Leaderboard

We really cant win, people demand news about stuff we give them news then they don't want news until its ready. There is no pleasing everyone, but we try. We will not give out dates until its closer, so we didnt. We wanted to share progress news so we did.

It will very much depend on testing, but we will let you know in future updates. thanks

Just to avoid any confusion about FPS. I Read something about the Main-Rotor is much too high poly Please keep in mind that that effect results in baking the High-Poly mesh on the Low Poly one. It may look like killing FPSs, but that's just a game on tricking the eyes. The Normal Maps are overriding the hard edges

02 декабря 2022 года Дорогие друзья, Подходит к концу наша текущая распродажа DCS World Autumn Sale 2022. Остается всего два дня, когда вы можете воспользоваться предоставленными скидками и сэкономить до 50% при покупке летательных аппаратов, карт и кампаний. Предложение актуально до конца суток 4 декабря по Гринвичу. Игровой движок DCS осуществляет большинство самых тяжелых вычислений в пределах одного процессорного ядра и нашим следующим шагом станет поддержка многопоточности, которая находится в хорошей стадии готовности. Проделанные работы уже потребовали значительных изменений в архитектуре игрового кода и улучшат производительность, которая наиболее сильно будет заметна в сетевых баталиях и в сложных миссиях с большим количеством юнитов. Читайте подробности ниже. Игровая межсквадовая лига SATAL (Squadron Air-to-Air League) в рамках DCS World Events организует очередное состязания по правилам PvP (игрок против игрока). Подавайте заявки на участие и смотрите SATAL 2023 video. Благодарим за участие и всемерную поддержку. Искренне Ваши, Команда Игл Дайнемикс Последние скидки осени Ещё есть шанс Не пропустите распродажу уходящей осени 2022. Она закончится в 02 часа 59 минут в ночь с 4 по 5 декабря по Москве. Если вы еще не в курсе, то самое время ознакомиться с видеоматериалом и посетить наш электронный магазин. Многопоточность Отчёт о разработке На сегодняшний день игровой движок DCS выполняется в одном потоке и только звуковая система может считаться на другом ядре. В большинстве случаев это не было проблемой, так как основная нагрузка по визуализации лежит на видеокарте, точнее на её графическом процессоре (GPU), который и выполняет большую часть этой работы. Поэтому FPS в основном ограничивался именно производительностью GPU, а не возможностями центрального процессора (ЦП). По мере развития DCS развивались и графические процессоры. Они становились мощнее и быстрее, в то время как производительность одного ядра ЦП практически не менялась. Производители процессоров шли по пути увеличения количества ядер, а не их тактовой частоты. Как следствие, возросшие требования DCS стали упираться в производительность достижимую в пределах одного ядра ЦП. Параллельно с ростом графики в DCS World совершенствуются летательные аппараты, оружие, другая боевая техника, моделирование которой целиком реализуется на ЦП и это ещё более усугубляет проблему. Для повышения эффективности использования ресурсов процессора мы переработали программное ядро нашего движка. Во-первых, на архитектурном уровне все вычисления были разделены на два основных потока: графический и логический. Это открывает новые возможности для дальнейшего распараллеливания вычислений в потоках – как в логической, так и в графической части движка независимо друг от друга. Во-вторых, для удовлетворения требований масштабируемости для многопоточности и потребностей современных графических API, часть графического движка была значительно усовершенствована, и более того, многие подсистемы были обновлены или написаны с нуля. Внутреннее тестирование уже началось, и мы планируем выпустить обновлённый графический движок DCS (EDGE) в следующем году. Первоначальный выпуск версии с поддержкой многопоточности будет содержать переработанный движок, включая всю подготовку данных графического фрейма для GPU и разделение графической и логической подсистем на два независимых потока. Следует также отметить, что улучшение производительности будет заметно в насыщенных миссиях на загруженных серверах, где количество юнитов обычно намного выше чем в однопользовательской игре. Ожидается улучшение производительности VR, особенно в больших миссиях. Следите за дальнейшими выпусками новостей. SATAL 2023 Предварительная запись DCS Events SATAL23. Победа за самыми стойкими. Приготовьтесь к участию в длительных и интересных соревнованиях, рассчитанных на 4 месяца и 4 этапа. По три матча на каждую команду и на каждый этап. Каждый следующий этап будет сложнее предыдущего как с точки зрения ландшафта (гористость) и времени суток, так и с точки зрения ограничений на доступное вооружение и постепенное сужение доступной зоны ведения боевых действий. Каждый матч будет рассчитан на одночасовой вылет. Все вылеты будут происходить на карте Кавказа. Старт первого этапа назначен на середину – конец января 2023 года. По завершении 4 этапов, 16 лучших команд перейдут в финальный этап – Чемпионский плей-офф. Победители финального этапа получат титул победителя DCS PvP Competitive Community. Регистрация на участие в SATAL23 4x4 уже началась и продлится до окончания суток 14 декабря 2022 года по Гринвичу. Читайте подробности и правила на форуме SATAL23 Survivor Series и присоединяйтесь к сообществу на канале DCS Events Discord. Искренне с Вами,

