Leaderboard

T-84 Oplot-M MBT (Ukraine) version 1.4.0 released! Changelog Version 1.4.0 Changed engine sound

Project 22160 Patrol Ship (Russia) version 1.1.0 released! Changelog Version 1.1.0 Added pennant number liveries (thanks @HighMaintenanceB)

T-64BV MBT (Ukraine) version 1.2.0 released! Changelog Version 1.2.0 Changed engine sound

ZTZ-99A2 MBT (China) version 1.2.0 released! Changelog Version 1.2.0 Changed engine sound

ZTQ-15 LT MBT (China) version 1.1.0 released! Changelog Version 1.1.0 Changed engine sound

Type 26 Frigate (UK) version 1.2.0 released! Changelog Version 1.2.0 Added air target capability for Mk45 Mod4 naval gun Added tags Changed Sea Ceptor smoke thickness

Project 20831 Steregushchiy Class Corvette (Russia) version 1.2.0 released! Changelog Version 1.2.0 Added exhaust hatches for Kh-35U Changed Kh-35U launch delay

SRS is great, but some people do not want to mess with external apps. They would rather use a ready to go voice chat in game. thanks

LAV-AD SPAAGM (USA) version 1.2.0 released! Changelog Version 1.2.0 Fixed missing IR missile growl

Project 11356R Admiral Grigorovich Frigate (Russia) version 1.1.0 released! Changelog Version 1.1.0 Added India as user Added missing version number in folder structure Added pennant number liveries for Russia and India (thanks @HighMaintenanceB) Changed 3M55M minimum range Changed RBU-6000 loadout to 96 rockets

Challenger 3 MBT (UK) version 1.1.0 released! Changelog Version 1.1.0 Changed APS maximum altitude Removed APS player control

US Infantry (USA) version 1.4.0 released! Changelog Version 1.4.0 Fixed M120 Mortar maximum range Fixed M240 wrong ammo type

@Elo, Your panels looks sweet man! The canopy bow was a bit of a pain in the ass tbh. The main part of the bow is two panels, laminated with spacers made from spare ply in-between. I then skinned it with 3mm MDF. I'll shoot you some better shots of it when I get home. The front section is both an upper and a lower glued together. I then cut two spare strips of 3mm MDF off and then skined the beveled edge on the outside. Good luck with the qualifying exam mother goose, I'm sure you will crush it.

Hey Guys, Thanks for the feedback. As mentioned after my next release I will be working backward to correct a a few issues with some of the AI Ship mods. To include FPS drop on the USS Oak Hill, Blue Ridge, and San Antonio. I will add Allure and CPL Shipping to the list plus many others. It's known that the FPS drop is due to the Collision model created for the USS Oak Hill which I will replace. My Shipyard will be busy. I forgot to mention. Thank you, Flag02004 for sharing the wake files with the community. I really appreciate it. I've found the wake files don't look good on the smaller Corvette size vessels. Project 205 Moskit OSA 1 and OSA 2 are next to be released. Still a WIP!

Swedish Infantry (Sweden) version 1.3.0 released! Changelog Version 1.3.0 Changed Pskott 86 SLPSGR 84 mm HEAT projectile 3D model and textures Fixed Pskott 86 missing launch sound Fixed RBS 57 soldier ability to change target direction

Oshkosh M-ATV MRAP (USA) version 1.1.0 released! Changelog Version 1.1.0 Changed optics to M151 Fixed engine sound

Oshkosh L-ATV (USA) version 1.2.0 released! Changelog Version 1.2.0 Fixed RWS turret issue

Haha, since it's the US Infantry, I assumed it's something else.

Strb 90 FAC (Sweden) version 1.3.0 released! Changelog Version 1.3.0 Fixed M134 missing textures

Всё хорошо, но про динамическую кампанию - увы, ни слова в новостях.

Hey everyone... I'm almost sure not to be the first to ask, but... any chance to animate the Hold-In-Place-Hooks during closing and opening of the Canopy? Would look awesome! Thanks

Somebody was feeling productive today lol. Thanks for all the updates man!

Maybe wait and actually see for yourself how DLSS is implemented in DCS and what the pros and cons are, instead of working yourself up prematurely and unnecessarily? And, just btw, you don’t need to use it, you know. DLSS is an optional feature.

