Leaderboard

Version 1.0 of Polish Modernised Fulcrum Mod is released! Link to my newly created Discord with all my mods (including this one's download link) in the description Please read the README before submitting any issues! Hope you like the mod, feel free to share your thoughts!

please don't ignore all of the updates over the years and advancement we have made. While DCS is over 16 years old we have been constantly working on the core and updating code. Of course there is old code, but it doesn't stop us from advancing DCS. thank you

Hi. I have those liveries' plan about Brazil and Chile after I'll draw panel lines and normal maps. Some government operating liveries will be also --- Brunei / Uzbekistan / UAE / Israel / Cameroon ? (Some insignia , Coat of Arms' graphics are hard to prepare , my worry) Tanker variant(s) will have their own 3d models and I won't draw USA / Italy / Japan / Colombia tanker liveries on current airliner model. Military charter airlines are in my plans --- Atlas Air / North American / current Eastern .... after cargo template ready .... ABX / Amerijet / ATI / West Atlantic. wip for -200 variant ---

It's important to remember that the "2025 and Beyond" video is always about a given year and the future. Just because we see something there doesn't mean it will appear in a given year. Here's an example summary found on Discord with the latest video "2024 and Beyond": The work is still in progress and let's hope that some of it will appear in 2025. 2024 definitely suffered under the influence of WWII, nothing appeared here so fingers crossed still!

Выдрал с инсты

Good Afternoon everyone and Happy New Year to you all once again. I hope you're doing well. Thanks, Guys, for the well wishes. I will just call it and say my health will improve this year. Keeping a positive attitude towards life is very important when dealing with health issues and having a loving family makes it all worthwhile. That's a great photo Ggrewe! It fits perfectly with the background. Hey Yann59. if you can find a good detailed 3d model of the Kiev carrier I can look at adding it to my work list but I have to mention it may be some time before I can get to any new additions. Unfortunately, I don't have the talent to create Fighter Jets. I can but it's a lot of work. I do have a Military helicopter I will be working on though. Thanks. I have started the New Year off working on the Horizon Frigates. As you can see below I've already started arming the Andrea Doria. Forbin weapons are slightly different. It has one less 76mm Main gun. I didn't realize but these guys have a lot of weapons. 48 Missile cells holding Aster 15 & 39 Surface to Air Missiles. I have to animate the missile hatches with the low brown texture. Stay Tuned. More AI Ship mods coming.

Starting with Port Stanley.

VIRPIL Customer here, never had a problem.

A comment from me: I would be very interested, but their website is only available in Polish. An English version would be very helpful.

Long time ago I've created static templates for most of the South Atlantic airports, airfields and air bases. Since in the meantime Massun's pack got incorporated to the DCS Core and some of the mods got discontinued I plan to redo them and this time share with the public. Given the available assets the "scenario" was Argentina teaming up with Russian expeditionary force standing against UK/NATO & Chilean forces and most likely I will keep it like that. Mods that will most likely be used are as follows: SAM Sites Asset Pack Civil Aircraft Mod VPC Airfield Equipment TTTwJ Jets Airport Services Vehicles Eight Ball AI Seaking Military Asset Packs by Currenthill 476th Range Targets Package CAP Vehicles CLP Mods Military Aircraft Mod ? Let me know if you have any thoughts or ideas. Anyway... templates are coming.

Hello everyone. I wanted to share with you my experience of using FFBeast in DCS with the way of tuning it through the software. So far I was able to make two videos explaining benefits of using my FFBeast set up with non boosted direct control aircrafts and helicopters.

Make it so #1. Would be fantastic to reenact the Korean War and future war scenarios.

