是中华人民共和国的车载自行式 12 管 300 毫米远程多管火箭发射器。如果这种远程火箭发射器能出现在DCS中，那将是非常酷的。

we do already have a report open for RPG effectiveness against air targets especially at longer ranges, also the RPG round does seem to be to fast currently. thanks

That prevents flameout. Lower it to the lockout, and wait for your speed to drop. You can disable lockout, but then your engine is likely to flame out unless you know what you're doing. Lockout is at around 1.20 mach.

I got a skin pack coming for this bird from VA-94 "Mighty Shrikes" from the Vietnam era in 1969. I have painfully dug up information on 15 aircraft, Modex, BuNo ect. Not all references have pilot names because I simply cannot read them. I was thinking for the ones I do not have them I could add your names to the A/C? And even an aircraft name such as "Jaunty Jan" see on MODEX 402 BuNo 2031 flown by CDR Richard D. Lazenby, CO, VA-94. I need to find out who the CAG and DCAG were for Modex 400 & 401. These will all have custom hard numbers painted on the birds. Anyhow, I have the following available for community pilots. Your real names must be used for immersion reasons. I will put the rank on for you, cant be too top heavy. Let me know what your aircraft nickname is (goes on the dorsal hump). Please ensure it is something that would appear in the Vietnam era like "Red Rider", "Suzie Q", "Boom Boom Betty" ect: 403 410 414 415

Real pilot, flight sim enthusiast for 30 years, beta tester for some of them, real pilot, 3,000hrs fly often in the backcountry, and off airport, also a warbird in which I do aerobatics and dogfight simulations. DCS WWII planes are amazing, they feel realistic, the landings , the take offs, stalls, the feel of flight is there, wake turbulence is spot ON, damage model is very detailed , quite impressive really, some stuff might need a bit of tuning, but overall great. All of this amazing effort goes down the drain when playing in MP and the plane in front of you starts to jink up and down positive Gs , Negatives Gs and lots of impossible aerobatics like a super human, because he even does not get tired, and can perform this stunts forever, once this happens DCS WWII feels and looks very arcade, have you ever seen this kind of maneuvers in WWII gun cam footage? Not even close. If developers can fix this , DCS WWII would become an amazing simulator, the other sim got it quite good (only thing that it beats DCS IMHO). Its my only real complain, but it really ruins immersion, the rest of the sim its really amazing.

Wikileaks said DPRK's Musudan MRBM missiles have been exported to Iran. Now you don't have to put a SCUD to the coast of Persian Gulf, because it has a short range. In addition, you can hit objects in Israel from Syria with powerful HE warhead. And in the Pacific too. Unfortunately, Musudan is a great target for air attacks and for modern missile defense. https://www.mediafire.com/file/88ncs9qolouz1kd/Musudan_SSM_1.0.rar/file

Can we please have the control input for switching Shkval between 23x / 7x with a single button? Other 2 way-switches already have this control option (AP/HE and fire rate HI/LO for example). Thx.

And big thanks to you! @mimamema has been my prime beta tester, helped find issues and fine-tune the experience! I wouldn't go quite far without folks like you helping!

Do not use the autohover functions, they are buggy and are in process of being redone. Autopilot lights will be yellow (top) when out of conditions, green (bottom) when in condition and active. Jerky torque effect is caused by you moving the collective too rapidly and surging the engine. Maintain smooth collective movements. Remember that pedal input also affects torque, and collective input affects yaw.

Whoopsie, I hate it when I accidentally add capability.

Hi, as soon as the teams are happy it is ready for the stable update it will happen, but currently we have no date for that. It obviously depends on the whole of DCS and its stability in open beta, we are currently gathering data and fixing issues that have been found. thank you for your patience.

Of course it`s big and yellow (will stand out on a grass field preaty well), excellent target for practice.

https://www.currenthill.com/rdr RWR

This is the exact reason why it should be done for DCS World. I for one love DCS modules because each of them not only shows its values and advantages in historical development over other aircraft but teaches us its shortcomings, too, and help understand and experience the need for further development that led to advanced aircraft. I'm not too concerned about multiplayer balancing. This is done by mission creators. Real aircraft developers never cared for balance but for superiority. DCS is much more than PvP for me.

I disagree that the over G damage is cumulative in DCS, I’ve seen no evidence that it is without some kind of other external battle damage. I would love to see what a real F15 would look like after a typical DCS dogfight. It would probably make it back home, but it certainly wouldn’t fly right. I’m no proponent of an unrealistic wing break mechanic either. Other things break first - panels pop and increase or create asymmetric drag, engine mounts break, non-solid state avionics, radars, control surfaces, etc. More severely the rigging and trim is going to be thrown out by even very minor bending or twisting, which will make it fly crooked and play hell with the FLCS (if equipped). The only module that models this level of granular detail is the Tomcat (and still fairly rudimentary) Its not just about breaking the wings, it’s the other loss of capability that’s going to factor into the fight. People love to boast about how realistic DCS is, until it becomes inconvenient to their play style, at which time they simply try to justify it away. Anyway I’ve said my piece and I don’t want to drag this off topic any longer. But on topic, perhaps one of the reasons the 16 struggles is it’s the only module that doesn’t have some kind of unrealistic exploit that can be leveraged. No paddle, FLCS breakers, flaps or ability to Over G. Might be why I prefer it, despite everything - it feels like the purest, cleanest flight model. If you get beat in a viper v viper fight, you know it’s because the other guy was better than you, not because he gamified the edge cases of the flight model.

