Leaderboard

From Polychop Discord:

As I always say VR I will never ever try to be like the other modder. The other modder and I are two different people from two different continents with one common interest. Creating 3d Models for you all. We spend days and hours creating mods for you all to enjoy Free of charge! You all either like the mods or you don't. Either way, we continue creating models no matter what. At some point, I will move away from the Forum and post my mods on my Discord. I will let you all know when that will happen. On another note, the next mod up for release will be the Russian Destroyer Sovremenny.

Hi brems, It will be available soon. You will get some more news and probably be able to take a look at it very soon!

Artillerisystem 08 SPG (Sweden) version 1.3.0 released! Changelog Version 1.3.0 Fixed SGR 77B unguided shell accuracy issue IRGCN FAC (Iran) version 3.3.0 released! Changelog Version 3.3.0 Added capability to go in rivers Added player controlled machine guns and MANPADS Added tags Changed attributes to Corvettes

Oh no way! I dont prefer to see MSFS/FSX/P3D way in DCS. Better to have the whole World (like it was promised), however I'm afraid I may not live long enough to see it for myself, or I'll be so old that I won't be able to sit in a chair anymore .

With all the impressive modelling the community produces, I was wondering if anyone can make a static runway object? Say 200ft wide by 8000ft long, just plain black with dashed centerline. We have numerous buildings, apron equipment, working TACAN object, etc. With just a landable runway object, the possible user created air bases via template are substantial.. NAS Fallon (I believe we have a working IFLOS object to..), Al Udeid, etc......

Updated roughmets to take the shine out of the aluminium https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3332587/ null

As far as we know, they are. They have stated numerous times that they do not wish to get politically entangled for the sake of gamers.

I think I mentioned previously that my father served in the USN. He was on the Ashtabula, the L.Y. Spear, the Detroit, and the Platte. Dad and I got into flight sims when I was quite young - 12 or so. Before we had the internet, we would take turns flying A-10 Attack! on the Macintosh. Later, we flew together in Dawn of Aces, Warbirds, and I think a short stint in Aces High. He went down the dark road of NASCAR racing simulation, but got a real kick out of screenshots I sent him of your assets in DCS and always had a story to share about whatever particular ship I had screenshotted from above. I think he was really happy to see the AS/AO/AOE classifications represented in a sim. I think he toyed with the idea of getting back into flying with HBs F-14. A few months back, Enigma likened DCS to a digital museum, a place where history can be preserved and explored in a non-destructive manner. I don't disagree, but there's something more to it for a lot of folks: DCS can serve as a connection to memories in a way that a brick and mortar museum cannot. Dad passed away late last year(on Thanksgiving day of all days), and I still feel a small connection to him when I fly over the L.Y. Spear or Detroit. My point is that while your work is important to a lot of people because of the capability and class/type representation you bring to DCS, for others the assets you create serve as a connection to memories and relationships past. Thank you.

I meant the website, Admiral, not your mods. No problem, keep up the good work.

@Admiral189 Just checked out your YouTube. Fantastic videos of the Burke, Sovremenny, and the Virginia. It'll be great to have some mid-to-late Cold War ships for various scenarios. Fantastic work. Keep it up!

A HUGE THANK YOU "Eight Ball" Area 51 has visitors!!!!

Are we getting closer? Looks so cool.

What Airfield are you on? Sitting at Wadi al Jandali (right next to Cairo) I get 2 hrs difference. I have 10.00hrs analog time and 08.00hrs UFC time. And here is what I thnk happens: - Analog clock shows local time - UFC clock shows GMT, and currently GMT is the same as BST - BST is 1 hrs ahead of UTC <- what we expect it to be In that case 10/ 08 would be correct. The 5 mins you get are because the UFC clock only starts ticking once the right engine is up and running, so whatever minutes difference you have is the time you needed to start your engine.