I have some specific details on day to day events, like take off times and locations, formations, loadouts etc. My dream is to one day tell some of these stories through Angolan Theatre campaigns. But a map requires a lot of 3D modelling and that is a big obstacle when it comes to South African content. After a few years of working on a project (Cheetah C mod, not related to border war I know but the documentation and resources I have on it is unrivaled so I remain committed to it), I realized that the only people who are interested enough to make a commitment to working on these things are South Africans. And I have also realized most South Africans who are interested either don't have the skillsets or have the skillsets but cannot commit due to other side projects making part of their income. With the Cheetah C mod requiring 3D modelling, I have only encountered a few people from eastern Europe who seemed interested but not interested enough to make the commitment, or requiring me to pay their monthly salary which I cannot do out of my pocket. The modelling of one single aircraft, or a map, is at least a multi month endeavor. I have also met someone who can help with the CFD but even though he is a South African with a passion for SAAF aircraft, he could not commit due to his side projects taking priority as they produce income. There are some people who worked on an Impala mod but that also came to a halt as far as I can see, looks like due to a lack of interest in development work. I believe we can get a fleshed out Angolan Theatre in about a decade or two if we can overcome this obstacle of not having people with enough interest to make a commitment and the skills required to see a project through. I am only a programmer, and I understand how DCS aircraft are developed, and that is where I can spend my efforts. We have some documentation on Impalas and Mirages and maybe even the Buccaneer (I can check with someone maintaining the one at Ysterplaat), not enough for official modules but enough for EFM mods. I know there are people at Ysterplaat and Swartkop who will help when asked, they even opened the Cheetah E and C cockpits for me after years of not being opened. We also have many photos of the region from the time, especially the people in the `South African Border War: Operation Savannah` Discord channel for Arma and Squad mods. Maybe we just need to congregate and put together what we have and then decide if we can achieve something with what we have, and then what we are going to work on and take it one project at a time.

That is patently untrue. I've seen literally dozens of them, clustered inside these Spanish, Italian, Greek and Lebanese restaurants in Hamburg. Even - nay especially - in winter....

Agreed. For me, "the core" would represent the stuff we get with DCS, and that is shared between all missions (meaning: third party work like Kola, Phantom etc) is not part of the core. Fog is, and - even though it remains far behind our hopes, and makes a mockery of the term "realism" - it has added a lot for me in terms of immersion (shooting a successful precision approach in IMC with ground fog now has become so much more gratifying). I truly hope that the core (shared infrastructure) improves this year, to prevent DCS becoming a hollowed-out shell that merely feeds off its former reputation. There's a lot of technical debt piling up, and the fine folk at ED are hopefully up for the challenge and can resist the temptation to merely milk the crowds through ever-new unfinished modules. I don't know about you, I own some 20 Early Access modules (yeah, slow learner), and i would love to see some of them receiving updates to make them true, quality releases - and the core to receive enough updates to raise overall quality of DCS to a 2020 level app (to me, it currently feels like an early 2000 level app). Here's to ED mastering that challenge and hopefully many, many more years of excitement.

