Leaderboard

Getting closer... added the darker grey Ka-52K livery.

Good Afternoon everyone. Happy Thanksgiving to those who celebrate it. I would like to thank you all for your support and kind words. It means a lot. It shows you are human. We all go through something that slows us down in life but it's up to all of us to push through it and keep moving. I am recovering slowly. It has really been a long year and it's not over yet. I am feeling much better but I'm still bothered by pain here in there. Hopefully, in a few weeks, I will be back up and running at full steam again. To keep my mind occupied I worked on the HMS Richmond. I think she is 99% finished. Thanks to CH, Eddie, Toan, and Marroux for the testing and giving me advice. Teamwork makes the dream work. This model was actually made for printing I think but I made it work. It does what it should in DCS. I have created three Liveries for the UK and Chile. Stay Tuned!

More weapons are being implemented and payloads are becoming richer these days, but I have a hard time selecting what I want from the F-15E payload screen. Currently, all guided and unguided bombs are classified in the Bomb category, but I would like to see this classified into categories such as guided and unguided bombs to make it easier to see. The more categories there are, the easier it will be to see and understand.

Thanks! Unfortunately not, let's hope they get it done in the next patch. Send me the question on Discord, it's easier to chat there. Thank you! If a suitable model turn up my plan is to make the Type 31. Much appreciated! Thanks, I'll take a look.

Товарищи "мажоры"Если вы хотите спонсировать ED донатами-пожалуйста,но не надо додумывать за всех.Я и многие другие не готовы постоянно вкладывать в симулятор,который и так требует постоянных финансовых вложений.Порог вхождения и так очень дорогой стал.Раньше каждый студент мог себе позволить поиграть,а сейчас только дети нефтяников.

@-Rudel- M3 Portail pics

DCS's price model is fine as it is, we don't need to start down the path of overpriced and ridiculous microDLC.

Are you now intentionally being thick? If the changelog says the manual is updated, yet the manual contains old date, isn't is valid to be concerned about it?

As everyone else has said, and as you well know by now, 'by the end of the year' has changed to 'Winter'. Obviously, that means it may or may not come this year. The way you're repeating yourself and now shifting ground, this looks like trolling to me. Take what I and everyone else who has responded has said, or don't, but either way your question has been answered repeatedly.

2. /SG.10 and some roughmat tweaks and underside elevater fix

For those that don't know (and I didn't until seeing a Varjo/dcs-world Discord post from mbucchia), Don (dburne) posted a "Farewell" in the "chit-chat" forum here on October 29th, and here he was, riddled with cancer, trying to help someone on 10/31.. He passed on November 10, just 10 days later. RIP Don, you have helped/touched many people..

Hi, I wanted to address @Aplion concern on the lack of information on DCS modding of ships and went ahead and published an article on getting the P 4 Torpedo Boat into DCS. The article is on mudspike, I hope it's ok to link to another site from here: https://forums.mudspike.com/t/how-to-get-a-boat-into-dcs/15854 Cheers, TeTeT

With all due respect, since the "date modified" on this file has changed to today, that implies it was changed in todays update. The OP likely wants to know if the date on it is a typo and there is something new in it before they waste their time looking through it for changes. Not sure why you feel that isn't a valid question.

^^^^This is the way. Find the attitude plus power for the landing configuration for level, the 180 to 90 turn, and final. Then it is a matter of constant adjustments around this values. It’s supposed to be difficult. If I haven’t flown in awhile, it will take at least 5-10 passes to recalibrate the required inputs and corrections. Before attempting a new carrier session, I always begin by practicing level turns, the break maneuver and extended pattern maneuvering until I can consistently make the aircraft do what it needs to do.

The Elapsed Timer hand is missing, and the timer button on the bezel has no function, should be stop/reset/start. The seconds hand should be used by the timer and not the main clock. You can also check how it's done in other USAF aircraft in DCS, F-86, F-5, F-14 and F-16 have it modelled correctly.

Thanks for the info!

We are happy with what we are doing right now, and we also do not need to discuss a different company/game here. Thanks.