Hi, this is correct as is, if you have unclassified evidence to state otherwise please feel free to DM me. thanks

Yes this is as it should be. Older block 30 aircraft was vibrating during FLCS test. Even that vibration was disturbing the INS alignment.

Missions with a mission date prior to 1994 will not have GPS. In the F-16 you can currently check if GPS is available on the FIX page of the DED (as the actual GPS page isn't implemented yet): You can also just disable the GPS receiver on the F-16 by setting the GPS switch to OFF on the system panel on the right side. Without GPS, the INS will not be able to automatically update its position and will start to drift over time (you will notice waypoints aren't exactly where they are supposed to be anymore), requiring manual nav fixes in order to keep the INS accurate.

Thank you! They're not released yet. I'm still finishing up a few items. At the least, very certainly next month.

В ТЕМУ по STORE

Да такое чувство, что и со вторым угадал, еще точнее чем с первым Ну какая реклама, какая мне выгода? Что кто-то еще поймет, как летают в реале самолеты? Что управление это не - ручку от себя домики больше, на себя - домики меньше Я лишь один из многих пользователей устройства, я его не собираю, не продаю. Я просто описываю свои ощущения и восторг от использования. Мне ни кто тут ничего не запрещает, и это же не я тут рьяно доказываю, что это все это блажь и не нужно. Свалили все в кучу, теплое с мягким, от окультизма до рекламы, развеселили, ей богу От виар, все беды от виар, и еще нарко зависимость, и еще в лифте нагадили тоже от виар. Чистое зло. Ваше отношение к ВР известно, когда в недавней теме, вы, имея минимальный опыт использования, написали больше всех, насколько ВР плох На самом деле этот ФФБ оооочень сильно дополняет ВР, иммерсивность зашкаливает. Среди пользователей этих устройств есть бывшие и действующие летчики, и их выбор не в пользу пружинных джойстиков и настольного антиквариата с ФФБ.

Hey Timex, a good video card will make a world of difference along with enough ram and a good cpu. I have a GTX-3080 Graphics card and about 64 Gigs of Ram with an I9. You should be able to see things clearer with a good video card. Thanks, Highmaintenance for the update. All of that sounds like work lol. Sorry my eyes can't catch everything. VR Flight it's there. At the very top of the page. ALL MY NEW AI SHIP MODS WILL BE LOCATED HERE: Admiral189 DCS World Mods Jackd i use OVGME for installing my mods because i can better manage them. I saw a ship similar to that today but didn't get the name. Is there a model of that ship online? Below is something for your entertainment. Also, if you follow me on Youtube you can see what I'm working on. 1970s Virginia Class Cruiser USS Virginia CG-38 WIP.

When I remove the weapon pylon the sight is removed like normal. But, since the last update, when I later add weapons and the pylon is re-enabled the sight is no longer replaced. So I get weapons with no sight picture.

No offense was taken. But I think you are over-estimating how complex of a process this is, or when the process is being undertaken. Aircrews are not doing fuel volume->weight conversions "on the fly". They are sitting on the ground and simply inputting the number of gallons that the refueling personnel have pumped into the external fuel tanks, which the avionics automatically adds to the total fuel weight, based on the selected fuel type. If the fuel input was required to be in pounds, then that would require the aircrew to perform a manual conversion. This method removes that step, and let's the aircraft do it. The developers of the Apache wouldn't change this, because doing it how you would suggest would make it more complicated and add greater chance of a mistake. I don't think the video game experience of a real-life aircraft is an adequate determination of what a real-life aerospace company would or wouldn't do. Also keep in mind, that this is just for the external tanks, which are only intended for long-range ferry flights. So even though the 230-gallon ERFS tanks have been used on some combat missions in the past out of necessity, it is not something that you would use on long-term deployments where crews are suffering from chronic fatigue. Further, the fuel is still getting pumped into the internal fuel tanks which do have their own fuel quantity sensors so you know exactly how much fuel you have internally for several more hours, and there is also a sensor in the external fuel tanks that indicate when the tank is empty. It's not like the aircraft is going to suddenly flame out because the aircrew thought there was still fuel in the externals. The only calculations the crew will need to do is for aircraft performance planning for how much weight they are taking on, and how that affects their range or station time. But that is something that the aircrews already do every day from the first day of flight school and throughout the rest of their career. This isn't rocket science, or something that is only done every once in a while, this is part of the job and is second nature.