Wie Phantom711 schon sagte, kann eine Kalibrierung das Problem beheben. Wobei mein TM Warthog das auch hat, und ich habe mich einfach dran gewöhnt. Allerdings bin ich auch nie sicher, ob DCS nicht einfach simuliert, dass die beiden Triebwerke nicht exakt identisch sind und leicht Unterschiedlich auf die Schubhebel reagieren. Vor allem Heatblur hat in der F-14 sehr genau auf solche Details geachtet, um die Simulation lebendiger zu machen. Bei so kleinen Unterschieden in der Leistung sollte man jedenfalls keine Probleme mit asymmetrischem Schub bekommen. Den Verbindungspin zwischen den Schubhebeln habe ich anfangs auch immer genutzt, aber in echten Flugzeugen gibt es sowas meines Wissens gar nicht, da kann man jeden Hebel die ganze Zeit individuell bewegen. Irgendwann habe ich den Pin gelöst und nie wieder genutzt. Hat auch den Vorteil, dass man bei einseitigem Triebwerksausfall sofort reagieren kann. Und auch wenn ich beispielsweise bei der Luftbetankung kein Fan von asymmetrischem Schub bin, kann es helfen, genau die richtige Geschwindigkeit zu treffen, wenn man die Schubhebel eine Prise unterschiedlich setzt. Dafür sind die Landeklappen ja auch da. Spaß bei Seite, eine alternative Bezeichnung für Landeklappen ist "High Lift Device", und die ganze Idee hinter den Landeklappen ist es, die Flügelfläche und das Flügelprofil so zu verändern, dass die Flügel mit ausgefahrenen Klappen mehr Auftrieb erzeugen und Start und Landung entsprechend weniger Anströmgeschwindigkeit der Luft brauchen, was in der Folge eine geringere Start- und Landegeschwindigkeit als ohne Klappen bedeutet (und damit weniger benötigte Landebahn, weniger Reifen- und Bremsverschleiß und so weiter). Und nach dem Start fährt man die Klappen ein, sobald man sie nicht mehr benötigt. Damit wird man auch gleich deren Luftwiderstand los und kann nun mit geringerem Luftwiderstand und höherer Geschwindigkeit effizienter fliegen. Kurz und gut, es muss ja so sein, dass sich mit dem Ausfahren der Klappen die Fluglage verändert. Die Hornet ist zwar ein Fly-by-Wire-Jet, in dem das Flugsteuersystem die Eingaben des Piloten interpretiert und dann entscheidet, wie die Steuerflächen bewegt werden, um das gewünschte Ergebnis zu erzielen (anders als in der Tomcat, wo der Pilot direkt die Steuerflächen bewegt), aber die Hornet ist inzwischen auch schon ganz schön alt und das Fly-by-Wire war eine sehr frühe Generation, kann also nicht einfach den Effekt der Landeklappen wegoptimieren. Ich kann mich da meinen Vorrednern nur anschließen; ein kurzer Track wäre super. Am Ende eines kurzen Fluges auf "Track speichern" klicken und uns den hier hochladen, dann können wir mal schauen. Generell ist landen in jedem Flugzeug ziemlich schwierig und teilweise sehr kontraintuitiv. Meine Empfehlung wäre, am Anfang erst einmal die Landung auf einer Landebahn an Land zu meistern. Welches Flugzeug du wählst, ist eigentlich zweitrangig, aber am besten wählst du eins und bleibst dann erstmal dabei, damit du dich daran gewöhnen kannst. Und dann schööööööön lange Straight-In-Landungen aus 10 Meilen Entfernung fliegen. Faustregel im imperialen System: In 10 Meilen Entfernung vom Aufsetzpunkt sollte man 3.000 Fuß über der Landebahn fliegen. In der Kaukasus-Karte sind die Flughäfen in Meeresnähe alle annähernd auf Normal Null, da kannst du also einfach 3.000 Fuß über Normal Null ansetzen, und für die 10 Meilen kann man beispielsweise Wegpunkte setzen, Funkfeuer (TACAN) nutzen oder im Missionseditor irgendwas gut sichtbares dort platzieren - auf dem Meer vielleicht einen großen Frachter, und am Boden vielleicht einen hohen Comm-Tower oder ein anderes gut sichtbares Gebäude. Und dann gaaaaanz seicht mit 3° sinken. Einige Flughäfen haben PAPIs (Precision Approach Path Indicators), das sind diese 4 Lichter direkt neben dem Aufsetzpunkt. Je nach deinem Gleitpfad zeigen die dir unterschiedliche Farben: 4 weiß: du bist deutlich zu hoch 3 weiß, 1 rot: du bist knapp zu hoch 2 weiß, 2 rot: du bist genau auf dem Gleitpfad 1 weiß, 3 rot: du bist etwas zu tief 4 rot: du bist viel zu tief! (eine Merkhilfe, die ich mal gehört habe: "Red, you're dead. White, you're alright") So ein ewig langer Anflug aus 10 Meilen mag total langweilig wirken, aber man lernt dabei, wie sich Stick und Throttle bzw. Pitch und Thrust auswirken. Erst wenn das sitzt, würde ich kürzere Anflüge probieren und auch mal absichtlich mit zu viel Tempo oder zu viel Höhe ankommen und schauen, ob man die Maschine noch auf den Boden gequetscht und vor dem Ende der Bahn zu stehen kriegt. Dann kann man das CASE I Pattern üben - ebenfalls an Land. Natürlich fährt die Landebahn nicht mit 25 Knoten von einem Weg und ist auch nicht schräg. Aber es hilft, um sich die Abläufe ins Gehirn zu hämmern und das Muskelgedächtnis aufzubauen, das man dann anschließend abrufen kann, wenn man das zuvor geübte am Flugzeugträger in die Praxis umsetzt. Achso, und falls es dich beruhigt: Meine CASE I Pattern sehen immer noch aus wie Kraut und Rüben. Ich habe es echt oft probiert und teilweise 2 Wochen am Stück, aber irgendwie wird es bei mir nicht besser. Aber Hornet und Tomcat sind auch nicht meine primären Muster in DCS, deshalb finde ich das nicht schlimm. Dafür sehen meine Landungen in der A-10 normalerweise ganz passabel aus. Will sagen: Dranbleiben, üben, üben, üben, und ruhig mal deinen Fortschritt mit uns teilen, sei es mit Tracks oder Videos oder einfach ein paar Beschreibungen hier im Forum, damit du ein wenig Feedback bekommst, ob du auf dem richtigen Weg bist und ob sich vielleicht bestimmte Ungenauigkeiten oder Fehler eingeschlichen haben.