Well, I struck gold. Now I should be able to see what ED did wrong and how to fix it:

While beauty truly lies in the eye of the beholder, especially in memorials, that object is called "Battle of Ismailia Memorial", and is marked "Ismailia Memorial' on the tourist map. Historically, it honors the fallen from one of the battles during the later stages of the Yom Kippur War in October 1973 that took place on the west bank of the Suez Canal. The object itself is is a gift from North Korea to the people of Egypt, which may account for the somewhat overbearing, if not outright corny, visual style. I find it great that OnReTech go the extra mile to include these landmarks, IMHO it's what differentiates a great map from a merely good one.

Еще раз, задержка в 0.5 сек для долгого нажатия не старый косяк, а особенность реальной авионики. К этому пришли ее разработчики там, это скопировали разработчики тут и честно сказать Ваши претензии, Юрий, уникальны. Раньше подобных жалоб я не припомню от других пользователей. Все вышесказанное в совокупности дает основания считать предмет обсуждения не реальным косяком, а субъективными капризами. А капризы - бывают, штош поделаешь. Провоцировать пламенные обсуждения лучше в темах дискорда, предназначенных для флуда)

I find it always remarkable how negative reviews are seen as 'brutal honest' and positive reviews seen as 'oh well, free product of course'. Why don't I see such negative experiences here on flightsim forums from simmers that actually use them. I mean, 2 sets of the same product and they both fail soo bad. I myself own a Crystal. And yes, I use the Apache head strap and it makes the headset really comfortable to wear. The same head strap I used for wearing the Valve Index for exactly the same reason, comfort. It took me some time to find the sweetspot with the Crystal as it also took with the Index. And no, I don't have the physical condition of a real fighter pilot. But to experience the same problems as in the video? From day one, buying, shipping, installing and updating all went smooth. Followed the Pimax instructions as you do with any other device and I did not get any problem. Do I have remarks about the Crystal. You bet. The software still needs developing. For example, to control the base station so I can switch it to standby when I stop in VR. If you used the Index you will know that you can control this in SteamVR. I want the same option in the Crystal. And yes, I hope that the capacity of customer service will grow. Because they are more then helpful enough but it is not ask & answer in 5 minutes….. If you don't like Pimax and or the Crystal, fair enough. Everybody has his/her opinion. But when it, in my opinion, develops into 'bashing' it has nothing to do anymore in being honest but just being biased. So far, Pimax is delivering what they promised. Not all ready from day one but it is coming. Before you call me a ‘fanboy’, read my other post about my findings with the Crystal and Pimax. Enjoy your headset and VR whatever make it is.

Yeah, just guessing that radio jamming will be the most disabled feature of MP servers of all time. edit: or it will create a new game mode: "Hunt the jammer"

^^^ I can only imagine the bug reports and general outcry from the MP community if comms jamming becomes a thing. "We want realism!!!", wait, not that much realism. It would be nice to have a loitering AI EC-130 just ruining everyone's day though...

There's a war memorial N 30 34' 53", E 32 18' 39" big old AK-47 Bayonet on the muzzle of an AK sticking out of the ground. Wouldn't have seen it except for the slow flight in a Helo.

CH, any plan to add more US navy Ships? I would really love the Constellation class. Furthermore, do you plan to add the Tomahawk Block 5 with anti ship capability? It would also be interesting to see the AGM-179 JAGM which can be quadpacked into the MK41 (as shown below) which would be useful for targets like Boghammers. Overall I love your current ships and cannot wait to see the collection expand.

As far as I know the map is not complete. There will still be two more phases. Currently the map needs a lot of improvements and if it isn't finished I wouldn't buy another map from them.

More like 25% I guess, but whatever. I wanted to spread some positivity not start a fight. I‘m out.

They need to start somewhere, don’t they? Nobody foreclosed the possibility of adding FSR too at some point. That is exactly what I meant by appreciating what you get instead of worrying what you don’t. Half-empty vs. half-full I guess.

I'd like to add to the wish list a version of the Mi8 with the dolphin nose (or whatever it's called) and the ramp door at the rear. It seems like these have been customer options for both domestic Mi8 and export Mi17s, and not necessarily tied to any particular variant of Mi8. So hopefully it could be a visual update to the model, not necessarily requiring any other changes to the variant that we have. Internal cockpit differences might be minimal. Instrument panels could remain as is, as real life mi8s with the nose seem to have simple top cover to span the gap between the two instrument pods. Other than that, blanking out the lower greenhouse windows or covering them with a panel might be all that's needed! I'd even buy a extra mi8 if this came to reality I'd be willing to bet this could give sales a second life as well. So, how about it DCS??? Pretty please??? null edit: new pics for inspiration (and to replace broken links)

Thank you for everything that you do! Also, some photos of the B-21 were published earlier this month. I'll consider making a livery with these new markings when I have time.