A/G gun still doesn't work either.

I will upload them later tonight

Если мы говорим о современных самолётах с бустерной гидросистемой, то там ФФБ особого смысла не имеет. Там нужны пружинные загружатели с жестким центром и демпфером. Максимум это менять передаточное отноешние по тангажу и всё. Если про совсем современные самолёты с СДУ (FCS, КСУ и так далее) то там и демпфера не надо.

The CBU 97 is a 'dumb' bomb so you need to know which direction the wind is coming from. In my experience the best results come when i drop the bomb a little bit long to target in to the wind. Also the burst height is very important, if it is to high the bomblets will float away on the wind. 900 Feet burst height works pretty good imo, then the bomblets will despence and be put to work almost immediately The CBU 105 is the same bomb as the CBU 97 but with a wind correction kit, when they add this to the arsenal of the F15E the wind drift won't be a big problem anymore

The problem is, if data is considered still to be secret by Russia's authorities, than it doesn't matter if it's been made public elsewhere. And here in Russia, especially in light of war-time legislation that has been passed since last Febuary, no one would like to give our law enforcement officials a slightest excuse for starting a persecution.

Thank you so much everyone for the tips. I will start a long AAR session today and tell you how did it go.

Good point. This will be addressed in the next manual update.

18 августа 2023 года Дорогие друзья, Мы обновили DCS Открытая бета 2.8.8.43489, в которой появилась долгожданная функция для Ми-8МТВ2 - мульти-экипаж! Это захватывающее дополнение позволяет управлять вертолетом экипажем, выводя концепцию командной работы на новый уровень. Мы рады показать скриншоты тщательно воссозданной модели пилота для ударного вертолёта DCS: Ми-24П. Подробности ниже. Смотрите скриншоты разработки, следите за новостями! Новая кампания DCS: Ми-24П "Граница" от Армена Муразяна - это захватывающая кампания с 12 сюжетными миссиями и широким спектром задач, включая патрулирование, сопровождение конвоев с оружием и транспортными полетами. Наконец, не забывайте, что Конкурс ливрей для B-17 продолжается и это ваш последний шанс принять в нём участие и выиграть призы. Искренне с Вами, Команда Игл Дайнемикс Мульти-экипаж Отчёт о разработке В последнем обновлении открытой бета-версии были реализованы долгожданная функция мульти-экипаж и соответствующие изменения для голосового чата и поддержки грузовых операций. Доступны четыре позиции экипажа, включая пилотов и бортового стрелка. Мы добавили новую функциональность для присоединения к экипажу, позволяющую командиру видеть запросы на различные роли. В DCS: Ми-8МТВ2 для ИИ бортмеханик (центральное место в кабине) предусмотрены специальные функции экипажа, такие как наблюдение за автопилотом по запросу. Если эту роль занимает игрок, то данный функционал перестает работать автоматически. При работе с грузом бортмеханик перемещается в грузовую кабину для наблюдения и управления грузовыми операциями. DCS: Ми-24П Отчёт о разработке Близится к завершению работа над 3D-моделью пилота с видом от первого лица. Стоит отметить, что работа над этими моделями представляет собой сложный процесс. Вот основные этапы: Этап 1 - Моделирование фигуры пилота: За основу берётся фигура человека, на которую накладывается текстура ткани униформы. На этом этапе мы анализируем фотографии, видеозаписи, общаемся с пилотами и специалистами по техническому обслуживанию, чтобы уточнить все нюансы. Затем вручную вносятся коррективы в униформу, прорабатываются мелкие элементы, перчатки, ремни и т.д. Прорабатывается модель лица подходящего персонажа с последующим текстурированием кожи и деталей. Этап 2 - Размещение модели пилота в кабине и анимация: Анимации в кокпите подобраны таким образом, чтобы обеспечить естественные, реалистичные движений тела, головы и рук. Для достижения реалистичности определяются и дорабатываются частные анимации, такие как взгляд через прицел и взаимодействие с панелями кабины. Наконец, каждый член экипажа получает анимацию, имитирующую его гибель. С расчетом на VR, наша цель - обеспечить реалистичность и погружение, создать ощущение, что это ваше собственное тело. Граница Кампания для Ми-24П Приготовьтесь отправиться в захватывающее путешествие, полное адреналина и быстрых решений. В регионе, охваченном войной, вам предстоит пройти сложные задания, которые проверят ваши навыки пилотирования и тактическое мастерство. Кампания DCS: Ми-24П "Граница" предлагает захватывающий сюжет насыщенный боевыми сценариями. Приобретайте её прямо сейчас. Наслаждайтесь! Ещё раз спасибо за ваш энтузиазм и поддержку! Искренне с вами,