Am 16. Januar erscheint der “2025 and beyond Video“. Darin werden wohl der Eurofighter und die Dynamische Kampagne zu sehen sein:

@AusMumbles Here is the link on aliexpress, but it should be the same: Aliexpress The 5 row switch is indeed smaller, that's why I modeled hats that compensate for this offset. I will publish the files as soon as this is finalized.

From the AviaStorm's Discord Channel https://discord.com/channels/1020277498363269120/1020303137145368627/1323906750151397386 Happy new year, leaving 2024 in the rear view mirror and onwards to 2025!

I’ve owned Virpil gear for around 7 years now and have a number of their items. I’ve found their customer support to be excellent.

Who are you, and why should we take your opinion seriously when it seems all you did was register here to make Virpil look bad For your 1 warning and more specifically, your 1 post, there are 100's of positive dealings with Virpil

Can we have the nose wheel steering enable/disable and L/R brake axis assignments in 2022?

ALPHA STATION - CHAPTER ONE UNITED STATIONS QUICK REACTION FORCE In 1978, the United Nations created a quick reaction force able to respond to crises around the world in minimal time.  Though due to the large number of flare ups in the Middle East, this force was established to handle conflicts anywhere.  Many countries donated equipment and manpower to the cause, but a few nations saw the opportunity to contribute to a cause able to potentially stop hostilities before they flared into regional affairs.  These countries, the United States, United Kingdom, and Germany, donated the bulk of the larger equipment.  The United States in particular, donated several smaller aircraft carriers and the aircraft to staff them as well as two full air transport units. The force was designated as the United Nations Quick Reaction Force and fell under control of the UN Secretary General and the Security Council.  The force was assembled in Southern Turkey due in large part to the available training area, but also because there was a good chance that would be relatively close to their first action. A large influx of supplies and equipment has been flowing to the training centers at Incirlik and Gazipasa.  Unfortunately, most of the donor nations haven’t had time to repaint their donations so the individual QRF units are working to repaint and remark their units as able. The personnel in the UN QRF are taken from military units among all UN members. Preference was given to aircrew, ship’s crew, maintenance, and other specialty skills.  Pay is still handled by service members’ military branches. Your unit is the 2nd Tactical Strike Squadron.  Currently you are split between Gazipasa and Incirlik but you and a handfull of others were selected to operate out of Gazipasa.  As your unit develops its procedures, it was generally agreed that US Navy procedures would be a base as everybody is familiar with them.  Ground crews and other agencies are filled out from member nations so you may experience a variety of different nationalities as you serve. Beginning your assignment, this will basically be a wring out as everybody gets used to operating together and checking out your equipment.  Everybody in your unit has flown the A4 for a while, but you are the only one to be operating aircraft you were assigned to. ……….. Stage One of the campaign will be ramp up and getting your feet under you…for Stage Two. ALPHA STATION.ZIP may be unzipped directly into your DCS Saved Games Folder, it will extract itself correctly. At the bottom of this document are the links to download them directly if you wish. I chose not to include the mods in the Campaign zip as I understand some folks are anal about their installs and would rather handle it themselves via OVGME or whatever method you use. Honestly though, these are not difficult to install. null Mod requirements:  Community A4C, 476th Range Targets There are several scripts enabled within each mission: MOOSE - ATIS and AIRBOSS, MIST for Target Information Tracking Script (TITS), splash damage script.  There are reminders on each mission, but for all these scripts to run properly, when the role select screen is presented, press ESC to make the menu go away, then again to go ahead select your role. If you have never used TITS before, spend some time on Mission 5 getting acquainted with the menus before hitting the range your first time.  You can specify targets for designation by the range controller.  They will fire a smoke rocket, if requested, that will be near your requested target.  You will also get target elevation information. Prior to engaging your target, select ROLLING IN off the range menu otherwise the controllers will be angry with you and you will not get drop results.   You may select OFF TARGET after each pass to get results for each pass or when you are all done with your range time to get a full result list. If you have never used AIRBOSS before, do the same thing prior to Mission 13.  There are a number of controls you can activate within the menus, but for basic pattern and landing you won’t be required to do anything.  The F10 menu for AIRBOSS replaces the stock ATC menu.  You can contact Marshall inside 50 miles. You will receive Marshall stack instructions from the Marshall controller.  You will get advisories along the way from the controller on stack positioning as well as when the carrier is beginning recovery activities if they weren’t already.  Once you have worked your way down the stack and are starting your initial, change frequencies to the LSO controller for final instructions and landing scores. When departing off the carrier be tuned to the MARSHALL controller who will notify you of radar contact after launch and will then release you from control as you depart the area. If you are staying in the pattern select EMERGENCY LANDING prior to launching and you will be automatically sequenced into the downwind pattern by the LSO controller. This is a Dropbox link for a .rar file containing the entire campaign and one accompanying skin. Uncompress to your saved games folder. https://www.dropbox.com/s/b7b2omx5j9volbe/Alpha Station Chapter One.rar?dl=0 476th VFS Range Targets Mod https://www.476vfightergroup.com/downloads.php?do=download&downloadid=482 A-4E-C https://github.com/heclak/community-a4e-c Special thanks to HighlandSpring for his detailed testing and feedback during development. Thank you to Plumsy for the voiceovers. “Hops” isn’t done yet.

