Jump to content

Raven (Elysian Angel)

Members
  • Posts

    4243
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

Everything posted by Raven (Elysian Angel)

  1. Then you should have bought the 3 parts separately.
  2. Should it? Or does that switch simply tell the onboard computer which sensor the pilot wants to use and have displayed on the HUD? Which position was the radar switch in: Off/Dummy/Illum?
  3. With FFB and in VR, the oscillations are very intrusive. But yes overall I agree this is easily their best release since the F-18.
  4. Did you clear the FXO and Metashaders2 folder? And while at it, it’s not a bad idea to clear the DirectX shader folder in Windows too. Those are solid first steps to start diagnosing problems…
  5. I hope not...
  6. When you press the Return button, the system automatically switches to Aerodrome 1 yes, but you can manually set it to 2 or 3 by pushing their respective buttons.
  7. I suggest you read through that thread. There have been discussions about it on the Russian forum too, apparently.
  8. What does it matter? Just use flaps up as your “up one level” and either take off flaps or landing flaps as your “down one level”. It doesn’t matter, as they are functionally the same.
  9. There is, sort of. But ED needs to fix that and it has been reported.
  10. No: up until now, that metric/imperial setting only affect the mission editor and F10 map. Our MiG-29 is the first module to also use it.
  11. Works perfectly on my end: I implemented it in one of my own missions yesterday.
  12. With two-seaters the airflow over the nose is vastly different, and the centre of gravity is likely also to be different. Especially MiG-29UB is reported to be very tricky to fly.
  13. He gave you an answer. You just didn't like it
  14. Use Combined Joint Task Forces Red/Blue then: those factions have everything.
  15. ... then you wouldn't call it "MiG-29A 9.12A" since that doesn't exist: an aircraft can't be 9.11 and 9.12A at the same time, especially since 9.11 never materialised and was just an idea abandoned in 1976
  16. Be that as it may, the better our MiG-29's FM reflects the real bird, quirks and oddities included, the more I like it It's quite possible that this specific roll tendency is something that's actually not present in the real aircraft and will be addressed in a future FM update - but if it is, we'll learn to deal with it
  17. Thanks for ninja fixing the MiG-29's visor. Now this functionality is ready to be ported over to other ED modules!
  18. In this thread, yes. On the forum in general: no I’ll clarify: when people post anywhere, and others can see a high counter of “community answers” underneath their name, that indicates that person is either helpful, knowledgeable, or both. Look at it as a ‘reputation’ system, that’s visible to everyone regardless of where on these forums they post something
  19. That’s because there’s a dedicated subforum for controller issues/questions:
  20. Oh, I enabled the mod again after the patch out of habit. I’ll check it out in a moment!
  21. If you're talking about the actual purpose of, yes it is. More so, DCS is intended to be a digital museum - that's coming straight out of the horse's mouth. People can use it for Team Deathmatch and free-for-all, and that is their right. No, only a minority, and probably even a small minority since there's also the mil-sim community with their own squadrons that only fly on their own server. But those people don't make clickbait youtube videos so they'll get much less exposure from the general public.
×
×
  • Create New...