DCS Newsletter discussion 2nd December 2022 - DCS 2.8 Multithreading | SATAL 2023

Now that was an interesting update let's hope "next year" means early next year.

Yes, hence why the maxim of "everything is subject to change" is bandied about with such frequency in these circles. And a few have disappeared, but those what disappear usually have dozens of red flags or never get the sign off by ED to begin with. Plus, if they never come out? You didn't part with money for it. I mean, unless you pre-ordered the P-40F from VEAO. Sympathies if that is the case. But, I fail to see how that's relevant in regards to the F-4 Phantom by Heatblur. We're talking about a developer who has multiple releases. Delays happen, they honestly do. As I said, never believe in a release window unless it's pretty specific instead of something as vague as a year. Why they haven't made a statement about it, yet? I can't say. Probably because it'd just confirm what we already know, really. At any rate, I'd rather F-4E drop in 2023 than get another F-16 release debacle.

It's a millimetre wave radar which, without getting too technical, means it has much higher resolution than a typical airborne radar, but also shorter range. To identify targets such radars are using a database of return signatures of certain vehicle types, and matching target returns against that. Most such databases would use key features the radar could pick out, such a gun barrels, the outline/profile of the vehicle, tracks, etc The range of the version we are getting should be 8km.

I asked my brother about this, who has around 500hrs on the Viper and this was his reply. "The real F-16 has no adverse aileron yaw worth mentioning in any symmetrical configuration. It has a computer specifically designed to keep the pointy end forward, and it does it quite well. It should roll around the velocity vector and the FLCS should do everything needed to keep the ball centered while it's doing it. While the FLCS does function differently in landing gains the ARI is still functional and should null all unwanted yaw and/or sideslip." Please bring this up to your SMEs.

The waiting should be over very soon.

You can’t please everyone but I am sure many (like me) are very happy to get such updates. Moving into internal testing is a significant project milestone and well worth communicating IMHO.

From Polychop Discord

This is what exactly everyone needed

Exactly this. Such a major change will need thorough testing and I wouldn't be too surprised, if it takes a couple iterations in Openbeta to go through that transition. We need to manage our expectations. Fingers crossed. It is definitely a major change to a better ressource usage, but at the same time a massive change to the core of DCS. Looking forward to this, though. It is the way DCS needs to go and keep up with the hardware. Thanks for the info and heads up.