If that includes working wiper blades for the Huey, I'll be in heaven.

Have you tried looking at the manual? It's actually really simple... You just flip the safety, the cover for the bomb switches, select the station and fuzes, open the bay and drop them...

If you have a problem, then search the forums and you will generally find that you are not alone ...

Вопрос только в том, сколько жабр и шасси к этому моменту уцелеет, и сколько человек сможет их поднять в воздух. Всё это ерунда. Лишь бы модулей красных и синих побольше качественных делали.

The guy made one post and hasn't been on since the 27th. We may not see him back.

Update: I did some more testing and my guess right now is that it might be a LOS issue. I whipped up a new mission where I had a moving target roaming about on flat, unobstructed terrain. I then created the exact same JTAC setup with an MQ-9 loitering above and lasing the target for me. This time, the LGB hit the target right on the mark. Back to the original mission that's giving me issues, the convoy I'm targeting is moving through a small countryside road that's lined by trees on both sides. I think that the MQ-9's laser is being blocked by those trees, and consequently that is where the LGB impacts. So yeah... it's an LOS issue, but to be more specific, a JTAC skill issue. The AI JTAC simply isn't that good, so now I'm going to have to wait until the convoy reaches a clearing before I ask the MQ-9 to start lasing.

Hi Also wenn es ums fliegen lernen geht steht eine Trägerlandung erstmal gaanz weit hinten. Am Anfang solltest Du Dich erstmal um die Grundlagen kümmern! (Sorry) Habe mir nur kurz Deinen Track mit der FA-18 angeschaut. Sehe mal zuerst dass der Waffenhauptschalter auf ARM steht! Dann gehts auf die Landung zu. Und da stimmt weder Geschwindigkeit noch der AOA. Das Flugzeug sollte getrimmt sein bevor Du aufschlägst! Mit dem Steuerknüppel wird im Endanflug eigentlich nur noch um die Längsachse korrigiert Höhe nur noch über den Schub. Wenn das nicht klappt passt was nicht! Dein Throttel kennt in Deinem Track eigentlich nur zwei Stellungen: Vollschub und kein Schub. Vesuche den Throttle feiner zu brdienen. Das Teil ist eigentlich nonstop in Bewegung. Das braucht etwas Training. Hast Du die Trainingsmissionen der FA-18 schon gemacht? Da wird eigentlich der ganze Vorgang gut erklärt. Was sehr hilfreich ist: Simulier einen Anflug erstmal mit genügend Höhe. Fahr bei 250 Knoten Fahrwerk, Klappen und Flaps aus und trimme die Kiste so das Du gemütlich mit dem Throttle die Höhe halte kannst. Wenn das klappt übe dasselbe und sinkst dabei. Und immer alles innerhalb der AOA Parameter! Irgendwann klappts dann auch mit der Landung. Was die Grundlagen der Fliegerei anbelangt kann ich wie @Volator schon bemerkte einen Trainer empfehlen. Ich selber finde immer noch die L-39 ein sehr gelungenes Muster und mit den Trainingsflügen dort erlernt man die Grundlagen und auch Navigation. Mal ganz abgesehen davon dass die L-39 Albatros einen Heidenspass macht! Das wird schon Landung auf dem Flugfeld nach Sichtflugregeln.pdf

arg 442 at -0.1 removes the next number (or 3rd zero) one to go.....