Kudos on the details of the INS in that case. It maybe a good idea then also to mention this in the manual that any movement on the aircraft interferes with the alignment.

It would be petty of them not to appreciate the tribute, mille millions de mille sabords ! * *Sorry, DeepL doesn't seem appropriate for translation....

Gentlemen, how often needs this to be repeated? Look at the screenshots and videos released so far, what can we see? 1.) German Airforce Eurofighters with tactical codes representing Tranche 2 standard aircraft. 2.) A Tranche 2/3 cockpit layout. 3.) The Meteor missile introduced on the Typhoon with the P2E capability standard, which is compatible with T2/3 aircraft. What has additionally been said by HB/TG? 1.) That the aircraft will be limited to AA at the beginning. Does it make it T1? No it doesn't, it simply means that systems functionality and weapons related to AG stuff will only be added after EA has started. 2.) That the capability standard reflected will be more a kind of "Frankenphoon", dependent on data/information availability certain system capabilities might reflect earlier, or later standards, in a combination that doesn't reflect any particular inservice standard. 3.) They may do other nations Typhoons, but I'm inclined to believe, that at least at the beginning you will have to live the the German variant with different liveries representing other operators. MARTE-ER anti-ship missiles are not integrated on the Typhoon yet either, images showing the aircraft on ground with these missiles doesn't change that. So no, MARTE-ER will almost certainly not be part of the HB DCS Eurofighter.

Дело даже не в опыте. Чел взял устройство, даже не проверив, что межзрачковое расстояние у шлема подходит его крабьим глазам, а потом сеит дезинформацию.

Наша песня хороша, начинай сначала) Можешь не пытаться что-то доказывать, т.к. это как в спорте. Или ходишь пьешь пивко, или ходишь занимаешься спортом. Когда человек сам осознает плюсы виара и управления с большими усилиями, то он сам придёт сюда и скажет спасибо. И слепому понятно, что на большом мониторе, пользуясь зумом и летая на лайтовой загрузке, можно нагибать намного успешнее, чем потея в виар и двигая достаточно тяжелую ручку. Но от тяжелой ручки и виара вырабатывается пространественное ощущения самолёта и обстановки вокруг, а от крепкого управления появляется более дозированное ощущение на критических режимах. Но кому это надо, если люди хотят легкой жизни ?) П.С. забавно читать, как люди никогда не щупали девайс и не летали на нём хотя бы месяц, но уже доказывают что-то.

Honestly, that’s a 2.5 years old version, I have no way to know if this Mod would work on it or not, you would have to try and test. Also, any bug report that you make will probably not be useful, as I doubt that ED is still giving support for older versions.

Yup, from footage online, Iskander-M does not separate it's warhead section from the main rocket body. At 1:35 it shows the impact, and it's basically the whole missile.