Еще до трекиров - играл в авиасимуляторы, в т.ч. фланкер, с обзором хаткой. Потом появился трекир, первый еще, и я его конечно купил, и играл с трекиром. Потом был у меня был третий трекир, потом пятый, а потом VR в виде Quest 2, которому (и моему опыту полетов в DCS в VR) уже примерно 2 года. Так вот, на днях, пребывая в унынии от в очередной раз просевшего фпс в DCS, связанному с очередным обновлением графики, усадившим на жопу мою 3080 ti, я достал трекир, подключил, быстро вспомнил как это настраивается. Чуть менее быстро вспомнил как правильно водить жалом и косить глазами на монитор ))) И пару дней наслаждался идеальной плавностью игры на максимальных настройках и кристальной четкостью картинки. Однако одновременно до меня доходила и разница, на контрасте, так сказать. Через 2 дня я понял, что нътъ, курить я буду, но пить не брошу, пока VR работает хотя бы так, как он работает, трекир мне не надо. Однако, если что случится, в трекир тоже можно. Но не хочется.

DCS WORLD: KA-50 Black Shark 3 || IGLA Air to Air Missile In this DCS world video we will be taking a look at the Igla Air to Air missile for the KA-50 Black Shark 3 which is releasing soon!

I hear you. I really, really enjoy the Jeff and also wonder why more don’t give it a shot. The goal for the real Jf-17 was for a much less expensive replacement to the F-16 that roughly mimic’s the Falcon’s performance and capabilities. They succeeded. Ultimately it’s less capable than a modern F-16, but keep in mind the Falcon has been steadily developed since the 1970’s. I think the capability/performance deficiencies compared to the Falcon are on the margins, particularly for our game. I ‘argue’ the Jeff is one of the most complete, polished fully released jet modules out there, if not the most complete. I have a lot of fun with it and find it’s quirks part of its personality. It’s not for everyone, but I love it.

Can this be elaborated on? Specifically, the bolded part, does this mean it's not true multithreaded physics and rendering? This statement implies all you did was to split off rendering and physics onto their own threads, with both systems remaining serialized and bound to a single core, just now independent of one another. This is progress, but much less than I hoped for, especially after such a long time. Now, I know even this is a big job starting out from thoroughly singlethreaded code, but DCS can't afford to stop there. Modern CPUs have 8 cores to work with, top end ones have 16 and even my ancient 4770 has four. That won't make DCS use 100% of my CPU, just 50% instead of 25%, possibly a bit more if the thread where everything else sits starts doing stuff. In 2023, it's not enough. Three threads (four if you count audio, which really isn't any kind of bottleneck) is only acceptable as a stepping stone toward a truly scalable, parallelized architecture. The reason is, physics dictate that without extreme cooling solutions or a technological revolution on par with invention of the microchip, single core CPU performance will not significantly improve (unless water cooling becomes standard, without OC they likely won't breach 6GHz). Any further visual improvements will degrade performance, as will the advance of display technology, unless advantage can be taken of a rising number of cores. So this is a must.

Well, we'll certainly stay tuned for updates. Thanks.

It is not. Adding it now

I've found the conflict, it was with the NavyEquipment Mod. All working fine and dandy now, thanks.

Get the best VR HMD that you can afford. You want one that is capable of the highest possible native resolution your money can buy because you can always "de-tune" the graphics settings to match your hardware. If you get one with a lower native resolution, you end up having to use more and more supersampling to make it look decent, and the whole supersampling process is the biggest performance killer for any headset/GPU/CPU combination.

This is about a month old, but interesting info from RAZBAM's discord, and not yet posted here. A/A Radar detecting civilian traffic while operating in MPRF with a "LO GMTR" setting. (Pilot selected, smaller doppler notch filter I believe..?) null

Fun fact, the APG-73 was given a lot more processing (and room for more processor cards) than needed in order to support a future swap to an AESA that would replace the APG-65 planer slotted waveguide array that was still utilized by the APG-73. (ie the AESA upgrade would only swap out the antenna and still use the radar processing from the APG-73) Though the Navy never did upgrade the F/A-18Cs with a 'front-end' AESA. Instead, the Super Hornets got the fully kitted APG-79 AESA.