Hello everyone, here is a new update, bringing new features and bugfixes: Added a settings page where you can change various options Option to select crosshair color Option to disable program being always on top Added ability to make button inputs slower, in case waypoints are not entered correctly Fixed issue with Ka-50 Ability to select waypoints in spectator mode Download here Make sure to also update your TheWay.lua file with the new one! I'd also like to thank everyone for reaching over 20K downloads of the program!

Something like this. Given that this is about 5 or 6 times the size of the current extents of the Normandy 2 map, might be a while yet...

When I can only fully agree with Sharpe, you know something has gone wrong And no, it wouldn't really make sense to have them create a vastly more complex game that can use pretty much none of the previous parts, and then give that away for free in the vain hope that anyone cares about not flying their planes their flying-planes game. Lol SC.

Any chance CH, that you could do an Iran Livery?

Suddenly, after 2 months and a couple of Microsoft, NVIDIA and DCS updates its working again. No more graphic related crashes. After simming with highest settings and turning of PC. DCS runs flawless again withhout grapic related crash. Thanks for all your support.

We will check edit: it’s an iterative update, not the most up to date manual. The team will include the latest German manual once it has been translated and then the date will be changed to reflect the latest manual. Folks please lets not squabble over the small stuff. thanks

In NAV mode, you can select any FCR mode (CRM, ACM, GMT, GM, SEA) and CRM submodes (RWS, TWS, VSR) and if you leave NAV and go back, it keeps the same mode and submode you had selected. In AA or MSL Override modes, the same happens for both the FCR mode (you can select only CRM or ACM) and submodes - if you leave and go back to AA or MSL Override, it retains the mode you had selected. The same does not happen in AG mode - it always reset back to GM, even though you had GMT or SEA selected. This doesn't make sense from the overall ergonomics of the jet. Note that it always resets to AGR (air-ground ranging) when a visual submode of munitions is selected, and this is correct. However if a pre-planned submode of munitions is selected, it should retain whatever ground mapping mode it had before (either GM, GMT or SEA). Track attached. F16 does not persist AG radar mode.trk

I will try to find some time to look at it. I know that there was some problems with compatibility between 2.9.1 and Moose (which I'm using), so maybe it's related to that.

Let me tell you a little more about Debden Eagles, my upcoming DCS P-51D Campaign

Ну да, недавно один мажор, который пишет сейчас эти строки, столкнулся с необходимостью сделать не самый глобальный, но необходимый ремонт в небольшой 2-комнатной квартире. Это, конечно, не выложить стены видеокартами, но знаете, сопоставимо. А удовлетворения от результата и вполовину не будет )))

And it shouldn't. VOR and TACAN radials are oriented to magnetic north. No HSI in real life behaves like that.

The Marines weren't flying for Iran. F-4E's were. So it would be ridiculous for the Iranian Air Force to be flying Marine planes, which is exactly what would happen if the only flyables version of the F-4 Phantom was the Navy variant.

This has become apparent. However no need, most of us understand it and approve of the choice, and are also looking forward to the naval variant. Again, that's your personal preference filter at work, no offense intended. Who really knows why they chose the most widely used, most produced, most iconic version? Again, most of use get it. I also have every confidence that you will be happy camper sooner than you're imagining. Have a great weekend.

IMHO, A Honor flight should be set up in his memory. All may participate. And have a missing man formation, in full colors. Flown by his closest friends. ED could make this a event. Record the event, and send a copy to his family. This not only honors his memory and contribution to this community, but would show his family what DCS, and this community really meant to him. I would hope it may help the healing to begin. Kind words and deeds are healing in times of sorrow. I know from direct experience having lost two brothers in a short period of time. Don needs not DCS any longer. He has been set free to fly upon the wings of LOVE. Rest easy RIP

человек спросил, как обойтись без гуглового аутентификатора ? это - альтернатива. к чему эти течения мыслей про безопасность и во что я верю, а во что нет ?

See the Google Drive link in the initial post. This is the solution for the time being. I do have a Mirage F1 plan but it won't be until CTS 3.0. I'm at the stack limit of what TARGET will allow, and to add more I need to completely revamp the system. I do have a plan for this, but I just need the time to implement it.