Пилотажная группа на вертолётах Ми-8МТВ2 Желающие принять участие - пишите в личку

I really liked the idea of limiting posts on this Unofficial Thread, where we can see latest news, I really loved it since we were being spammed with everyone posting whatnot in the thread. Thanks for saving us from those posts. But now days I click on the thread since it has new posts and those are not news, nothing new is shown there only YouTube creators videos. I mean latest post is from a YouTuber teaching how to drop laser guided bombs using unreleased module... why is that even a thing? I don't see news there, they are only spamming news thread with stuff we already know, news WAS that F-15E is in pre-purchase, news WAS that it will use certain amount of weapon types, we already knew that months ago. So I don't see anything new here. Please moderate this thread so it provides news only.

Assuming it is correctly implemented, already: Wait 30 seconds before starting the APU a second time, after the compressor has spooled down. If the second attempt fails wait 20 minutes, no more than three failed attempts.

Engine/governor needs some tuning, I suspect NG is too low when power requirement is low.

I agree (+100000) though i think that it would require to develop the older scope (at least for the pre C-200 version) and modify accordingly the radar. Only Aerges know if that would be a no go - build from scratch - effort or basically a more ''removing'' some functionality from the existing code ( like TEL, BZ radar modes, MTI filter, include rapid gun instead of SW / gun selection etc) and add some secondary only things work (+ the respective 3D part), that would be way more easy to be developed. And i could also add in the wishlist the CG variant that has some interesting features (like 4 SW, ALR-66 rwr, altitude alert system).

okay thanks for the reply ED Team, as always you are doing a stellar job!

Nice! I remember seeing it as being a mod, but wasn't aware that this might turn into a full-fledged module! In that case, I suppose two different models of roughly the same aircraft are currently in production! For clarity: - OctopusG would appear to be making an earlier variant of a Su-17/-22 based on the cockpit images. - AviaStorm (if it takes on the project), seems to be making pretty much the last complete interation of a Su-17M4 (Su-22M4 for export). It would be most modern one. Good stuff!

He has mentioned that making DCS videos was his "job". Whatever that really means. But making videos like the one below must have taken some time. Some people have said GR videos are superficial, and some are. But they also make great in-depth tutorials. Who else is doing 45-minute tutorials on just one aspect of the systems? Cap definitely deserves acknowledgment as a serious DCS content creator. I think he's one of the best.

I dont know what you guys want to prove here. Watch the videos about folds of honor where there was G limits introduced and monitored. It was done for the fly by wire aircraft too. Because you can catch the G limiter off guard. More in the F18 than the F16. As the F18 relies more on instantaneous turning. It is not unrealistic or gamified. In the F16 you can even trick the G limiter by simply doing a loaded barrel roll. Which is realistic, because the F16 FLCS is only good at monitoring on axis the same time. But in all cases the G limiter ( both F16 and F18) catches back on and does its job as intended. And that kind of over G ing in the F16 is treated as every other aircraft over G ing with an extra in depth inspection and being grounded in first place. Of course there might be still a lot of FLCS behavior wrong in the F16 but in that special case i believe not.

Нашел очень интересный доклад nasa от 2014 года про исследование эффективности различной индикации углов атаки. А так же лекцию с анимацией в ютубе. В кратце по датчикам УА. Сейчас применяется два основных типа датчиков. Vane - привычная нам флюгарка, и Probe - некий зонд измерения полного давления, работающий по принципу определения разности давлений воздуха, поступающего через верхние и нижние порты такого сенсора. С виду штырек, такой и стоит на F-15E и многих других зарубежных самолетах. Насколько знаю, такого типа датчики устанавливаются на современных версиях самолетов семейства Су-27. В кратце по индикаторам. На зарубежных самолетах их несколько типов используется: индикация непосредственно градусов углов атаки, индикация нормализованных единиц (normalized units) и неких произвольных единиц (arbitrary units). С первыми всё понятно, это Советско-Российский стандарт. Вторые используются для привязки к чему-то тоже конкретному (отношение скорости сваливания к текущей, располагаемые запас подъемной силы и т.д.). Третье используется в некоторых зарубежных военных самолетах, включая F-15E, и очень похоже на то, что шкала этих arbitrary units является шкалой обычных градусов, только с началом отсчета от 0 до 45, а не от, предположим -10 градусов до +35 градусов. Зачем так, им виднее, возможно был нужен переход на только положительные значения. NASA.pdf

Yeah I get the indication, those 2 rear wheels go down slowly that's why it happens, started happening few patches ago.