Nb. that DCS also doesn't model the change in Isp based on atmospheric pressure at all. While a typical missile has a nozzle that's optimized for low altitudes (and thus with a relatively low spread between the sea level ISP and the vacuum ISP), there's still probably a 7% or so difference between a sea level shot and a 35k foot shot that Heatblur can't do anything about, with the difference being a bit more for a higher shot, if we use other SL-optimized solid rocket motors with similar propellant chemistry and known characteristics as a model. I'm guessing the Isp used in the in-game model is correct for intermediate altitudes, causing the thrust to be slightly higher than it should be for the portion of the motor burn that occurse down low and slightly lower than it should be way up high, bounding the worst-case error, but I'm obviously not privy to that. Another oddity: do the Mk47 Mod 0 and Mk47 Mod 1 really have the same Isp and total impulse despite having different propellant chemistry? The whitepaper (I know, I know, it's "no longer operative" and whatnot) claimed the Mod 1 had a higher Isp and thrust, the previous in-game model had the Mod 1 with *lower* Isp and thrust, the current in-game model has the Mod 1 and Mod 0 with the same Isp and thrust (unless I'm missing something in the files, in which case please correct me). It's probably a marginal difference, but it seems really odd that a change to a propellant with a different energy density wouldn't change the total impulse.

All, I redid the sketch from scratch today, starting with a blank sketch and copying across code from working sketches and then splicing in the relevant DSC Bios lines. It works, so all I can surmise is that there is something corrupted in the original sketch. I had a similar issue with an altimeter sketch a few days ago, where it just stopped working. Luckily the code was copied in notepad++ so I used that as a backup. However no matter how hard I looked I couldn't see what the difference between the two sketches were. It also reminded me of when RS485 stopped working, and it turned out it was a glitch with the Arduino IDE So, a couple of lessons learnt, 1) back up any working sketches, and 2) just because you can't see anything wrong with the sketch doesn't mean that you shouldn't suspect it! Hope this helps someone Les

If that doesn't get the job done, hit the voice message inhibit to your right, it'll lower her SPL quite a lot! It's safety-wired though, so you might need to explain that to the maintenance guys...

Maybe they requested a library of PRF tones from LockMart or commissioned someone specialised in something like that to make PRF tones, and they have to wait.

Others might have also seen this: https://forum.dcs.world/topic/304804-official-news-2022/?do=findComment&comment=5065349

Since it hasn't been fixed yet, I wonder if there is a way to get rid of those clouds. Not all of them behave like this. I'm flying an excellent and stunningly beautiful campaign. Those shimmering clouds are impossible to ignore. -Ruining a huge part of the experience, and reducing the value of my investments significantly. (Fanbois will fan)

Dear ED when will see implementation of wet runway surfaces to correlate with rain. The renditions of rain on runway surfaces in MSFS is very impressive. The Supercarriers decks looks excellent in rain so when can we expect the same implementation to general runway/paved surfaces? BTW fantastic V2.8 many thanks

Yes. That's good. But my point is that 'mission1.miz' as the file name shouldn't be in the 'File name:' dialog box, because the mission editor gave you a new mission file name when you created the new mission. It's THAT NEW NAME that should be inside that box, not the name of the mission file you had PREVIOUSLY loaded before you created a new mission. I agree the location of the save dialog should be the same, but not putting in the wrong name in the File name: box.

ASC: C-130J Check Six Media DCS: Top End Australia develop pics:

Yes, there is a solution for this. My controller was working with independent axis on the triggers since the day I bought it. Then one day, it all of a sudden went to a single "split axis" setup after a Windows Update or something. After doing much research, I found the answer... https://www.reddit.com/r/xbox/comments/qer8pv/xbox_controller_right_and_left_trigger_merged/ The old HID driver for the controller was 2-axis, then Microsoft pushed an updated XINPUT driver that changed the behavior of the triggers to be a single split-axis. You need to reinstall the driver for the controller from Device Manager, and when picking from the list, select the old "HID-compliant Game Controller" driver. Then you can map them as different functions with Joystick Gremlin, etc.