Yes but if you play particular multiplayer servers, you can't join unless you use the up-to-date version of open beta. Main reason I posted is that there have been a couple of updates since this bug appeared and nothing has changed on the Viggen. I agree, after 6 years, it really should get some priority and be finished within the realms of the current game version. Clearly ED making changes can break things, but to be in 'early access' since 2017, without any end in sight - its a bit frustrating - what else is in the pipeline for this module, I read about new sounds, new effects, new textures - I've lost track of wether these have been implemented. As far as I am aware, not implemented. At least two updates since this bug appeared - I've been patient, it's been out 6 years and is still in early access and things are mentioned, but never delivered - new sounds, new textures - but never much in the way of progress any more. It feels like the ugly child, unloved and uncared for , while the new baby (F-14) gets all the toys, and the new pregnancy (F-4) gets all the attention.

I think you should consider the possible preferences of people outside the US a bit more, because for me, living in Europe for example, the Navy Phantoms are a very distant thing. I have never seen one, not even in a museum. I'm quite certain, more people have some kind of a memory or connection to the F-4E worldwide, than any other version, simply because that was exported all around the world. The Navy Phantoms are also cool, I'll buy that module as well, 100%, but HB has made a sound decision bringing the E first. Honestly, we should all just be very happy, that these cold war legends finally start to show up in DCS. F-4, F-104, MiG-23, F-100, Kfir, etc. whichever version, I don't care, I'll buy them all!

Мажоры это те у кого VR и RTX4090 "Но у нас таких нет, у нас все нормальные ребята"

Я немного про другое . Конкретно про "Бренды" Каждый по своему хорош в чем то. Но вот чтобы все было хорошо - умеют далеко лишь не все. ЕД - может.

Hi, I will mention it to the team, but we can not test with user mods so it maybe difficult. Hopefully the future addition will help thank you

The Ka-52K now sits lower on the landing gear, it has the two pylon stub wings which it folds backwards as it should.

Without breaking our own rules about politics, the world is a very unstable place these days and every step must be carefully planned. I believe we will have a FF MiG-29 its a matter of when not if.

At the moment we have a very 1990's spec F-15E and we are working our way towards a 2005-ish spec for CTU-1, Things will be added as we go along and I am sure that the MIDS/Link-16 DL will be added sometime in the future. You have to remember that in real operations, Fighters are never really alone and will have AWACS and GCI support to help with target ID, and SA. In DCS we don't have dedicated controllers 100% of the time which does decrease SA but its not something that can't be overcome.

I basically love the current forum. It's fast, good looking, has useful features, and besides insisting on sending users to a 3rd party software on mobile, it's also fairly mobile friendly once that insistence has been actively denied. But am I the only one to find the search function to be really bad? I just searched for an old post of mine: "Tutorial: Introduction to Lua scripting". Using that as a search term doesn't even show me the only thread on the entire forum with this exact title on page 1 of the search results. If there's an obscure or hidden option on the forum backend to make search results more relevant, I would very much appreciate its activation. As it stands now, forum users will have a very hard time finding what they're looking for, even when using the best possible search terms and refining the search. The results are just very irrelevant, and I find using Google to search for the exact same terms, prefixed with "dcs", tends to get me pointed exactly at the one, two or maybe three relevant threads and/or posts in this very forum. The search function on the old forum was much better than what we have now and showed much more relevant results. If we could get a better search function, that might also lead to fewer questions that have been answered many times already, because users who do use the search function will then get more relevant results.

Hello all, Quick question, has ED mentioned any plan for the F-16 to get the LANTIRN pod and Terrain Following Radar for low level Flight? I am coming from BMS and love using that system to navigate enemy airspace and am curious if it is coming soon to DCS. Thanks for the info.

The lack of LODs is now reported internally.

I also am eager for this feature. Seems to me that ED should just work it into the rearming menu. The kneeboard approach seems weird to me, but I appreciate the module makers for giving us a way.

Here is my key mappings for the A10-C II Tank Killer ... please give it a once over and comment on what you'd do differently. I included the .lua files so you can easily setup your X-56 if you like the current mappings. Thanks for commenting, C.T.Blankenship X56_Stick.diff.lua X56_Throttle.diff.lua

yes please... and also being able to group static units like normal active units.