Jump to content

All Activity

This stream auto-updates

  1. Past hour
  2. Разве он не САТ3? Хотя при проработанности ДКС в этом плане это значения и не имеет практически. Сам как еще и Х-плэйнщик заядлый, покупать С-130 вряд ли буду. Хотя вертикальные и транспортные очень уважаю. Все таки самолет такого типа рассчитан на переброску людей и грузов на пару тысяч км и IFR. В отличие от вертолетов, которые работают на гораздо менее удаленных маршрутах и по ПВП. То есть как правильно применять тот же Чинук в мире ДКС мне отлично понятно. А вот с Геркулесом... Гонять от одного угла Сирии до другого чисто по прямой да еще и с статичной погодой? Ну, как то не цепляет пока. Тупо не могу придумать то, что меня бы в нем заинтересовало. Хотя в том же плэйне маршрут Басиль аль Асад - Внуково и обратно, гоняется достаточно регулярно. Но там то и погода и трассы и схемы и УВД....
  3. Has some "claims" with a 3rd Party (OnReTech), will be making a Balkans map.
  4. I'll start by agreeing with our fellow members above - 64GB is still plentyfull, and shall be for a number of years. Buuuuuut..... If this is a brand new higher-end system, then I strongly suggest a 96GB DDR5 kit (2x 48GB) with recommended speed/timings profile ("AMD Expo" or "Intel XMP") for your CPU and motherboard. I'd suggest those from GSKILL. Just make sure that either the RAM manufacturer lists the motherboard you chosen, or that the specific RAM kit is listed in your motherboard's QVL list. This is a guarantee that the specific RAM kit has been tested with the specific motherboard for stability. Lastly, about 128GB. It's problematic on most consumer motherboards and not recommended, as it's usually untested and unstable at desired higher speeds/timings (i.e., get ready to "FAFO").
  5. I did say I thought it was a fine idea. Well sure, when I discovered DCS I didn’t know what it was so of course I’d have read that. That was the A-10C on Steam and I can’t recall how I knew about the manual.
  6. You know there are people on this forum that claims NVGs in DCS are already too good. [emoji4] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
  7. Tomcat has already 4 DLC campaigns: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/shop/modules/tomcat/ ...and more if you count user made content or the ones included in the module. There is still hope for future campaigns but I doubt any creator waits for the end of EA. You have a point though that sometimes it's too early for the campaign if the module is still young and is missing some important functionality. Not in the Tomcat case now although someone might wait ie. for the early F-14A. HB still owes us this one and a campaign
  8. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3345896/ Try this fantastic mod....but single player only. It breaks integrity check. In all honesty a vast improvement to the in-game ones. Hopefully ED add a version of this to the sim in the future.
  9. With the active pedals it could be possible to program the software if you push one pedal forward the other could move into the opposite direction. And if you only have space for one simsetup and the money, it's gonna be a great solution to enjoy racing and flying on the same rig. Edit: I would shoot an email to the company who makes the pedals you are interested in and ask them directly.
  10. I'm a hundred percent on board with you. Pretty sure some of those toys will be implemented down the line. Remember, even AAA flightsims also need 3rd party shiny toys. It's pretty much up to resources. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk
  11. You read descriptions? Good for you! Back in 2016, I Googled free flightsims. Got a hit. Watch some Su-25T video on YT. Hmmm... Strange plane, while it's free. Let's go! Installed. Now, tell me where in that process it would be bad for ED to place links to manuals, both for the Su-25T AND the main game manual. There was nothing in that process that even suggested or even made me think there was manuals. The game was free. Now, please! Please do tell me why it's bad to have better links to manuals? You can't give me one good reason, except that it is unnecessary for you, and then you don't like it. That's your MO in the wishlist section.
  12. I used to use Nvidia Profile Inspector, but now that you can configure it in DCS I rolled back the NVPI overrides and just use the DCS autoexec.cfg config file for it. No other extra software for my VR for this. In theory it should just work, maybe you have a problem with your Nvidia driver? Could try cleaning it out and reinstalling it.
  13. There is no blur setting. You can however install a mod that should make the vision more clear.
  14. A manual is listed in the features of the modules. Although that seems to be missing on the Steam Store descriptions. It’s also rather obvious a game this complex would have them.
  15. I have renamed the files so they should come up un some sort of order on kneeboard forward/back. Also added all of the TACAN ILS approach diagrams. I did not do any of the departure diagrams - but they do exist (around 60). I have included all of the maps that have come up as part of this thread. I'm still looking for Volumes 1 & 2 of the DOD ENAME FLIP - doesn't look like its online anywhere, although I have yet to search the wayback machine data posted earlier. Data on the RAF bases Gutersloh etc would be good. The zip file attached is currently the most complete and supersedes all of the others. Please let me know if you spot any errors - I've not yet tested it Cheers GERMANY MAP Kneeboard v1.1.zip
  16. Hello, can someone help me with NVG settings? I've known for a few years how to increase and decrease the brightness of the view, but I'm wondering if there's a blur setting. I think the view should be clearer than the default.
  17. Please find the third video:
  18. Today
  19. Hey @Steel Jaw, this might have already been fixed. Try and download version 2025-04-26 here: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3326679/ What I had to do was basically delete ALL parked statics on the bow as the directors started to ignore them.
  20. ist für mich so angenehmer und relativ nah an der echten Maschine .) saß erst letztes jahr wieder drinn
  21. Hello, Have you managed to fix this issue? Can we expect a fix in your next update? Sincerely, Michael
  22. and please ensure it is public , unrestricted and unclassified. And a link to the public source in a DM. thank you
  23. If anyone has any publicly available conents
  24. You cannot be on the MARK page of the DED. Just make sure you arent doing that first. Then if it is still happening post a track. I have not had any issues with being able to lock targets after a period of time. If I can't, it is usually because I am on the MARK page of the DED. Just DCS switch RET.
  25. This is no longer a problem after the update in July. Rocket / pylon drag has been greatly reduced.
  1. Load more activity
×
×
  • Create New...