Daily MiG-29 Swifts 9.13 and 9.51

@toan Yak-38 was avaliable on Cubanace discord.

There is a lot that is taken into account when picking and setting fuzes. It all depends on the mission and the desired effect the pilot is trying to achieve. I can tell you common settings for MK82/MK84 M904/905 fuzes are usually 4 or 6 seconds for the arm delay, instant(0) for the function. Typically, the only bombs that will use function delays are your penetrating bombs (GBU-24A/B, GBU-31v3, and any other BLU-109 bomb body). They are usually equipped with a FMU-152 or more commonly the FMU-143. GBU-38s will typically be set to 14 seconds for the arm delay and instant(0) for the function and will either use the FMU-139 or 152, just depends on availability. GBU-12s and 10s typically get 139 fuzes are settings for the fuze vary depending on the mission task.

Hi, could you kindly create some Military liveries. Thanks, Timex 3

TPR ffb soft-ffbeast

You don't have to wait for it to happen, you can try it next time you fly. DMS AFT long and it will turn off, when you do it again it will turn back on. If that is not what you are doing when it turns off, then you need to check if some other keybind is set to DMS AFT.

I happen to have a mission today that requires EMCON Can't believe that after so many years, such a small feature has not been implemented

Там в начале ролика автор говорит что будет рассказывать про настройку нового тумана и про мультивыбор юнитов. Туман настроить не сложно, задав высоту эффекта и дальность видимости. А мультивыбор это выделение рамочкой.

My FFBeast has been completed and will be shipped on Monday. Thanks for the videos.

I have no MODS whatsoever, as you said I cleaned the FXO files and preformed file repair twice. I also switched off Vsync both in NVIDIA DCS profile and inside DCS itself. This had limited success, I Hope ED fixes this so we dont have to go around changing windows settings specifically run this software. Rmeinds of my old booot disks I had for running diffferent games in DOS 6.22 back in the day.

This is one of those non-consensual topics because.... "it depends". It really comes down to personal preference, setup, and the type of sim(s) you're playing. For flight sims, if you have the space, a large 16:9 screen (42"–55") can be really awesome - either a proper monitor or a good 4K TV with gaming features. I specifically recommend 16:9 because vertical screen space is crucial in flight sims, especially during dogfights where full 3D situational awareness matters. Widescreen formats like 21:9 or 32:9 (which are great for racing sims) reduce vertical FOV and hurt immersion in flight sims. I personally really disliked using a 49" ultrawide for DCS (like looking through a slit, with image distorted at sides), never again. VR, on the other hand, offers a massive leap in immersion - you're in the cockpit. But it’s not for everyone. It can be disorienting at first, especially with nausea or the disconnect from your physical space. Takes time to adapt but, once accustomated, it's unbeatable in the immersion aspect. It's hard to go back to “pancake” (monitor) gaming in DCS after adjusting to VR. The catch? VR demands serious hardware and a willingness to tweak settings. Which means you need to be ready to take the time to read/learn stuff and set it right, and to sacrifice a good deal of eye-candy, to keep framerate as high as possible and frametimes as low as possible. You’ll often sacrifice visual quality to maintain smooth performance - especially in DCS heavy modules or multiplayer. No current hardware completely solves this. I think if you got to question, then it means you'll always be tempted to at least try VR, and see how it is. Even if happy with a big screen (as was the case for me). So..... rather "just do it" and see for yourself. Just don't go wasting a big budget on a top fancy VR headset, disregard the latest (and even more demanding) trendy models that you'll see praised now. Instead, just get a good and proven affordable one, even if it's 2nd hand (for example, the Quest 3 or the Pico 4, also the HP Reverb G2 if you still use Win10). If it doesn't work for you, then resell it later.

Pour la rangée de 5 commutateurs, j'utilise un commutateur à verrouillage avec cette configuration. Pour un mouvement fluide, le haut du bouton n'est pas fixe. For the solenoid I was inspired by: https://giovannimedici.wordpress.com/2021/06/13/low-cost-magnetic-held-switch/ I redid the design to fit my assembly

Skins are on user files and links are in the first post. Fly safe!

Testing out the new F-16 flight modeling during a rainy day.

Have a great new year all!

Will Fulda be the 'big reveal' though? It's already been teased in several videos and stills. Might it be something from a 3rd party? It isn't always an ED module (Phantom was teased in a 'beyond' video).

New infantry with more diverse units (ATGM, machine gun...) and improved ground AI