I agree with the consensus that rudder control above 25 units is lacking. Like Spurts said, you need to cross control it with stick in the opposite direction of the desired roll to get the plane to turn. I'm not sure if this is accurate or not, but it contradicts mission 01 of Speed and Angels which instructs you to max the AOA and "use rudder only for turns". (It's not possible in the current OB to roll the jet this way without some cross control). I believe Paco, a real life SME, advised on the campaign, so that makes me wonder if rudder control should be adjusted.

Почет не при чем. Международный язык авиации - английский. Большинство любителей авиации мира его понимают.

Wo , tripod3 ,you are great ! It's wonderful !!! I suggest that north korean should give your a medal of honour !

There is nothing "broken" about jester at all, I was using the jester to drop LGBs on Sunday with no problem. There is nothing for HB to fix. Were you releasing the bomb within the correct parameters, following the steering cue and releasing when the timer reaches zero?

No this isn't true of any high performance fighter since WWII. At top speeds the airframes produce so much lift that parasite drag is much more of a factor at military power than induced drag is from gross weight. F16 at 15,000 ft stores gross weight knots at MIL 500 lbs of fuel clean 20,693 533 7163 clean 27,355 531 500 7,507 27,906 481 500 8,512 28,911 478 F18 at 15,000 ft stores gross weight knots at MIL 432 lbs of fuel clean 25,986 539 10,479 clean 36,032 536 432 6526 32,051 479 432 10,512 36,037 474 (For the Hornet the stores are 8*mk82 and 8*mk83, the difference in speed is but 5 knots yet the difference in weight is 4000lbs. So at MIL 4000lbs is nothing. But those pylons a human could play football with are what slows fighter jets down... at MIL.) Comparing the Viper and Hornet at military power isn't fair because the Viper's airframe produces much less lift and therefore has much less parasite drag than the Hornet. But as you can see at military power neither aircraft is much affected by gross weight. So comparing the airframes at corner speed rather than MIL would be much more apt. The parasite drag would have less of an effect on speed and the induced drag from the added weight would get pretty nasty I bet. Then you could really compare the airframes

yeah, current implementation is not very good. there is another thread about it already...

Respect for interacting so much with the community. Im enjoying this stunning map. Great work.

Syria map is an excellent map. We do not plan to expand the map beyond our borders. But within our borders, we plan and will improve it, as it was intended in all the announced phases of our project.

Thank you all for taking the time to find the bugs. We really appreciate the community, thanks again for your help! All bugs from this topic are added to our local bug tracker system, bug name is the name of the topic you created. After the bugs are fixed, I can make a report and you can see that they are fixed. (because there is no other connection with bugs in our system and forum, I think it will be a good option to find out that your bug has been corrected) Request: Do not write several problems in one topic, we may miss something in this case, it is better to create a separate topic for each bug There are duplicate bugs, but that's okay - we link them together ourselves in our bug tracker system. @BIGNEWY please pin this topic

I believe Floyd1212 was being sarcastic in stating to read that thread, for the very reason it was chock full of a lot of misinformation, ranging from slightly inaccurate to downright outlandish. I've unpinned that thread to prevent any confusion in the future, since Bradmick's video tutorial thread is a lot more useful, accurate, and is from someone that has thousands of hours flying and instructing the real AH-64D. @bradmick and myself flew the real AH-64D for many years, so if we are refuting another's claims about the AH-64, it comes from a place of real-world knowledge and experience. There have been a number of self-proclaimed "experts" on these forums that have made some pretty interesting statements in the past about the AH-64 (and helicopters in general), and so if you see Brad or myself refuting them, that is the reason why and the source behind our responses.

You can also cycle between those format by pressing CTRL+Y (CTRL+Z on some different language keyboards).

FWIW, myself and our pilot SME use the VKB F-14 stick with at least a 10cm extension. A lot of the problems people are having here are likely hardware related. Also I can't reiterate enough how much better FFB sticks are for getting a feel for the jet and the trim. It's unfortunate that most current consumer offerings aren't great or are really expensive. Keep in mind that a trim state only exists at a particular flight condition, if you move away from that flight condition (change in speed, altitude, power, etc) the trim state will change. The F-14 itself also has a TON of movable surfaces including the WINGS themselves, which essentially makes it a different airplane at every degree of sweep. The F-14 is a fighter, it was not designed to be as stable as a Cessna 172 or an airliner.

Version 4.1.3 released https://github.com/the-paid-actor/dcs-dtc/releases/tag/4.1.3 New Features - [General] Updated airbases to include Sinai map (by FireNLD) - [F16] Add OA/VIP/VRP input - [F16] Add laser start time setting - [F16] Expand range of configurable laser codes - [F18] Bullseye WP selection - [F18] Adds ILS channel selection - [F18] Adds option to hide map on HSI Bugfixes - [General] Reworked coordinate capture and conversion - [General] Adjust in-cockpit upload to after 1s elapsed, instead of only after releasing the button - [General] Switching presets without restarting caused multiple presets to be uploaded together - [F16] Fixes ILS frequency not completing with zeros - [F18] Capture coordinate from F10 map on incorrect format - [F18] If on TAC page on right DDI it breaks waypoint input - [F18] Supports properly 3 decimal digits on radios - [F18] Fixes AP TacBlim to not depend on jet configuration