Its not being "Pessimism for the sake of pessimism". There is a track record of this happening on DCS over the years...How many aircraft have been in development with promises of a soon release that just vanish and are never seen or heard from again? And just because HB seems to be more together than some developers dose not make them immune from such things...I truly hope that it is released soon and maybe it will be .However, I see zero evidence that is the case and even at the start of when they made the announcement nearly a year ago there was nothing to show where things stood or at what stage things were at. I understand world events did throw a huge wrench in their plans if indeed their 2022 release date was truly a real thing but making expectations and then leaving people in the dark is not the way I would do things....Thats just the way I see it any time now in the next few weeks we will hopefully know one way or the other. If they hold to their word about at least making a official statement.

Hello Suke, It is what i mean: they aren't effective at all ( or very poorly) against armored vehicules ( of course it is pretty normal against heavy ones). MK20 should be more effective .

Hi @BIGNEWY It's difficult to find direct proper evidence, but I actually got some info that might be useful. In the TAC-000 Harrier manual, which share many commonalities with the Hornet avionics, it explains in detail what happen when STEP is pressed. The Maverick circuitry is reset and the camera is boresighted, cancelling any lock that the missile may have at that point. This is the current behavior of our hornet, so I would lend to think that current implementation is right and the F-16 may have some additional circuitry in the store management system to keep two missiles locked at the same time. In fact, the manual also adds that the QTY value has no effect, and the missile can only be launched single Best regards

Yes, it's 95 percent single player with pause.

Watched the flights linking up with tankers over my house in the West Country of England on their way out - was almost continuous rumbling for nearly an hour.

Might be off topic, but I didnt think the Phantom ever had a Launchbar. I thought it had a Bridal system for its entire life. I could be wrong for the S/N as my knowledge of them is limited. The E is missing those Bridal connection points. But for the sake of the game and implementation I dont see a problem with a stand in "Carrier Launch System" that just makes it compatible with existing carriers, but I dont think that would be a critical path to release.

