Hulkbust44

Did you initially talk to Marshall for the approach? Mobius708

Sorry mate, you're going to have to explain that differently. Mobius708

HACQ is 10nm, LACQ is up to 40nm. No reason that LACQ can see to 40 everywhere but the HUD. It acts like it's HACQ when LACQ is selected. Mobius708

Pretty sure it's much earlier than that, last I tested it was sometime in 1986 Mobius708

The drift is definitely modeled, actually *I we modeled* when in NAV. Mobius708

Just toggle it with the RECEE/Event mark "switch." I do it all the time. I use to just turn the JHMCS off since I had the axis bound, not a good idea anymore... Mobius708

Not to be that guy, but have you tried aomg press? I usually hold it for a second or to. Mobius708

We've all have forgotten to set priority to the HARM before... Mobius708 For the second part, did you have HARM ORD boxed or unboxed? Mobius708

Which FLIR, and what tracking mode? Mobius708

This is certainly correct and definitely worked before. Mobius708

You're going to need to post a track for a bug report. Mobius708

Well RAID is scanning around the L+S, and as such you can't change the L+S in RAID. What you probably want is the expanded view function labeled EXP in the bottom left of the format. Mobius708

With a GMT STT the mav should slave to the GMT designation once uncaged. If this is what the issue is with it being wildly off or something, post a track so ED can investigate. With a TGT designated you can not slew the maverick. Mobius708

Well the HUD is messed up because you didn't complete your INS alignment. Hence, the LDDI advisories. (INS ATT - inertial navigation system attitude error, INS DEGO - inertial navigation system degraded.) Mobius708 Once airborne, to fix your INS alignment, if the mission date is after 1986, turn the INS knob to IFA for in flight alignment. You can monitor the status on the HSI. It will take about ten minutes. Mobius708

Lmao, a "five minute fix"... Do you know anything about software development? This would probably be one of the least useful things for DCS to have atm. Remember, over 70% of the player base is strictly single player. (Which is ridiculous) ED certainly isn't going to prioritize something like this, especially since it would require SRS to be meaningful. I would prefer to have transmission indications cue with SRS, but that's not happening anytime soon. Mobius708

Designation of a waypoint with WPDSG on the HSI. Mobius708

2. Yes, on the HMD format unbox BLANK. Mobius708

Definitely works/is necessary from a cold start. Mobius708

Yes, it is by far the best multirole DCS NATO aircraft. It is very very capable in DCS compared to everything else, and she's definitely not finished. Definitely a must have. Mobius708

Turn on the system, below the AMPCD. Set the switch to on/bypass. If on you must set up the CMS on the EW format. In bypass the countermeasures switch independently drips a pair off chaff or flare depending on the dispense switch position. Mobius708

With a high b-sweep as you would have with narrower azimuths, you also have cycling PRFs if set to interleaved. With the combination of these I don't see why a missile wouldn't be picked up by the radar, except at extreme ranges. The speed of the missiles also help as they have a much larger and easy to identify doppler shift. Mobius708

Nothing you've said yet has made logical sense. Mobius708

Wtf are you in about? You just contradicted yourself... Mobius708

So in that case it is still not supported by the aircraft if it retains the initial target. They were saying that you could like overide the guidance to prevent a Mad-dog missile. Mobius708

What, do you think every missile is built the same? Mobius708