Hobel

I would have said this is more about the Tgp offset, because the thread creator points out the difference in the first post.

As far as I can tell, 2 things are happening here. Once it is the CEP from the bomb itself. which in some cases goes slightly beyond 5m. and I got similar results in the A10C 2 with the GBU38 when the aiming points were placed perfectly in the ME. Whether it is really due to the height must be tested again more precisely. @TobiasA hint here under 10.000 feet it could rather come to inaccuracies and everything beyond that leads to better CEP The second thing is the F16 TGP offset, If you use it, you get an additional offset, and the bomb can hit far off target (+10m)because of this this 2 things must be tested and assessed independently of each other, even if both are related to each other.

damn I hadn't thought about the height. i tested on flat levels. ME waypoints have always landed in the 5m CEP TGP marked targets mostly missed by a long way. thanks for the tests!

Why don't you test it yourself and then share the results?

That's not the point

it seems to be about 15km

Ah yes that's it, I have not installed the map. General tip, please do all tests on Caucasus as far as possible.

I can download them and also add them to my track folder. But then in dcs nothing is shown to me.

none of these files are shown to me in DCS. can anyone here confirm this?

Ich hoffe sehr das Air to air refuling nächstes jahr eine überarbeitung erfährt oder es zumindest News dazu gibt

ja bitte?

our version? otherwise there are enough other F16s that have at least tested the Aim7. thoretically possible maybe one day, it would give our sanbox even more possibilities

For late cold war scenarios this would be fantastic!

Agree you want to play a mission, dcs crashes and you have to wait again 20min xD +1 for stored PA

Das der diese Radar-gelenkte Bombe bekommt ist schon klasse xD

Depending on the mode, the Gbu24 can go into a lvl flight Like https://youtu.be/bRRXK7QnxaU https://forum.dcs.world/topic/311401-gbu-24-max-range-issue/page/2/#comments

Is it possible that something is also wrong with the datalink/target points? Actually, even with an INS that has a drift, after saving and immediately recalling it, you should return to the same position. But here, too, there is an additional drift that I can't explain. That is good too Thx!

When there is no wind, the AGM154A is very good at destroying an SA-2TR. with wind however from 3-6 m/s the whole thing looks different, but whether that should be so I can not answer but If you know which direction the wind is coming from, you can adjust the TG point.

I'll look at it later Can you upload the mission too please?

okay i tested the whole thing again and seems to have changed something, it behaves now as you say

Является ли такое поведение преднамеренным? В руководстве говорится, что обычно устанавливается QFE, но для того, чтобы Shkval работал в связке с точками ZIel и каналом передачи данных, необходимо установить правильное значение QNH. Потому что если я введу QFE, это не сработает. Поэтому я несколько удивлен поведением спасибо вам за ваши усилия!

Another thing @Volk.@Tuuvas@Frederf@rrasfly2 Can someone explain, help? I start my cold KA50III. Take off and with a clean alignment, as you can see in the video, I create a data link/target point and save it. When I select the target point again, the Shkval swings back to the saved position, not perfect but sufficient for our example. After that I fly for a while to generate a drift. get into position. I select my target point 1 again, as we can see it is strongly drifted. something I think we all expect, the target point 1 drifts as far as the system of the KA50. Now I Slewe the Shkval back to the vehicle and create another target point 2, if I select this immediately afterwards the Shkval has a very strong drift similar to TGP1. but how can this be? the new Datalink Point 2 is saved with the drift from the helicopter, so I should be able to recall the previously saved position without problems? so where does this "extra" drift come from?

I think about it similar to some others, even if the drift is over 1000KM the new target point that I create should have exactly the same drift as my Helicopter, but it is not so and after retrieve this is completely different where.

So if I understand the question correctly, yes, that should work in dcs. Lock a target, fire the aim 120, after firing Los the lock, wait 15-20s and then lock the target again, you can then see how the aim 120 tries to reach the target. This only works with the same target, unfortunately it is not possible to simply switch.

hmm, so with me it already lights up with very very light movements.