25. November 2022 Liebe Piloten, Partner und Freunde! Wir freuen uns, den Herbst-Sale 2022 anzukündigen, der bis zum 4. Dezember um 23:59 Uhr GMT laufen wird. Wir nehmen auch am Herbst-Sale auf Steam teil! Schaut in unserem E-Shop für Details. WINWING hat die Hauptinstrumentenbrett-Geräte für die DCS: F/A-18C HornetHornet angekündigt. Dieses ausgeklügelte Set von Cockpit-Instrumenten und -Bedienelementen ist ziemlich einzigartig und eine fantastische Ergänzung für alle, die ihre F/A-18C-Cockpits verbessern wollen. Wir bieten auch native Steuerungsprofile für diese Hardware und andere Winwing-Bedienlemente an. Seht euch das Video zur MIP-Serie an. Wenn ihr nach einer freundlichen und zwanglosen Atmosphäre sucht, um eure Fähigkeiten in DCS zu verbessern, dann empfehlen wir euch, den Tactical DCS Discord-Server zu besuchen. Dort werden auch Schulungen angeboten und regelmäßig Events veranstaltet, um eure Fähigkeiten zu testen. Vielen Dank für eure Leidenschaft und Unterstützung. Viele Grüße, Eagle Dynamics Herbst-Sale 2022 Spezielle Angebote Der Herbst-Sale 2022 lädt euch ein, bei den meisten unserer Luftfahrzeuge, Karten und Kampagnen kräftig zu sparen. Der Verkauf läuft bis zum 4. Dezember um 23:59 Uhr GMT in unserem E-Shop. Wir nehmen auch am Herbst-Sale auf Steam teil. Flugzeuge mit einem Nachlass von 50 % DCS: A-10A Warthog DCS: A-10C II Tank Killer DCS: AJS-37 Viggen DCS: AV-8B Night Attack V/STOL DCS: Bf 109 K-4 Kurfurst DCS: C-101 Aviojet DCS: Christen Eagle II DCS: F-15C Eagle DCS: F-5E Tiger II DCS: F-86F Sabre DCS: Flaming Cliffs 3 DCS: Fw 190 A-8 DCS: Fw 190 D-9 Dora DCS: I-16 DCS: L-39 Albatros DCS: M-2000C DCS: MiG-15bis DCS: MiG-19P Farmer DCS: MiG-21bis DCS: MiG-29 DCS: P-47D Thunderbolt DCS: P-51D Mustang DCS: Spitfire LF Mk. IX DCS: Su-25 DCS: Su-27 Flanker DCS: Su-33 DCS: Yak-52 Flugzeuge mit 30 % Nachlass DCS: F-16C Viper DCS: F/A-18C Hornet DCS: JF-17 Thunder DCS: Mosquito Flugzeuge mit 25 % Nachlass DCS: F-14 Tomcat Hubschrauber mit 50 % Nachlass DCS: Mi-8MTV2 Magnificent Eight DCS: SA342 Gazelle DCS: UH-1H Huey Hubschrauber mit 30 % Nachlass DCS: Mi-24P Hind Karten mit 50 % Nachlass DCS: Normandy DCS: Syria DCS: Channel DCS: Nevada DCS: Persian Gulf Andere Module mit 50 % Nachlass DCS: Combined Arms DCS: NS 430 Navigation System DCS: NS 430 Navigation System for C-101EB DCS: NS 430 Navigation System for C-101СС DCS: NS 430 Navigation System for L-39С Cockpit DCS: NS 430 Navigation System for Mi-8MTV2 Cockpit DCS: WWII Assets Pack Andere Module mit 30 % Nachlass DCS: Supercarrier Kampagnen mit 50 % Nachlass DCS: A-10C 16-2 Red Flag Campaign DCS: A-10C Advanced Aircraft Training Qualification Campaign DCS: A-10C Basic Flight Training Campaign DCS: A-10C Iron Flag Part 1 Campaign DCS: A-10C Operation Persian Freedom Campaign DCS: A-10C Stone Shield Campaign DCS: A-10C Tactical Training Qualification Campaign DCS: AV-8B Hormuz Freedom Campaign DCS: Black Shark 2 Republic Campaign DCS: Combined Arms: Frontlines Georgia Campaign DCS: F-14B Operation Sandworm DCS: F-15C 16-2 Red Flag Campaign DCS: F-15C Aggressors BFM Campaign DCS: F-15C The Georgian War Сampaign DCS: F-16C Red Flag 21-1 Campaign DCS: F-5E Aggressors Air Combat Maneuver Campaign DCS: F-5E Aggressors Basic Fighter Maneuvers Campaign DCS: F-5E Black Sea Resolve '79 Campaign DCS: F/A-18C Aggressors BFM Campaign DCS: F/A-18C Hornet - The Serpent's Head 2 Campaign DCS: F/A-18C Operation Pontus Campaign DCS: F/A-18C Raven One Сampaign DCS: F/A-18C Rising Squall Campaign DCS: Ka-50 2 Pandemic Campaign DCS: L-39 Albatros: Kursant Campaign DCS: M-2000C Red Flag Campaign DCS: Mi-8MTV2 and