Mustang25

Do we know if it's getting Durandals and BAP-100s? Also in my wildest dreams, I would love to see the CEM1 multistore carrier.

How fast were you going? There is a maximum release speed but I can't remember what it is off the top of my head. M0.85 maybe?

I believe that got fixed in the last patch too so it should be good to go for all the rain presets.

Given the choice between vague Boeing marketing material and the actual Strike Eagle Dash-1, I know which number I'm going to choose to believe.

Most of the airbases are bugged it seems and Ugra refuses to acknowledge the problem or do anything about it. Been this way for months now.

Strike Eagles with CFTs have a limit of M2.0. Without CFTs it's M2.3

Unless Deka has changed their mind with the addition of loadout restrictions, their stance has always been that if it's been done IRL and there's visual or documentation proof then they'll add it into the game. So far it seems that IRL, nothing forward firing gets loaded on the inner pylons.

Can't believe this is still an issue that hasn't even been addressed let alone fixed. @NineLine, @BIGNEWY not even an acknowledgement that this is a problem more than 3 months later??

This has been a bug since HARMs were first released but apparently ED doesn’t want to fix it.

Despite Wags’ best efforts to convince us otherwise, the JSOW A and all the other non-SFW clusters are just totally useless. There’s no point using any of them.

DTOS is dive toss which is a separate delivery mode from CCIP or CCRP. WA is indeed weather avoidance but capability does not exist in the DCS module. In TA you can see the radar scale along the side of the MFD just like any other radar mode.

Different aircraft will have their quirks on how they build track files and differences in scan volume, etc. between radars but the general concept of RWS and TWS is the same between jets. IRL TWS is supposed to be a lot less reliable than it is in DCS as it does not seem to model a lot of the downsides of that mode.

I haven’t had the chance to use the 105s yet, are the wind settings actually editable and do they actually work?

Have you actually flown the aircraft? The lack of a proper manual is a certainly a glaring omission but the actual aircraft is one of the most complete modules out there just as it was when it was first released. Calling this a low is just... ignorant?

lol, the history of the DCS community has shown this to be entirely untrue.

There’s a map-wide bug where a lot of aircraft won’t fit in the HAS and hangar spaces even though they should. I reported it over a month ago but nobody has acknowledged the problem.

Good to hear from you guys! If I may ask, what other items do you have left for for EA development? Are there any big new features we can look forward to in the future? Thanks and keep up the good work!

“Might” and “intended” provides zero reference for if/when the USAF actually adopted the (v)9. Also the first link you provided isn’t a primary source and I don’t see any further references there to verify that information. your second source is also just a budget request for the development of the (v)10 and makes no indication of an IOC date. the third source just says priority consideration. Not even that it will be installed or when. not saying you’re wrong but the sources you provided are circumstantial at best.

I'd look at [install directory]\Mods\aircraft\F-16C\Cockpit\Scripts\Displays\HUD\indicator\HUD_init.lua and [install directory]\Mods\aircraft\F-16C\Cockpit\Scripts\HMD\indicator\HMD_init.lua Should be the files you're looking for

This is still a problem after the latest patch. @NineLine or @BIGNEWY can we get any acknowledgement from you or Ugra about this?

Still nothing from Ugra?

Transmit Switch IFF In and Transmit Switch IFF Out are the keybinds for it. Out short will toggle DL tracks and Inboard short will step through a couple filter options. Manual pg 160-161 explains it in more detail.

TMS Down should reject/reset any deltas.

You need to adjust your scan volume to match the datalink contact's altitude. You can see that for both, the empty red symbols mean that you have a datalink track but your own radar cannot see them. You can refer to pg 157 of the official manual for more info on datalink symbology.

Can anyone from Ugra or @BIGNEWY / @NineLine comment on this? It’s almost impossible to create realistic scenarios if the airfields can’t support the aircraft that are meant to be based there.