The Liveries graphics are not easily editable, as they are optimized for use within the Sim, where they have to be aplied to the aircraft multiple times per second. In contrast, a Template is an editable graphics file, which you can edit as you see fit .. on this particular case they are Adobe Photoshop files, which you can also edit with other graphics softwares besides Photoshop. Correct, when you edit a livery, most of the texture files remain unchanged: textures for damaged parts, decals, transparencies, bump maps, interior textures, etc. So, a custom livery cames with just the textures that have been edited ... all the rest are taken from the default livery of the aircraft. For the B-17, the default textures are inside this ZIP file: The description.lua file is the one that tells DCS which textures have been edited by the livery creator, with that field true/false. Think of this field as the game asking the question, "Should I use the default file?", so true = use the default, false = use the new moded file. Please note that I'm not a skin creator, so I'm not able to help with the photoshop part of creating a livery, but I do understand how the liveries are used by DCS

Rudel teaches us all, along with yourself, Flappie (even on his holidays) and a number of others. Greatly appreciated and lovely to see.

Good shout, I still read conflicting ways to sort them. FWIW Personally, I do as I think Rudel or MaxSenna told me to and put them in the Saved Games folder. Your ‘Option 2’. Those B-17 skins are a real treat eh.

Resources: uscarriers.net (deployment resource) gonavy.jp (deployment resource) seaforces.org anft.net San Diego, CA CVN-71 USS Theodore Roosevelt Went on deployment: VF-14, VF-31, VF-32, VF-41, VF-84, VF-102, VF-213 Spent time on deck: VF-142, VF-143, VF-201, VF-211 CVN-72 USS Abraham Lincoln Went on deployment: VF-31, VF-41, VF-84, VF-114, VF-213 Spent time on deck: VF-32, VF-111, VF-114 Norfolk, Virginia CVN-73 USS George Washington Went on deployment: VF-11, VF-102, VF-103, VF-142, VF-143 CVN-74 USS John C. Stennis Went on deployment: VF-11, VF-14, VF-31, VF-41, VF-143, VF-201, VF-211 Spent time on deck: VF-101. VF-201 CVN-75 USS Harry S. Truman Went on deployment: VF-32, VF-102

That‘s what led me to believe that it is the friction on tarmac that is the root cause of the issue. But in the end we all agree that braking is an issue.

The two most noticable points atm would be more control over how and if a missile goes active (allowing us to correctly do AIM-54C SARH) and better control over the guidance logic. We believe we're close in regards to actual aerodynamic and motor performance but guidance is still somewhat lacking. Having more control over the guidance logic or getting help to tune it would, imho, be the way ahead for more realism. But I also know that's an ongoing discussion with ED. Apart from that being able to launch the missile at a selected point in space instead of being locked to actual targets would also increase accuracy as to how the missile should behave but I'd say it's a lower prio and likely harder to achieve.

Noch ein Hinweis bezüglich der Lastverteilung weg von der GPU zur CPU. Bei mir wird die Arbeitsverteilung in DCS-MT-VR über das OpenXR-Toolkit so eingeblendet: Mit DFR: GPU 17-23 ms CPU: 1-2 ms Mit Quad-Views: GPU: 0.0 ms CPU: 13-15 ms Ich vermute, dieses Szenario liegt nahe am Optimalfall, denn es gibt auch noch einen Fakt, der nicht unerwähnt bleiben sollte. Falls die CPU der limitierende Faktor sein sollte, dürfte Quad-Views keine Verbesserung bringen, sondern könnte sogar noch FPS kosten!

Над моторикой рук надо поработать, оптимизировать то что можно оптимизировать, убрать суету там где она мешает. Система хороша, но не идеальна. А разговор этот лежит в плоскости skill issue.

Hello can u make a assets mod for the Singapore Military! I am especially interested in seeing the Formidable Class Frigates and Victory Class Corvettes in DCS. There are also AFVs and APCs like the Bionix and Hunter AFVs and the Terrex APCs. Will be excited to see those in DCS.

I wonder if there’s any movement on this issue. Is it investigated, is it on a to do list? Internally fixed mayhaps?

Troop transport means ground vehicles or visible infantry on Huey, Hip and Hind?

Agreed. I've always heard DCS was better with Nvidia and that most DCS flyers are Nvidia users, so it makes sense to start improvements in that direction. That's why I upgraded to a 4070. DCS was my only concern when looking at a new card. And honestly, this endless talk about "splitting the community" is tiresome. If we want 100% equality in all things, we'll have to play DCS on an Xbox. And that would be gross.