Ka-50: Memory of a Hero Campaign DCS: Mi-8MTV2 Oilfield Campaign DCS: Mi-8MTV2 The Border Campaign DCS: Mig-21bis Battle of Krasnodar Campaign DCS: Mig-21bis Constant Peg DCS: P-51D Charnwood Campaign DCS: P-51D High Stakes Campaign DCS: Spitfire LF Mk. IX Operation Epsom Campaign DCS: Su-27 The Ultimate Argument Campaign DCS: The Enemy Within 3.0 Campaign DCS: The Museum Relic Campaign DCS: UH-1H Argo Campaign DCS: UH-1H Worlds Apart - Spring 2025 Campaign Kampagnen mit 30 % Rabatt DCS: A-10C Operation Agile Spear DCS: AV-8B Sky Warrior Campaign DCS: F/A-18C Operation Cerberus North Kampagnen mit 25 % Rabatt DCS: Bf 109 K-4 Jagdflieger Campaign DCS: F-14A Fear the Bones Campaign DCS: F-14A Zone 5 Campaign DCS: F-86F Hunters over the Yalu Campaign DCS: F/A-18C Persian Lion Campaign DCS: F/A-18C Raven One: Dominant Fury Campaign DCS: Fw 190 A-8 Horrido! Campaign DCS: P-47D Wolfpack Campaign DCS: P-51D: The Blue Nosed Bastards of Bodney Campaign DCS: Spitfire Beware! Beware! DCS: Spitfire IX The Big Show Campaign DCS: UH-1 Paradise Lost WINWING Hauptinstrumentenbrett WINWING hat eine hochentwickelte Produktkategorie namens MAIN INSTRUMENT PANEL (MIP) für DCS: F/A-18C Hornet herausgebracht. Sie haben die Original-Panels einer alten F/A-18C Hornet simuliert, die den Upfront-Controller, das HUD-Bedienfeld und drei Displays mit funktionierenden Bildschirmen umfasst, die mit den Cockpit-Displays in DCS World integriert werden können. Dank standardisierter Herstellungsverfahren ist das MIP eine exakte Nachbildung der Panels einer Hornet mit präzisen Materialien in Industriequalität und hochgenauer Formgebung. Für virtuelle Piloten mit besonderen Anforderungen bietet WINWING kreative Funktionen wie: verdeckte Wippschalter, modale Multifunktionstasten, 9X9-Tastenanordnung und verschiedene erweiterbare Tastendesigns, die zahlreiche Konfigurationen ermöglichen. Das MIP ist modular aufgebaut und kann mit anderen WINWING-Bedienelementen frei kombiniert werden. Darüber hinaus bietet die SIMAPP-Software visuelle Konfigurationen. Schaut euch die WINWING-MIP-F/A-18C-Serie an. Tactical DCS Mehrspielergemeinschaft Für die Tactical-DCS-Gemeinschaft gibt es keine Teilnahmebedingungen, keine Gebühren und keine zeitlichen Verpflichtungen. Die Mentoren und Ausbilder stehen zur Verfügung, um euch in allen offiziellen DCS-Modulen und den damit verbundenen Fertigkeiten zu unterrichten. Sie veranstalten regelmäßig Events, um eure Fähigkeiten in einer stressfreien Umgebung zu üben. Egal, ob ihr lernen oder lehren wollt, schaut euch Tactical DCS an. Abermals vielen Dank für eure Leidenschaft und Unterstützung. Viele Grüße, Eagle Dynamics

The issue has been reported for this utility and others. Thanks for letting us know too.

I am a pilot...

After quite a bit of trial and error and getting some feedback from a real Hornet pilot in our group here is what I run for the TM Warthog. 0-6-19-25-35-43-57-67-80-90-100 0 Deadzone, 100 saturation for both, 0 Curvature, and only User Curve checked... This works pretty great with the current build of the Hornet I also highly recommend this part!!!:https://www.shapeways.com/product/3MJPNE2SV/warthog-throttle-part-afterburner-detent?productConfiguration=63799442&etId=186650009&utm_source=automated-contact&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=order-shipped&utm_content=2 Most of our guys are using it and it is awesome. Allows you to push through to go into AB and not lift...if your looking for a good curve for the Warthog give this one a try and let me know how it treats you;)

Yes, that was changed some time ago. I belive arround a year ago.