The Mirage F1 recently changed a lot of the internal ID numbers associated to each control, that’s what probably left the previous profiles obsolete.

Ого, понаписали простыней то) Господа, вы похожи на брюзжащих стариков, которым все новое поперек горла, а антиквариат МСФФБ это предел мечтаний Эти устройства, очень и очень классные, приближающие еще ближе к реалу любимые симуляторы, дающие новые ощущения и опыт, такие, что после боя вываливаешься из "кокпита" в мыле и охеревшим, это не двумя пальчиками пластиковую палочку теребонькать, это когда на руде выставил режим и двумя руками ручку тягаешь на выводе и на перекладках, а педаль в пикировании не продавить. Я сам в симуляторах с 2003, и устройств было много разных, и из магазина, и самоделок, напольники, настульники, настольники, всякие были, но вот эти устройства, это просто бомба, все что у меня было до этого не сравнится c этим ффб комлектом.

Great stuff. Installing them how? With JSGME? PS i would love to see the infamous Karaboudjan for some fun time,, or even WW2 mission making ... someone would be extremely happy, but you might consider a different ship's name for possible copyright problems bu Herge"s family ...

Last time we got any screenshot from DC it was in 2020, maybe we could get a glimpse of how it look right now? Maybe just a screenshot of the dynamic campaign interface?

This is saddening and I will personally mail fifteen dubiously malodorous pipe-shaped packages to the US Air Force Reserve to get them to reinstate F-4E combat status so that I can watch USAF F-4Es with GE F110s, AIM-9Xs, JHMCS, BOZ Countermeasures rails, AMRAAMs, the AN/APG-78 AESA RADAR, pits ripped out of F-15Es and LANTIRN pods fly against the 3000 White J-7Es of Xi. Then we'll see who gets the last laugh. (NOTE TO MY PERSONALLY ASSIGNED REDHEAD TOMBOY FBI/ASIO AGENT: THIS IS A JOKE. ALSO, YOU ARE VERY HOT. SEND NUDES. NOTE TO NERDS: THIS IS A JOKE. PLEASE PUT THE 40,000 WORD ESSAY ON THE SUPERIORITY OF GEN 4 PLATFORMS AWAY)

There is a problem with lofting Phoenix against low supersonic targets. I tried to engage SS-N-19 Shipwreck missiles. If the Phoenix lofts, it comes down too late resulting in a terminal perpendicular dive from which it has no chance to hit the target. It would need to dive earlier and flatter to hit the target head-on. The only success I had was launches under 20 NM where the Phoenix doesn't loft at all and goes straight for the target. If it lofts it is a guaranteed miss. No track because they don't play back correctly anyway, but you can check out the test scenario in the mission below. Phoenix_Shipwreck.miz

It’s not enough just to have the F-4G. DCS needs much higher fidelity SAM and IADS threats to fight against. So HB couldn’t just make an F-4G and call it good- they’d have to work with ED to basically build an entirely new library of threats to electronically fight. “Starbaby” has a lot of videos describing the cat and mouse game between IADS operators and the Weasels. Good SAM operators would do tricks like fire a missile blind and then illuminate the target at the last moment to deny RWR alerts, or launching from one site using terminal radar guidance from a different one to dodge ARMs. That’s why the APR-47 in the F-4G was so complex: you needed that kit to effectively fight SAM shooters who want to survive and win too. It’s also why the F-16/HARM combination doesn’t replace what was lost when the F-4G was retired, but that’s a topic for another day. Brass tacks, for the F-4G to make sense DCS needs to realistically simulate modern IADS, and enable players to act as cunning SAM shooters in MP. I think electronic warfare would be a damn fun expansion to the DCS experience - anyone game for a Tornado ECR?- but just dropping the F-4G and calling it done won’t work.

https://www.instagram.com/reel/Cv-afrRNQuD/?igshid=MzRlODBiNWFlZA%3D%3D heablur showing off phantom and ef2000 reel